‘Hate Speech’ Laws and the Murder of Justice
Anyone keen on hate speech laws needs to spend a year in Pakistan, living under their Islamic blasphemy laws.
It’s heartbreaking stuff. I’ve been writing about its victims for a few years now, and it hits me hard every time.
Two Christian teens are set to be hanged over cartoons sent to their mobile phones by a Muslim, whom authorities let off.
Their lawyer has rightly called their sentencing “the murder of justice”.
Nouman Asghar and Sunny Mushtaq are from the Punjab province and have been in prison since 2019.
Their alleged crime was “blaspheming the prophet Mohammed” after receiving cartoon drawings of the warlord on their mobile phones through WhatsApp.
Notably, authorities didn’t take any action against Bilal Ahmad, a Muslim, who sent the so-called “blasphemous” images.
In June 2023, Asghar, now 25, was sentenced to death by hanging.
Mushtaq awaits the same grim sentencing.
He’s also been accused of printing the cartoons, and distributing them.
Human Rights Violations
International Christian Concern, quoting from Agenzia Fides, said the men were arrested for “violating article 295-c of the Penal Code, which punishes contempt for the Prophet Mohammed.”
Lawyer Aneeqa Maria Anthony said the “magistrate ignored all the procedures and dismissed all the evidence.”
“He only wanted to complete his ‘sacred duty’ to punish an alleged blasphemer.”
Legal defence team member Lazar Allah Rakha told The Catholic Herald,
“There was no proof against Nouman, and none of the witnesses produced by police could corroborate the blasphemy allegation.”
“This is murder of justice.”
Speaking about the weaponisation of blasphemy legislation, Jeff King, ICC’s president, remarked that these kinds of laws are “often used to settle personal scores or persecute minorities.”
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) explained that it’s aware of at least “80 individuals in Pakistan who remain imprisoned on blasphemy charges.”
The majority face the death penalty.
According to the USCIRF,
“Under sections 295 and 298 of Pakistan’s Penal Code, individuals are prohibited from verbal and nonverbal actions deemed insulting to religious belief and practice.”
All that’s required to enact these laws is an accusation.
Legal justification for arrest is ambiguous.
Listing them, USCIRF said that reasons include:
- ‘inflicting physical damage on the Qur’an or other Islamic religious text, even if unintentional.’
- ‘sending and receiving text messages, sometimes unsolicited, which are later deemed insulting to the Prophet Muhammad or the Islamic faith.’
- ‘making comments in personal conversations that witnesses attest to be blasphemous in nature.’
The Islamist version of “hate speech laws” even comes with their own eSafety overwatch.
Criticism is banned, and social media use regulated.
Reasons for incarceration also include:
- ‘translating and uploading content to personal blogs and non-Muslim websites, or writing Facebook posts deemed to be insulting to the Islamic faith.’
Islamist Pakistan isn’t the only example.
India’s anti-conversion laws, in practice, offer just as many warnings.
Their equivalent in the West is “forced speak” LGBTQ+ laws punishing people for not living by its “legislated lies”, as Kirralie Smith puts it.
Persecution
Outside high-profile cases like Asia Bibi – now living in Canada – Pakistan’s persecution of free speech has hit families like Shagufta and Shafqat Emmanuel‘s.
They were arrested on blasphemy charges in 2013 after police raided their home.
As they are a mum and dad of four, their kids faced death threats, and have had to move around a lot.
The Emmanuels served seven years in prison before being acquitted in 2021, with the help of hero lawyer Saif ul Malook – Asia Bibi’s legal representative.
Islamic blasphemy laws teach us what’s wrong with “hate speech” regulation.
Those suffering under the weight of these laws speak volumes to Westerners about the dangers of false accusations and vague legislation.
The two cases from Pakistan – among many others – certify the insanity of Westerners romancing “hate speech” and “misinformation/disinformation” e-safetyism.
Adopting blasphemy laws to protect the ideas and false utopianism taught by both Marx and Mohammed would quickly wreck the West.
There’s already a movement in the United Kingdom demanding that Islam be considered a “race”, and “Islamophobia” policed as ‘racism’.
This back-door blasphemy law would ban criticism of Islam, while protecting Islamist and far-left extremism.
Just like India’s conversion laws and Islam’s blasphemy laws, “hate speech” laws are a prescription for persecution.
These anti-free speech laws are a licence to murder justice.
They serve a subjectivist dystopia.
As I’ve shown, the lessons are clear: “hate speech” laws are easily weaponised, and just as easily abused.
___
Image courtesy of Adobe.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
25 January 2025
2.5 MINS
How can we foster genuine and peaceful dialogue with others who may share different opinions to us about the appropriateness of Australia Day being on 26 January?
25 January 2025
2.5 MINS
We are approaching two very important commemorations – Australia Day on 26 January and International Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27 January. We do this at a time when our nation is facing a crisis of social cohesion, with a lack of moral clarity and will to act in our government.
25 January 2025
4.2 MINS
As we consider the injustice of babies born alive and left to die, and the injustice of the Crisafulli gag motion, we should meditate on why powerful people find their careers threatened by children to the point where they decree their killing.
24 January 2025
2.3 MINS
We can be enormously grateful for Australia's Christian heritage this 26 January. Happy Australia Day!
24 January 2025
1 MINS
A significant remarkable cultural shift has quietly occurred in the last year or so, restoring recognition of 26 January as our national day. Please feel free to print and circulate the attached prayer guide designed to help Christians pray ahead of Australia Day.
24 January 2025
3.3 MINS
Trump’s pardon for the majority of Joe Biden’s January 6 political prisoners ends four years of left-wing lies and subsequent political persecution.
24 January 2025
2.2 MINS
The first person to take issue with Donald Trump’s insistence that there are only two genders was an Episcopalian priest. Of course. Bishop Marianne Budde used her Washington pulpit, tilted to the left, to berate the President for — of all things — agreeing with Moses.
Hate speech laws are an upgrade of the criminal codes in the USSR throughout the Bolshevik regimes:
.
True, they were supposedly being arrested and tried not for their actual faith but for openly declaring their convictions and for bringing up their children – in the same spirit. As Tanya Khodkevich wrote:
You can pray freely ~
But just so God alone can hear.
(She received a ten-year sentence for these verses.) A person convinced that he possessed spiritual truth was required to conceal it from his own children! In the twenties the religious education of children was classified as a political crime under Article 58-10 of the Code – in other words, counterrevolutionary propaganda!
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn The Gulag Archipelago; Part One 1973 pp 37-38