Australian Study Reveals High Rates of Long-Term Myocarditis Symptoms After Covid-19 Injection
Almost 55% of the study’s participants were still suffering myocarditis symptoms six months after onset of the disease.
More than half of Victorians diagnosed with myocarditis as a result of a Covid-19 injection reported ongoing symptoms 6 months after contracting the disease, according to a new peer-reviewed study published in the journal Vaccine.
Researchers found that females were significantly more likely than males to report ongoing symptoms at all stages of the study, with only 22.6% of women experiencing symptom resolution at 6 months compared to 51.9% of men.
Overall, 54.8% of the study’s participants were still suffering myocarditis symptoms half a year after discovering their jab-induced sickness.
“Females were also more likely to continue medication and have ongoing exercise restrictions,” researchers noted.
“However, males were significantly more likely to have higher initial peak troponin results and abnormal initial cardiac imaging investigations.”
In conclusion, the study warned that “there appears to be a significant proportion of patients who experience ongoing symptoms to 6 months post onset” of the disease.
The study follows an earlier finding by Swiss researchers that the Moderna mRNA ‘booster’ injection caused silent heart damage for 1 in 35 people who received it.
The TGA’s Claims Put to Lie
The latest revelation contradicts the years-long claim by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) that myocarditis caused by the jab “is often mild, and cases usually resolve after a few days with treatment and rest”.
As reported by The Daily Declaration, the TGA had already identified well over 500 cases of injection-linked myocarditis by November 2021.
It took until April 2023 for the TGA to finally acknowledge that “adolescents and younger adults have a lower age-related risk of severe COVID-19, and a comparatively higher risk of myocarditis following vaccination”.
By that late stage in the national roll-out, however, the vast majority of young Australians had already been injected with the product, in many cases under duress by their own governments.
And while the TGA has also long insisted that myocarditis is a known complication of Covid-19 itself, allegedly putting the unvaccinated at greater risk of the condition, there are findings that contradict such a claim.
One large, peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine involving almost 200,000 unvaccinated adults in Israel, for instance, found no increased incidence of myocarditis in those recovering from Covid-19 infection.
Accountability for Government Wrongdoing
The latest finding underscores the need for a Royal Commission into Australia’s response to Covid-19.
During the Covid era, Australian governments explicitly rejected the principle of informed consent and chose instead to force-inject their populations.
While the Australian Immunisation Handbook states that vaccines “must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”, authorities imposed heavy-handed injection mandates on Australians.
Citizens were deprived of their freedom to work, travel, use public and private amenities, and be with loved ones at important moments such as births, deaths and funerals, unless they submitted to a novel medical treatment.
In enacting medical mandates, governments assumed total power over the bodies of millions of Australians, violated Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, arguably breached the Nuremberg code, and parted with a century of sound medical ethics.
That not enough was known about the Covid-19 injections at the time is no defence for these actions. A lack of long-term data is precisely why mandates were ethically indefensible from the beginning.
Adding insult to injury, the Australian government silenced doctors via gag order, and censored citizens who questioned the Covid-19 products by colluding with social media companies to have their posts taken down. These actions were not taken in ignorance but in a conscious effort to reinforce a pre-decided narrative and stamp out dissent.
Where there is risk there must be choice.
And where there is wrongdoing, there must be accountability.
Image via Unsplash.
26 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
13 December 2024
2.5 MINS
Australia’s government is yet to respond to calls to protect children from chemical castration drugs that are now banned in five European nations and half the United States.
13 December 2024
5.3 MINS
Yesterday, a Melbourne Federal Court judge ruled in favour of expelled Liberal Party member Moira Deeming. Victorian Liberal leader John Pesutto was found guilty of having defamed Deeming, having smeared her as a neo-Nazi.
13 December 2024
2.1 MINS
Despite relentless propaganda, excessive police brutality, and growing economic hardships, the French people continued to resist in the streets. One after another, there were sustained nationwide protests, ultimately thwarting Macron’s attempt at total control.
