Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

Australia abandoned car manufacturing too soon. This essay argues for rebuilding a sovereign EV industry—boosting resilience, jobs, and technology—financed responsibly through Modern Monetary Theory.

Australia once stood proudly among advanced economies capable of designing, manufacturing, and exporting automobiles. For decades, Holden, Ford, Toyota, and Mitsubishi maintained a robust presence, supporting tens of thousands of direct jobs and many more through supply chains, engineering, research, logistics, and services.

By 2017, however, Australia’s automotive manufacturing industry had effectively collapsed, the victim of neoliberal industrial policy, insufficient government support, and a belief that globalisation and resource extraction alone could sustain the nation’s economic future.

Today, with escalating geopolitical uncertainty, climate transition imperatives, diminished sovereign capability, fragile supply chains, and a persistent structural dependence on raw commodity exports, the decision to abandon car manufacturing appears increasingly short-sighted.

Rebuilding a car industry is not merely about nostalgia or economic nationalism; it is about national resilience, technological leadership, employment, economic diversification, and the strategic industrial capacity required in the twenty-first century.

This essay argues that Australia should rebuild its car industry, with a contemporary focus on electric vehicles (EVs), low-emission vehicles, and advanced manufacturing, while ensuring domestic capability in batteries, software systems, and critical components.

It further outlines a realistic framework grounded in Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) to finance and sustain such an endeavour without imposing austerity or false “household budget” constraints on the public purse. Re-industrialisation is not only possible—it is economically rational, strategically necessary, and socially beneficial.

Part I: Why Australia Needs a Car Industry Again

1. Sovereign Capability and National Security

The COVID-19 pandemic revealed the fragility of global supply chains. Australia—despite being wealthy and technologically capable—struggled to access critical goods because production was concentrated offshore.

Automobile manufacturing is more than vehicle production. It underpins advanced steelmaking, robotics, machine tooling, semiconductor integration, battery chemistry, logistics excellence, high-precision engineering, and systems integration.

Nations with car industries possess versatile industrial ecosystems that can pivot in crises to military production, emergency equipment manufacturing, or strategic goods production. Nations without such capabilities must rely on others and hope geopolitical tensions do not constrain supply.

Automobile production has traditionally been aligned with defence and emergency sovereignty. The same supply chains that build vehicles support armoured vehicles, logistics trucks, aerospace components, and energy storage systems. In a strategic environment increasingly shaped by tensions in the Indo-Pacific, it is foolish to outsource such industrial depth.

2. Economic Diversification Beyond Minerals

Australia’s economy is highly dependent on commodities—iron ore, coal, gas, and increasingly lithium. While these sectors generate export revenue, they leave the economy exposed to price volatility, external demand shocks, and technological shifts away from fossil fuels.

Advanced manufacturing provides high value-added output, longer supply chain multipliers, stable employment, and knowledge spillovers to other industries such as defence, aerospace, renewable energy, and medical technology.

A domestic automotive sector would anchor the development of related industries:

• Advanced battery manufacturing
• Rare-earth processing and magnet production
• Power electronics and software systems
• Green hydrogen integration
• Lightweight materials and composites

Rather than exporting raw materials cheaply and importing expensive finished goods, Australia can “climb the value chain”, capturing more of the economic benefits of its natural resources.

3. Employment, Skills, and Social Stability

The loss of automotive manufacturing devastated communities in South Australia and Victoria. Beyond direct assembly jobs, thousands of engineers, machinists, tool makers, technicians, and skilled tradespeople lost their livelihoods. Younger generations lost pathways into technical careers.

Manufacturing jobs are disproportionately better for working-class Australians, providing higher wages, union protections, and career progression than much of the service sector.

Rebuilding the industry would:

• Restore high-skill, high-wage employment
• Revitalise vocational education and apprenticeships
• Support research careers in engineering and technology
• Reduce underemployment and precarious labour

This is not simply an economic issue, but a social one. Manufacturing economies produce more stable societies. Nations that hollow out their industrial bases face inequality, community decline, and political instability.

4. Climate Transition and Technological Leadership

The twenty-first-century automobile is fundamentally different from the twentieth. It is increasingly electric, software-defined, autonomous-capable, networked, and integrated with renewable energy systems.

