
Moral Injury — An Event that Violates Deeply Held Moral Beliefs or Values
Moral injury is an event that violates deeply-held moral beliefs or values. It can cause a profound psychological distress that results from actions, or lack of them, which deeply impacts one’s moral code. (Williamson, Murphy and Greenberg, 2020)
It may be something I have done, deeply personal and not necessarily known to any person other than myself. It may be something I have done that involves others, even without them ever knowing. It may be something that has been done to me or I have witnessed done to others. It may be something that I have been compelled or obliged to do by others with the power to enforce it, or because they did not support me as they ought.
It may at times simply be the “failure” or not having the capacity and time to give assistance or care when such was necessary. It is more than “just” a traumatic event. It is also something more than “just” guilt, although this may also have to be dealt with. Even when the event involves no actual physical describable trauma, it is still a violation and it needs to be recognised as such as part of recovery.
Recognising/acknowledging the reality/truth of what happened, that it was more than just a traumatic or tragic event, that it ran in opposition to deeply held morals, that it was the result of a deliberate, non-accidental, course of action that was in conflict with those morals — even if it seemed there was no other course of action when it might have been the lesser of two evils — is required for recovery to occur.
One has to recognise the difference between this distress and other traumatic events; and recognise the “normality” of the particular distress. “Oh! So that’s why I feel so bad.” “Oh, that’s such a relief.”
And that might be all that is needed for spontaneous — even if guided — recovery to occur. For others, recovery may be protracted and intense, and the following may be helpful:
- What happened? Tell me the story. How did it come about? This is what I remember.
- Why? Further detail regarding circumstances. Was it preventable? Might it have happened differently?
- If only’s
- Anger (at significant others, those in authority, doctor, hospital, self, God)
- Resentments & Appreciations (were there any?)
- Unfinished business
- Guilt
- Mourning/crying/grieving/agony/lament.
- Goodbye. May take many years. Including to ongoing relationships and privileges.
- Letting go e.g. as per the Serenity Prayer
- Hello to the future (to relationships at a different level; to new relationships; to wholeness and freedom)
- Forgiveness of others and self (if necessary and as appropriate; is incomplete until we have acknowledged wrong and felt appropriate agony and anger and anguish and grief)
The above may be expressed as a diary entry to self or God, or a letter to God, or to parents, spouse, deceased, significant others — or just a written record.
Feelings are to be felt rather than analysed, and not judged according to rightness or wrongness. Mixtures of feelings all at the one time are OK.
“Staging” is artificial. We can move back and forth through the whole spectrum and this is also OK.
The use of the empty chair technique may be helpful in some of these categories.
___
See Luke’s Journal, Vol. 26 No. 1, February 2021, Moral Injury Conference.
Originally published at Choose Life Australia.
Photo by Tamara Bellis on Unsplash.
Recent Articles:
14 October 2026
6.7 MINS
A national poll challenges claims that pro-life Australians are extremists, revealing broad support for abortion restrictions, protections for unborn babies and safeguards for vulnerable women.
14 October 2026
5.5 MINS
As Christianity fades from public life, Marxism or Communism offers a substitute faith built on oppression, liberation and political salvation — but at what cost?
14 October 2026
5.3 MINS
Marco Rubio’s Athens speech celebrates the Greek, Roman and Christian foundations of Western civilisation, warning that cultural self-loathing and radical ideologies threaten its future.
13 October 2026
3.9 MINS
Tasmania’s proposed conversion practices law raises serious concerns for churches, parents and faith-based schools, with broad definitions, severe penalties and uncertain protections for religious freedom.
12 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Learn how journalists use loaded language, selective quotes and misleading headlines to shape public opinion, using a controversial report about James and Joanna Howe as a case study.
12 October 2026
3.1 MINS
The proposed livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution has reignited debate over justice, deterrence and public accountability, with critics comparing American justice to ISIS propaganda.
12 October 2026
3.7 MINS
An EU court case over baptismal records could pit data protection laws against religious freedom, raising serious questions about whether governments can compel churches to erase sacramental history.