13 December 2024
5.8 MINS
The new Moderna factory opened in Victoria this week with the promise of pumping out up to 100 million doses of mRNA vaccines per year, amid rising vaccine hesitancy and unresolved safety concerns.
-
13 December 2024
5 MINS
NIH Director appointee Dr Jay Bhattacharya has been accused of advocating a “let it rip” approach to public health. It's time to re-evaluate this claim.
12 December 2024
3.2 MINS
Speaking with 2GB, Dutton said that if the LNP wins next year’s election, the only flag he’ll stand in front of is Australia’s National Flag, the blue ensign.
-
12 December 2024
5.5 MINS
The former president famously declared he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours. Can he do it? And what will his strategy be?
And yet. I am sure there will be no accounting. We were let down by government and our Churches.
I’m with you and I’m an Anglican Priest
Thank you Kurt and no one knows what the long term effects of the injections will be. Myocarditis can and does have long term consequences on heart health.
Please pray for justice for the vaccine injured via Dr Mel McCann’s Class Action which is currently before the courts.
What happened is evil. We were forced to suffer damage to our bodies. There is no justice in Australia’s courts. How many politicians and and their families avoided the vaccines ? Who were they ?
That is a question we will never know the answer to.
In my comment above, I was referring to very long term consequences as in years.
But these are not long term consequences at all. They are adverse effects which have appeared very soon after vaccination. The issue here with this (actually small) group of people is that the symptoms have continued for longer than usual with these cases.
The reality is that there have never been, and never will be, adverse effects many months or years after any vaccination. They simply don’t work that way.
This may be true if these were actually vaccines – but they are not. They do not carry information that your body uses to identify and destroy a virus – they carry instructions on how to make a component of a virus itself and it spreads all accross your entire body, causing your immune system to destroy cells in organs the disease never targeted. Additionally the virus targets all manor organs, unique to its suspicious genesis and may carry its own longer term effects.
Perhaps we won’t see long term effects, and I hope not. But mRNA mass distributed was a giant experiment and we know far less than we ought to only a few years on.
This is utter nonsense, and you display a complete ignorance of how these vaccines (yes, vaccines) work. But I’ll let real doctors, not the anti-vax grifters you obviously follow, explain it for you:
“Messenger RNAs, mRNAS, are the messages that the cell uses to create a variety of proteins, which are building blocks and tools for cell function and survival. mRNA vaccines send that message with a blueprint, and it’s a message that has an auto destruct feature, like Mission Impossible or a Snapchat message. The mRNA vaccine takes the blueprint of the viral spike protein, and enables the immune system to generate very protective high level neutralizing antibodies. The body recognizes that spike protein and remembers that it has seen it before, so that next time when there is an infection, it attacks the full virus.”
(https://medicine.yale.edu/media-player/understanding-covid-19-how-mrna-vaccines-work/)
“mRNA is like a little recipe for how to make that spike protein. When we get these vaccines, our body makes that spike protein and we develop an immune defense to it without ever having to be exposed to the whole virus. It’s not exposing us to the whole virus at all, live or killed. It’s only allowing us to make a little bit of that spike protein, which is just a tiny portion of the virus, and then we react to that and become protected from the whole virus.
mRNA in these vaccines can only get into the main part of the cell, but it can’t get into the nucleus of the cell, which is where our own DNA lives. It can’t incorporate into our DNA. It also doesn’t live very long, and it doesn’t last very long. It’s very fragile, and that’s why it has to be stored at these ultra cold temperatures. It’s not stable for very long. So, it goes into the body, it goes into the cell for a matter of hours, and starts to make this protein. Then in the coming days, our bodies react to that protein but that messenger RNA doesn’t hang around nor does it get into our DNA.”
(https://www.mayoclinic.org/mrna-vaccines-immunity/vid-20507649)
Brilliant and needed article exposing the lie of safe and effective!
But how is the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines a “lie” if this study is consistent with the data from around the world, proving that the condition is extremely rare? And especially as Kurt failed to note the fact that the study also confirmed that, although these symptoms were long lasting for a few, none of them were more than mild?