Instead of internal combustion engines, the industrial heart lies in battery technology, power electronics, software, AI, sensors, and energy ecosystems. This presents Australia with a rare chance: because the industry is transforming globally, it is possible to re-enter not as a follower but as a leader.

Australia already possesses advantages:

• Abundant critical minerals (lithium, nickel, cobalt, manganese, rare earths)
• Strong renewable energy resources
• Sophisticated research universities
• Proven capacity in advanced engineering sectors like defence and aerospace

A domestic EV and green vehicle industry would align with climate policy, help decarbonise transport, and build export capability in emerging industries.

5. National Pride and Cultural Identity

For many decades, cars were part of Australian cultural identity. But the deeper issue is psychological and political: a country that believes it “cannot make things” enters a mindset of dependency and lowered ambition.

Re-industrialising is a statement of confidence, capability, and aspiration. Nations like Germany, Japan, South Korea, and now China have understood that manufacturing power underpins geopolitical influence, technological leadership, and national dignity. Australia should embrace that lesson.

Part II: Why the Old Arguments Against a Car Industry No Longer Hold

1. “Australia Is Too Small a Market”

This argument mattered in the twentieth century when the industry was based on economies of scale for petrol vehicles. But modern manufacturing allows flexible production, modular platforms, and export-oriented models.

Tesla, BYD, Rivian, and numerous EV startups have proven that new entrants can compete globally through innovation rather than brute scale.

Moreover, Australia can target niche strengths: utes, off-road EVs, mining vehicles, light commercial fleets, buses, and specialised vehicles for harsh Australian conditions that are attractive globally.

2. “It’s Cheaper to Import”

Cheap imports are not cheap if they cost sovereign capability, resilience, jobs, skills, and strategic independence. Cost must be evaluated holistically, not through narrow price signals. Moreover, automation and advanced manufacturing reduce labour cost disadvantages.

Manufacturing is not about low wages; it is about high productivity, innovation, and value creation.

3. “Government Shouldn’t Pick Winners”

Every successful automotive nation has had government strategy—Japan, Germany, South Korea, the United States (through massive EV and battery subsidies), and China (through aggressive industrial policy).

Markets alone do not build industries of national significance. Governments must coordinate investment, infrastructure, standards, procurement policy, and incentives. The idea that Australia uniquely must avoid industrial strategy reflects ideological bias, not economic logic.

Part III: Modern Monetary Theory and Financing Industrial Revival

1. Understanding MMT: Clearing Misconceptions

Modern Monetary Theory does not claim “governments can spend infinitely”. It offers a descriptive framework explaining that a sovereign government issuing its own fiat currency cannot “run out of money” the way households or businesses can.

The true constraint is not financial solvency but real resources: labour, skills, raw materials, productive capacity, and inflationary pressure.

From an MMT perspective:

• The federal government does not need to “raise revenue” before spending.
• Taxes and bonds do not fund spending—they regulate demand, inflation, and savings preferences.
• If there are unemployed resources, government spending can mobilise them without necessarily causing inflation.

This matters because critics of rebuilding industry claim “we can’t afford it”. Under MMT, the real question becomes: Do we have the skills, resources, and capacity to build a car industry? Not whether the government can “find the money”.

2. Why MMT Financing Suits Industrial Policy

Rebuilding a car industry involves large upfront investment, long time horizons, uncertain returns, and systemic benefits that private investors often undervalue. Traditional budget orthodoxy—balanced budgets, deficit aversion, and reliance on private capital—discourages such projects. MMT provides a framework in which the government can:

• Direct spending strategically
• Guarantee employment
• Absorb risk that private capital avoids
• Stabilise demand over long development cycles

Rather than pleading for multinational corporations to invest, Australia can build domestic capability supported by public currency issuance, ensuring national ownership and strategic control.

Part IV: A Realistic Framework for Rebuilding Australia’s Car Industry

1. Strategic Vision and Institutional Architecture

The revival requires a coherent national strategy, not ad-hoc subsidies. Key institutional pillars should include:

• Australian Automotive and Advanced Manufacturing Authority (AAAMA)
  A federal public authority coordinating investment, planning, procurement, workforce development, and research partnerships.
• State-Federal Coordination
  South Australia and Victoria as primary manufacturing hubs, with Western Australia for critical minerals integration and Queensland/New South Wales assisting in supply chains.
• Public-Private Hybrid Model
  Encourage partnerships with domestic startups, established foreign EV companies willing to manufacture locally, and public ownership stakes to ensure control and accountability.

