
YouTube Destroys Free Speech by Banning Critique of Transgender Surgery
Ruth Institute President Dr Jennifer Roback Morse, PhD condemned YouTube’s decision to ban a Daily Signal/Heritage Foundation video with Dr Michelle Cretella, MD over her comment on transgenderism.
“The Sexual Revolutionaries running YouTube are cowards. They cannot refute Dr Cretella and the Heritage Foundation. They ban their opponents instead of confronting them. Big Tech is making Big Brother seem benign,” Morse said.
YouTube claims an observation by the eminent pediatrician, and executive director of the American College of Pediatricians, violates its hate speech code. In the 2017 interview, Cretella said: “If you want to cut off a leg or an arm, you’re mentally ill, but if you want to cut off healthy breasts or a penis, you’re transgender.”
“Dr Cretella’s remarks did not promote violence toward or hatred of anyone,” Morse declared. “Instead, it’s the type of mutilation which Cretella spoke out against that’s an act of violence.”
Morse continued: “YouTube has decided that a perfectly reasonable remark by a medical professional is hate speech. It uses this to justify banning inconvenient expression.”
Dr Cretella also appeared in the October 4 edition of The Dr J Show, the Ruth Institute’s new video podcast. Drs Morse and Cretella discussed a variety of concerns, including the medical consequences of so-called gender-transitioning. The Ruth Institute is urging its supporters to promote this interview as a way to counter the censorship against our friends at the Heritage Foundation.
In another case the Ruth Institute has been involved with, divorced parents were in a bitter custody dispute. The wife wanted to transition her 7-year-old son to a transgendered “female.” The husband fought it. After a public outcry, the judge granted joint custody. But she also issued a gag order preventing the parties from discussing the case publicly. Said Morse, “This is another outrageous example of censorship involving transgenderism.”
Despite YouTube’s attempts to silence dissent, the Heritage Foundation has made the public aware of the injustice through its direct email communications with supporters. The Ruth Institute urges the public to subscribe to its lists, so we can inform them if we’ve been de-platformed on social media.
“We intend to keep fighting to get the truth out, regardless of what Big Tech thinks or does,” Dr Morse said.
___
The Ruth Institute is a global interfaith non-profit organization equipping Christians to defend the family and build a civilization of love.
Dr Morse is the author of The Sexual State: How Elite Ideologies Are Destroying Lives.
Find out more about The Ruth Institute here.
Recent Articles:
20 October 2026
7.7 MINS
France and Europe are burning — is it too late to save them from the barbarians?
20 October 2026
4.6 MINS
As rioters burn cars and historical buildings, celebrating the destruction of France’s inheritance, the West confronts an uncomfortable question: what happens when a civilisation loses the will to defend itself?
20 October 2026
4.9 MINS
A federal investigation has exposed how America’s biggest banks shut out conservative and Christian clients, relying on subjective reputation risks and controversial ideological watchdogs.
19 October 2026
6.7 MINS
Europe’s escalating unrest raises urgent questions about immigration, national identity, secularism and the decline of Christian influence, prompting calls for repentance, prayer and renewed leadership.
19 October 2026
2.7 MINS
The UK Greens’ vote to define Zionism as racism has exposed deep divisions within the party, raising questions about its future leadership and political direction.
16 October 2026
4 MINS
Katie Zacharia’s first days as White House Press Secretary have sparked fierce media criticism, but her remarkable testimony of surviving an abortion attempt tells a deeper story.
16 October 2026
3.4 MINS
Australia’s proposed digital duty of care laws promise greater online safety and increased user control by switching off algorithms, but critics warn they could give ministers sweeping powers to restrict lawful content and threaten free speech.