And as one of the studies this particular study was reliant on revealed that the risk of Myocarditis in these vaccines is identical to vaccines which have been in use for over six decades, yet without their safety and effectiveness ever questioned, that begs the question: why now?
May I suggest, Warwick, that this is a manifestation of the term “safetyism”, coined by Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff in their book, “The Coddling of the American Mind”. In an article in the Saturday Evening Post (https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2019/08/the-safety-police/) they tell us:
“Safety is good, of course, and keeping others safe from harm is virtuous, but virtues can become vices when carried to extremes. “Safetyism” refers to a culture or belief system in which safety has become a sacred value, which means that people become unwilling to make trade-offs demanded by other practical and moral concerns. “Safety” trumps everything else, no matter how unlikely or trivial the potential danger. ”
And the reality is, there are numerous safety products, for example, seat belts, which are responsible for a similarly extremely rare occurrence of serious injury and death each year. But we never call for those to be banned, or for Royal Commissions to apportion guilt to those who manufacture them or regulators who make their use compulsory.
From my own observation this “safetyism” also induces confirmation bias, whereby the issues one sees as problematic are magnified over alternatives to maintain one’s fixed opinion.
How else can it be explained when the same people who criticise the safety of these vaccines scoff at the fact that the death rate from C-19 is 1%, but then be outraged at a normally mild and self correcting adverse effect of the vaccine which has a risk factor of 0.007% for the most at risk age group?
And even more, when that same adverse effect, as a symptom of the virus, according to the study in this article, is 3-8 times more prevalent in that most at risk cohort, and far more severe, leading to potential long term or permanent heart damage, and ultimate premature death?
And while Haidt and Lukianoff, in their article, write in particular about administrators on university campuses, the application is also relevant to the governance of the pandemic by our politicians and health officials:
“Overreaction and overregulation are usually the work of people within bureaucratic structures who have developed a mindset commonly known as CYA (Cover Your Ass). They know they can be held responsible for any problem that arises on their watch, especially if they took no action to prevent it, so they often adopt a defensive stance. In their minds, overreacting is better than underreacting, overregulating is better than underregulating, and caution is better than courage. This attitude reinforces the safetyism mindset…”
Think of this. When rampant safetyism causes administrators to adopt a defensive stance and overregulate in one direction, what is going to occur when, in the case of our various governments overreacting during the pandemic, they are hit with safetyism from opposite directions (which this article typifies)?
The bottom line: we, as Christians, are called to lead and be a positive influence on culture (the whole foundational purpose of revival that I’ve been writing about). But how can we be that if we, like other groups, are hostages to the “spirit of the age” through “safetyism”? We become hostage to those hindrances to revival that I wrote about. we end up as the tail instead of the head.
All heart inflammation is a severe condition and an unacceptable side effect to be caught hiding.
Kurt’s rhetoric was against the argument that “mild” and “myocarditus” can possibly go together and that a “swift recovery” could even remotely suggest safety.
There is a myriad of evidence that undiagnosed myo and peri carditus was a not-uncommon side effect of mRNA inocculation — and the damage caused is both unknowable and immense.
First, heart inflammation has not been hidden by anyone anywhere. It’s been known about from the start. And it has also been known from the start that it is extremely rare, and mild to the point that all but a few cases resolve with little or no medical intervention within days. That’s an across the board risk of 1 in 100,000, with young males being the highest risk at 1 in 20,000.
So how you can argue that’s not safe enough really makes no sense. And for two reasons that I already made clear.
First, it is almost identical in that regard to other vaccines which have been in constant use for several decades. Why now are people saying such a risk is unacceptable? Especially when there are so many other things in life with such extremely low risk like death or permanent injury like seat belts?
Second, when the incidence of heart inflammation as a symptom of the virus is many times higher, and the symptoms much more serious, where is your sense of perspective? If the worst outcome for a very small number of people is to be still experiencing these symptoms months later, which are being managed, yet a far greater number of people who caught the virus now have long term or permanent heart damage that cannot be treated or repaired, those are people who will quite possibly die prematurely.
