
Removing Margaret Sanger’s Name Won’t Mean Fewer Black Babies Killed
Ruth Institute President Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., called Planned Parenthood’s announcement that Margaret Sanger’s name will be taken off its Manhattan clinic
“an important gesture, but still just a token. In New York City, there will still be almost as many abortions of black children each year as live births.”
With the renewed emphasis on removing vestiges of past racism, it’s hard to ignore Sanger’s history. “The mother of the U.S. population control movement – who’s often described as an abortion pioneer – was a dedicated eugenicist,” Morse explained.
“As such, she believed in keeping down populations she considered ‘racially inferior.’ That meant non-whites.”
Sanger made no attempt to hide her beliefs. Even Adolf Hitler was aware of her views. She was one of only two Americans he praised, along with anti-Semitic conspiratorialist Henry Ford.
“If she was alive, Margaret Sanger would be thrilled by the effect of abortion in the United States,” Morse noted.
“African American women account for roughly 13% of the total population, but 38% of all abortions performed in this country. It’s been conservatively estimated that since Roe v. Wade, more than 20 million abortions have been performed on African Americans — more than the entire black population of the United States in 1960.”
Sanger’s views aren’t confined to a benighted past. In 2009, Associate Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the Court’s most liberal members, said that one reason for Roe was
“concern about population growth and particularly growth of populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
“Who was she talking about, I wonder?” Morse asked sardonically, “Blue-eyed, blondes?”
“Taking Sanger’s name off its Manhattan clinic changes nothing. Planned Parenthood will still locate its clinics in poor minority neighborhoods. People of color will still suffer disproportionately from abortion. Besides, helping poor people means expanding their opportunities, not killing their children.”
The Ruth Institute’s 2020 Summit for Survivors of the Sexual Revolution (July 17-18) included a discussion of proven social science research about post-abortion trauma by Fr. Paul Sullins, Ph.D., the Ruth Institute’s Senior Research Associate.
[Photo by Seven Shooter on Unsplash]Recent Articles:
8 October 2026
3.6 MINS
John Anderson warns that Australia’s decline is rooted in spiritual and cultural disintegration, calling for a recovery of Christian foundations, social cohesion and national purpose.
8 October 2026
4.1 MINS
Italy honours St Francis of Assisi 800 years after his death, celebrating a saint whose devotion to Christ, radical simplicity and message of peace continue to shape generations.
7 October 2026
3.6 MINS
Victoria’s 18th March for the Babies will bring families together to peacefully affirm the value of every human life and call for a cultural change towards life.
7 October 2026
1.5 MINS
Across the Middle East, North Africa and Anatolia, Christianity once shaped entire civilisations. Could Britain’s Christian heritage likewise become a memory rather than a reality?
7 October 2026
6 MINS
What can Tucker Carlson’s interview with Jacob Rees-Mogg teach us about political disagreement? Their clash over war, Russia and national defence highlights the importance of listening carefully and understanding an opponent’s position before attempting to refute it.
7 October 2026
8.5 MINS
Gerald McDermott’s work challenges Christians to approach Israel through Scripture first, exploring God’s covenant faithfulness, Christian Zionism, Jewish identity and antisemitism.
7 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Medicine was created to heal and preserve life. Yet abortion, euthanasia and gender medicine increasingly redefine death and destruction as care, leaving the vulnerable dangerously exposed.





