The Daily Declaration
Roe v Wade

Abortion Bans, Gay Marriage, and the Aussie Pro-Life Movement: Fallout from Roe v Wade Reversal

27 June 2022

3.1 MINS

The fallout from the Roe v Wade revocation in the United States continues. The pro-abortion lobby has been devastated by the change, while pro-lifers celebrate perhaps their biggest victory ever. What implications can we expect from the recent landmark decision? More importantly, what can we learn?

1. Abortion Bans in the United States – Where are they likely?

The recent ruling (Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization) by the Supreme Court does not ban abortion. In fact, it doesn’t directly change abortion legislation in the US. What it does do, however, is reverse the decision made (in Roe v Wade) that abortion is a right protected under the Constitution.

In this sense, the decision is far less radical than the current pro-abortion hysteria would suggest. All it does is give the states the power to allow, limit, or ban abortion. It’s their choice.

In contrast, what Roe v Wade did was force states to legalise abortion to one degree or another. Sounds very pro-choice, doesn’t it?

The important question is: will there be any major change in the United States?

According to Fox News, thirteen states will immediately ban abortion, while thirteen others could follow suit shortly.

Several states have ‘trigger laws’ that will automatically ban abortion following the ruling. According to the Guttmacher Institute, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming will immediately ban the practice.

Another five states (Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, West Virginia and Wisconsin) have old abortion bans from before Roe v Wade that will go into effect now that the ruling has been overturned. Ironically, some of these states have Democratic governors.

Other states also seem likely to ban abortion at some point in the near future.

In total, twenty-five or twenty-six states seem likely to ban abortion in short order.

As Shane Pruitt, the National Next Gen Director of the Southern Baptist Convention’s North American Mission Board, said, there is still work to be done.

‘A massive step in helping babies have the opportunity that so many haven’t: LIVING!

Still have ways to go. Both laws & hearts need to be changed.’


2. Homosexual Marriage: The next challenge?

The ruling may even have the unforeseen (and curious) flow-on result of bringing down same-sex marriage in the US. Unlike in Australia (where a voluntary postal survey was held), homosexual marriage was forced on US state governments in 2015 by the nine (unelected) justices of the Supreme Court.

There was certainly no pretending that the decision was democratic.

In the recent ruling, Justice Clarence Thomas called on his colleagues to re-examine old cases where similar Supreme Court mistakes may have been made.

Apparently, the decision made yesterday highlights an issue with the ‘substantive due process’ in the Supreme Court. According to Justice Thomas, this same faulty reasoning was involved in rulings made concerning contraception and LGBTQ issues (including same-sex marriage).

Hence, the decision has potentially broad legal implications.

“We have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.” (Justice Clarence Thomas)

But will it happen? It’s hard to know. It seems like a long bow…

Certainly, pro-family campaigners should not hold their collective breath. Still, Friday’s ruling does have implications that could one day lead to the 2015 same-sex marriage ruling being revoked. We’ll see what happens.

3. The Australian Pro-Life Movement: What can we learn?

Finally, the recent decision has momentous implications for the Australian pro-life movement. Australians have much to learn from their American counterparts. Here are two thoughts:

Firstly, the US outcome should be an encouragement. For years, pro-life activists in Australia have encountered setbacks and legislative defeats. Abortion is now legal in all states around the country.

But the American situation tells us that change is possible in the long run. We should be encouraged. If America can do it, perhaps we can too!

Secondly, we need persistence and diligence if we are to roll back the dreadful death laws around our nation. And here, again, the American situation is advisory.

It was only through the grace of God – through faithful prayer and diligent effort – that Roe v Wade was revoked. It came on the back of a huge cultural shift. Australians need to mobilise prayer for our nation to wake up to the horror of its death culture.

Similarly, we need to get behind fantastic pro-life lobby groups and organisations like Cherish Life QLD, LifeChoice Australia, the Australian Christian Lobby and Emily’s Voice.

So much needs to change in Australia before we can see the kind of progress on this front that we see in America. A widespread, passionate movement is emerging; cultural reform is underway. But we have a long way to go yet.

Encouragingly, pro-life cultural change is something we are seeing now around the world, particularly in my generation.

Be encouraged, but keep up the fight for life!


Photo: Maria Oswalt

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.


  1. Kay Christensen 27 June 2022 at 6:38 pm - Reply

    Just setting Cody Mitchell straight on two points; he has mistaken the name of the SCOTUS Judge whom he quoted throughout the previous article: the Judge in question is not Thomas Clarence but Clarence Thomas & secondly Emily ‘s List is a group of pro-abortion activists not, as he obviously assumed, pro-lifers.

    • Cody Mitchell 27 June 2022 at 7:25 pm - Reply

      Hey Kay, thanks so much for your feedback. I’ve corrected the name of the SCOTUS judge as per your correction. Thank you so much for pointing that out. On the second point, Emily’s Voice (not to be confused with Emily’s List) is a pregnancy crisis centre. for more.

  2. Kaylene Emery 27 June 2022 at 7:58 pm - Reply

    Can anyone recall who it was who said “ it’s not the despairI can’t stand….I can stand the despair. It’s the hope I can’t stand “ ? The depth of this comment comes to mind now.
    Thank you for your work On behalf of our babies girls n women Cody .

  3. Kaylene emery 27 June 2022 at 11:07 pm - Reply

    Just need to say that I also appreciate what you do for men n boys through this article Cody.
    You dare to speak you dare to write you dare to take action.
    May Our Lord Jesus Christ continue to bless you n yours.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life



The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.






Go to Top