Why do you not care about those people?
It’s one thing to report on a limited study of 377 individuals, the sum total of those diagnosed with Covid-19 vaccine associated myocarditis in Victoria. It’s another thing altogether to put it under a “fake news” style headline, “Australian Study Reveals High Rates of Long-Term Myocarditis Symptoms After Covid-19 Injection”, as though a large number of people are involved.
But the paper cited reveals how extremely rare the incidence is:
“This risk is highest in young males aged 12–40 years, particularly after the second dose of an mRNA platform COVID-19 vaccinations, [with peak incidence in 16–17 year old males (75.9 cases per million doses after receiving second dose of mRNA vaccine).”
Get that? Peak incidence 75.9 per million. And as we know from so many studies done around the world in the past three years, the average across both sexes and all age groups is 10 per million.
And Kurt should know that you really need to check the cross referenced articles too. If he had, he would have found this one in the footnotes: “Recovery from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine-related myocarditis (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352464222002723), which gives us this:
“In the USA, incidence of mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis within 21 days of the second dose peaks in males aged 12–29 years (8·4 to 26·7 cases per 100 000 males). Myocarditis risk is higher after SARS-CoV-2 virus infection than after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.4 In fact, myocarditis was diagnosed in 59·0 to 63·7 per 100 000 males aged 12–29 years within 21 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular or antigen test…Overall risk of myocarditis and hospitalisation are lower in this age group after vaccination compared with overall risk after SARS-CoV-2 infection without vaccination.”
It remains a mystery to me how someone can dig through a mountain of data that proves that the risk from these vaccines is extremely low. In fact the same link mentions the fact that the phenomenon has been an equally rare risk in vaccines like smallpox and anthrax which have been in use for several decades.
It remains an even deeper mystery why they would still be doing so after so much time and so many articles which have all been thoroughly refuted. After all, when someone writes an article repudiating conspiracy theories (https://dailydeclaration.org.au/2021/03/01/so-are-we-all-conspiracy-theorists-now/) in this fashion:
“A conspiracy theory rejects the commonly accepted story about an unusual event in favour of a more sinister explanation. Conspiracy theories tend to invoke shady figures hidden from public view — powerful (often political) groups that carry out a secret plot to harm others to their own benefit…
… A telltale marker of a conspiracy theory is that it can’t be falsified. In other words, evidence for it and a lack of evidence for it are both taken as proof that the theory is true. In this way, conspiracy theories are essentially a matter of faith, rather than something that can be objectively proven or disproven.”
Yet that same person is spreading distorted and cherry-picked data, and using that to cast negative aspersions on those ion authority three years later, I don’t think it’s unfair to ask for an explanation.
And as Christians, when there is so much data that proves how much more frequent and damaging the adverse effects from the vaccine are as symptoms of the disease, not to mention the far greater impact than the few people in the Victorian study of “Long Covid”, which involves serious to permanent organ damage, not only to the heart, but to almost every other bodily organ, and for a significant number a premature death.
If as Christians we are going to be devoted to both truth and compassion for others, this long drawn out, and ultimately futile, campaign against the vaccines is a dereliction of both.
Kurt, I loved your mater of fact report and your balanced conclusions. Sadly, the image that comes to mind, from both the British and Australian parliaments, namely ’empty chambers’ when the vaccine injuries and the excess deaths were being raised.
What does that say? Simply that the vast majority of our parliamentarians, and those purportedly representing the British, are treating the few courageous members who dared to raise their concerns, with contempt and the victims of the vaccines as collateral damage, for the ‘greater good’.
I believe that so called democracies likes these are a mockery of democracy. I believe that one day, the majority of our populations will realize they are not being represented at all. Something will arise that really hurts the majority, then they will wake up, but not till then.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=1i1RlGqKRlY&si=kUtP2kG2GiJwawct
Thank you Kurt for this article..keep up the great reporting
It’s not only myocarditis the injections are responsible for but in reality, many of us see the results of the so called ‘safe and effective’ injections all around us. Thousands of nurses were sacked after actually witnessing the patients’ post-injection injuries after the roll out and intelligently chose not to be part of the experiment.
