
Removing Margaret Sanger’s Name Won’t Mean Fewer Black Babies Killed
Ruth Institute President Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D., called Planned Parenthood’s announcement that Margaret Sanger’s name will be taken off its Manhattan clinic
“an important gesture, but still just a token. In New York City, there will still be almost as many abortions of black children each year as live births.”
With the renewed emphasis on removing vestiges of past racism, it’s hard to ignore Sanger’s history. “The mother of the U.S. population control movement – who’s often described as an abortion pioneer – was a dedicated eugenicist,” Morse explained.
“As such, she believed in keeping down populations she considered ‘racially inferior.’ That meant non-whites.”
Sanger made no attempt to hide her beliefs. Even Adolf Hitler was aware of her views. She was one of only two Americans he praised, along with anti-Semitic conspiratorialist Henry Ford.
“If she was alive, Margaret Sanger would be thrilled by the effect of abortion in the United States,” Morse noted.
“African American women account for roughly 13% of the total population, but 38% of all abortions performed in this country. It’s been conservatively estimated that since Roe v. Wade, more than 20 million abortions have been performed on African Americans — more than the entire black population of the United States in 1960.”
Sanger’s views aren’t confined to a benighted past. In 2009, Associate Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, one of the Court’s most liberal members, said that one reason for Roe was
“concern about population growth and particularly growth of populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
“Who was she talking about, I wonder?” Morse asked sardonically, “Blue-eyed, blondes?”
“Taking Sanger’s name off its Manhattan clinic changes nothing. Planned Parenthood will still locate its clinics in poor minority neighborhoods. People of color will still suffer disproportionately from abortion. Besides, helping poor people means expanding their opportunities, not killing their children.”
The Ruth Institute’s 2020 Summit for Survivors of the Sexual Revolution (July 17-18) included a discussion of proven social science research about post-abortion trauma by Fr. Paul Sullins, Ph.D., the Ruth Institute’s Senior Research Associate.
[Photo by Seven Shooter on Unsplash]Recent Articles:
29 October 2026
2.7 MINS
If passed, the Digital Duty of Care Bill 2026 will almost certainly lead to censorship of Bible-based convictions about marriage, abortion, gender, Islam and more. Here's why it should be rejected and how to make a submission by 30 October.
29 October 2026
3.4 MINS
Professor of Law Dr Joanna Howe is taking her employer to the Federal Court after an alleged 11-month in-house investigation into her public pro-life advocacy.
29 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Personal liberty cannot flourish without good manners and respect for others. Drawing on J.S. Mill and historic reformers, this piece explores freedom, peaceful protest and the common good.
29 October 2026
3.6 MINS
Dr Michael Youssef warns that radical progressivism and political Islam have formed a dangerous alliance against Western Judeo-Christian values, urging Christians to stand firm in truth.
29 October 2026
3.2 MINS
Liechtenstein’s Hereditary Prince Alois has blocked abortion law reform, defending unborn babies while championing practical support for pregnant women and families facing difficult circumstances.
28 October 2026
4 MINS
The assault on Helen Haines highlights Australia’s growing political hostility. Recovering civility requires personal accountability, respectful debate and a renewed commitment to Christian moral foundations.
28 October 2026
4.4 MINS
Christian commentator Samuel Sey’s ICE arrest has sparked fierce controversy, exposing deep divisions among conservatives as supporters call for prayer, compassion and a swift legal resolution.