Due to the AHPRA gag order, any courageous doctors or nurses who spoke up were sacked or suspended.
https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-florida-surgeon-general?r=tyosz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
If only you had done some research instead of blindly posting a link that only appears to support your anti-vaxxer stance. Because if you had even bothered to study the link itself you would find that so many of those peer reviewed articles are nothing of the kind. All they are is single case studies.
What that means is that there are issues that are only suspected of being adverse effects of the vaccines which are reported in SINGLE case studies. Most of these conditions only have ONE case study in the literature. So there might be 1,000 peer reviewed studies, but they certainly don’t suggest what you’re suggesting by posting it.
A good example is the entry for Multiple Sclerosis, which containd a mere four single case studies.
Yet, as was reported in “Multiple Sclerosis News Today (https://multiplesclerosisnewstoday.com/…/lets-talk…/) just this year:
“A survey released in late 2021 reviewed side effects reported by more than 700 people with MS following their COVID-19 vaccinations. I was among them. Conducted by iConquerMS, a people-powered research organization, it reported the side effects for the respondents with MS were about the same as those reported by the general population. There was no indication that the vaccines were an MS trigger. At about the same time, an Italian study of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine found no evidence that it increased the risk of MS relapses in the two months following vaccination.”
But then there’s this, which is identical to every single adverse reaction to the vaccine. They are ALL FAR MORE DAMAGING and FAR MORE PREVALENT as symptoms of COVID-19!
“The other side of that coin was reported in a study this year by researchers at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. It concluded that the virus that causes COVID-19 — the virus, not the vaccine — might trigger an MS-like disease in some individuals (https://multiplesclerosisnewstoday.com/news-posts/2023/01/10/ms-could-be-triggered-covid-19-via-molecular-mimicry/) .
So, what that means, Cheryl, is that you are guilty of posting material that, due to it being so misleading, might persuade someone with such a condition who might otherwise seek protection by getting vaccinated to not do so, and consequently fall ill and potentially suffer life altering or shortening consequences. Because some of the most vulnerable people in relation to COVID-19 are people with such conditions.
Is that what you want??
As for your Hydroxychloroquine paper from Peter McCullough, the fact that the paper has been refuted, and in fact never passed peer review, and yet you’re still pushing it over three years on, speaks volumes about the anti-vaxxer’s inability to do any real research beyond finding whatever confirms their own biases and pushing it for all they can.
And that’s without considering the host of other dangerous and discredited claims he’s made over the past three years.
The reality is that there are almost as many peer reviewed studies as there are in your bogus “1,000 peer reviewed studies on vaccine injuries” article proving that it is useless, and in fact can cause harm!
Here’s just a few, but there’s heaps more:
https://www.medrxiv.org/con…/10.1101/2020.04.14.20065276v4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7384270/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22446-z
Dear Kym Beazley, (same name as an x-minister)
Thank you for your very detailed information. And yes, everyone can cherry pick data which can be used to make an argument for and against.
The fact is was our very own health minister at the time of Covid, Greg Hunt, stated on record the Covid-19 vaccine was the world’s largest experimental vaccine. It’s on parliamentary record.
As it is an experiment no one can state for certainty that the newly developed mRNA Sars-Cov2 injection is safe & effective. I believe the spiked protein is wrapped in an envelope of lipid nano particles, which had never been used before. I’m not a virologist so I will stand corrected.
The populations world-wide are the subjects of an experimental mRNA injection, which is an on-going trial. The data of the experimental injection to date have not been released.
The fact is there has been an increase in unexplained deaths worldwide. Deaths not due to covid but unexplained. It has been a world-wide phenomenon. Has any government investigated this? Not that I am aware of. In Australia the fact is an investigation into these unexplained deaths was dismissed by the current government. Why? If there is a link to the experimental injection the Australian population has a right to know the truth. If there is nothing to hide, why wouldn’t this be investigated, why isn’t it of great concern? Don’t they want us to be safe & well?
The Australian population has a right to have a Royal Commission to investigate every aspect of this experimental mRNA injection. The injection, the deaths, the injuries, the government response, the medical advice we were given etc. Then & only then will we will know the truth.
Just because someone chooses not to take part in the world’s largest experimental injection, it does not mean they are anti-vaxx, a term which is actually very offensive. (Perhaps it could be classed as hate speech.) It simply means that person is using discernment & waiting to see what the actual results of this world-wide experiment are before making an informed decision.
As Christians it is not right to encourage hatred or belittle people on the basis they choose differently. We are all Gods children & he does love us all. He made us perfect as we are. I question should we be making men in white coats “Gods” ? Should we be living in fear? I would suggest not.
My prayers are with so many people who are suffering at this time and have been totally gas-lighted by the medical profession. It is wrong on every level but the truth will prevail.
God bless, wellness to all.
Strange that you acknowledge the risk of cherry-picking data, only to do so yourself in the next breath:
“The fact is was our very own health minister at the time of Covid, Greg Hunt, stated on record the Covid-19 vaccine was the world’s largest experimental vaccine. It’s on parliamentary record.”
Actually, yours is more the result of confirmation bias typical of the anti-vax narrative, as it’s the endpoint of a “Chinese Whispers” situation. Greg Hunt did NOT state on parliamentary record at all. It was an interview on ABC-TV (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTndr9O4hbA&t=3s).
And he did not say that it was “the world’s largest experimental vaccine”. He was talking about the remaining issues that were still unknown at that stage, three months after the vaccine rollout. In reference to those he said, “The world doesn’t know that answer. The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever, and we will have enormous amounts of data”.
If you had bothered to do some actual research into what that meant, instead of just uncritically swallowing what you had been told, you would understand that he WASN’T saying that the vaccines had not undergone proper clinical trials. In fact, what he was referring to was the data collection undertaken as the final phase of clinical trials AFTER they’re approved for public use. This is the case with EVERY medication on the market. This, in fact, concluded last year, after nearly 15 BILLION vaccinations. So Greg Hunt was right. But in the opposite way that people like you tried to “cherry-pick”.
So when you claim that we are all “the subjects of an experimental mRNA injection, which is an on-going trial”, and that “data of the experimental injection to date have not been released”, nothing could be further from the truth.
The mRNA vaccines have been a 40 year development project, and again, if you had bothered to do some research (which really only requires a basic Google search), you would have already understood that. And you would have already been able to discover that the technology was first clinically trialled on humans in 2010, and nearly a decade ago used successfully in West Africa against Zika Virus and Ebola outbreaks.
The third statement that’s straight out of the anti-vax claims is “unexplained deaths worldwide”. there are never any deaths “unexplained” What you are probably referring to is “excess deaths”. And they are far from unexplained.
In Australia, apart from deaths from/with COVID, we know what the causes are, and it is the same for at least the past decade: diabetes and dementia.
This, too, could be found through a simple Google search. This one took me ten seconds to find (https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid)
As for “anti-vax” being an offensive term, in my considerable experience over the past three years, it’s only offensive to those who ARE anti-vax. It is a descriptive term, not a pejorative. So, as I have nowhere “encourage[d] hatred or belittle[d]” anyone here, your reaction is strongly suggestive of the fact that you are triggered by use of the term which in fact describes your own stance on the issue.
And you have to wonder how, if everything you said about the vaccines were true, why the term “anti-vax” would be regarded as offensive, instead of a badge of honour.
There needs to be honest listening! One of my husband’s friends son suddenly died of this last year with no previous heart problems. Our daughter in her 40’s was in induced coma in ICU last year. Miraculously survived. Know of many others who died or have some very strange symptoms. These are real happenings – not an opinion to support! Read what the inventor now says with much regret.
By the way, not everyone who refused or were coerced to having this ” medical procedure” were/are anti vaccine!
Thank you Kurt for the extensive study and examination of this topic. You have made it clear there was no real choice allowed by the Australian Govt and many lost their jobs/incomes, some their homes, and some their loved ones due to the vaccine and they could not say goodbye. Others suffered immense trauma when being in lockdown. Children suffered a surge in mental health illness, loss of school hours, and many have continued to suffer from anxiety and depression and loss of confidence as a new sense of fear took over our society. I have met so many adults have been affected already who have been affected by myocarditis since the vaccine, others by immune compromise since the vaccine (now facing cancer as well) and some have Long COVID or chronic fatigue symptoms or lung irritation.
In Sept 2023 USA put out a statement saying they were withdrawing Moderna and Pfizer injections (due to
the inquiry into the side effects). We heard little about that in Australia but their inquiry into side effects exposed too much damage.
In July 202 The Schmelling report in Denmark studied the batches which had caused harm and found a pattern began to emerged across the world, according to which batch was being used. They too have caused many to investigate long term effects according to which batch was being used in which location.
You raised many valid points about ethics and the law. Thank you.
” I have met so many adults have been affected already who have been affected by myocarditis since the vaccine”
It’s an extraordinary coincidence that only people who are anti-vax who claim to know “so many adults” who had myocarditis from the vaccine when the ratio in every part of the world for adults is 1 person in every 100,000. So the chance of you knowing “so many” is practically zero.
The same goes for “others by immune compromise since the vaccine (now facing cancer as well) and some have Long COVID or chronic fatigue symptoms or lung irritation.” That’s because it’s the immunocompromised who are potentially the most vulnerable to infection from the virus, and therefore the most encouraged group to maintain their vacinations and follow up boosters (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00142-6/fulltext).
And the same goes for cancer. In fact, people with cancer are encouraged to vaccinate as part of their treatment (https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/affected-cancer/covid-19-and-cancer/covid-19-vaccines-and-cancer/FAQs).
And as for “Long COVID or chronic fatigue symptoms or lung irritation”, the first two are one and the same issue, and both are consequences of the disease, NOT the vaccine. And according to the largest study so far (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-022-00846-2), around 10% of those who have had COVID-19, even those who were asymptomatic, have experienced this for at least 3 months or more after the infection has cleared.
And as the study shows, the frequency is higher in those who were unvaccinated!
And there is no such incidence of “lung irritation” (whatever that might be) from the vaccines. But again, in the “Long COVID study it shows the incidence of serious and even permanent damage, not only to the lungs, but every other bodily organ from the disease.
“In Sept 2023 USA put out a statement saying they were withdrawing Moderna and Pfizer injections (due to
the inquiry into the side effects). We heard little about that in Australia but their inquiry into side effects exposed too much damage.”
What nonsense! In fact, it was the opposite! As https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-action-updated-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-better-protect-against-currently-circulating reports, from September 2023:
“Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration took action approving and authorizing for emergency use updated COVID-19 vaccines formulated to more closely target currently circulating variants and to provide better protection against serious consequences of COVID-19, including hospitalization and death. Today’s actions relate to updated mRNA vaccines for 2023-2024 manufactured by ModernaTX Inc. and Pfizer Inc. Consistent with the totality of the evidence and input from the FDA’s expert advisors, these vaccines have been updated to include a monovalent (single) component that corresponds to the Omicron variant XBB.1.5.”
As for the claims arising from misrepresentations of the Schmeling paper, there is this:
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/analysis-adverse-event-variation-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-batches-doesnt-indicate-safety-problems-contrary-john-campbell/
There is also the fact that Schmeling et al cited the fact that their study had “several limitations” (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998).
So, nothing you’ve said here is in any way factual. It is nothing more than the restating of anti-vax propaganda. And that propaganda is costing people’s lives. As the study at https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-022-00075-x shows:
“Our findings suggest that vaccine hesitancy may have a substantial impact on the pandemic trajectory, deaths and hospitalisation.”
a royal commission into covid 19 addressing areas like this area of concern in the terms of reference will hopefully clearly identify what is what and what is needed to restore confidence in health services to a better level