2. Industrial Focus Areas

The industry should be forward-looking, anchored in:

• Electric vehicles (passenger and commercial)
• Battery manufacturing and recycling
• Hydrogen vehicles for heavy transport
• Autonomous and smart vehicle software
• Specialised mining and off-road EVs
• Buses, public transport vehicles, and logistics fleets

Australia should avoid merely replicating old internal combustion production and instead leapfrog into future segments.

3. Workforce and Skill Development

A car industry demands a skilled workforce. Policies should include:

• Rebuilding TAFE capacity
• Government-funded apprenticeships in engineering, robotics, machining, mechatronics
• University research funding tied to automotive innovation
• Pathways for displaced workers from fossil fuel industries
• Immigration programs targeted to fill gaps while training locals long-term

Funding this through MMT is direct federal expenditure into education, justified as public investment in productive capability.

4. Infrastructure and Supply Chain Development

Government investment should build:

• Battery gigafactories
• Rare-earth refining
• Semiconductor assembly capability
• Robotics and advanced tooling facilities
• Renewable-powered industrial precincts
• Port and logistics upgrades

These are capital investments with long-term productivity returns. Under MMT, the federal government can directly fund this, with inflation constraints monitored rather than arbitrary deficit targets.

5. Public Procurement as Industrial Driver

Successful automotive industries historically thrive through guaranteed initial demand. Government procurement can:

• Mandate Australian-made EV fleets for federal, state, and local government
• Electrify postal vehicles, police vehicles, health fleets, and defence logistics
• Support bus and public transport vehicle production
• Encourage corporate fleet transition with domestic sourcing incentives

This creates stable demand, supporting scale and learning-by-doing effects.

6. Research, Innovation, and Technology Policy

Australia must invest in:

• EV battery chemistry research
• Grid integration technology
• Charging infrastructure innovation
• Smart vehicle operating systems
• AI driver-assist technologies
• Lightweight materials research

A publicly funded National EV Innovation Centre can coordinate with universities and industry. This is classic MMT-compatible spending—mobilising unused intellectual capacity toward national benefit.

7. Environmental and Social Safeguards

A new industry must be sustainable, ensuring:

• Ethical labour standards
• Environmental protection during mining and processing
• Battery recycling systems
• Indigenous consultation in resource landscapes
• Transparency and public accountability

Industrial revival must support climate goals, not undermine them.

Part V: Managing Inflation and Economic Balance under MMT

Critics may argue that large-scale public investment risks inflation. MMT provides tools to manage this:

1. Phased Investment
   Spending should ramp gradually, matching real capacity rather than flooding the economy.
2. Target Underutilised Resources
   Aim spending at unemployed labour, idle infrastructure, and underused regions.
3. Tax Adjustments if Needed
   If demand-pull inflation arises, taxes can moderate excessive private sector demand.
4. Import Management
   Some imported components will still be required; policies should ensure foreign exchange stability through export strategies, trade agreements, and resource earnings.
5. Productivity Growth
   Industrial investment increases productive capacity, offsetting inflationary pressures long-term.

The key point: inflation is managed through resource planning, taxation, and productivity—not artificial scarcity of public funding.

Part VI: Economic, Social, and Strategic Payoffs

Rebuilding the car industry would deliver:

1. Economic Payoffs

• High-wage employment
• Broader manufacturing base
• Export diversification
• Technological spillovers
• Reduced trade deficits on imported vehicles

2. Social Payoffs

• Reindustrialised regional communities
• Education and skill advancement
• Economic dignity through meaningful work

3. Strategic Payoffs

• National resilience
• Defence sovereign capability
• Reduced foreign dependency
• Geopolitical credibility as a technologically capable nation

Part VII: Addressing Potential Criticisms

“It Didn’t Work Before—Why Now?”

Because the industry today is fundamentally different: cleaner, software-based, innovation-driven, and strategically essential. Past policy withdrew support just as transformation began.

“The Private Sector Should Lead, Not Government”

Private capital follows profit signals, not national interest. Governments worldwide are shaping EV futures. Australia must do the same.

“MMT Is Risky”

What is truly risky is clinging to outdated fiscal myths while nations that understand sovereign monetary capability shape the future. The risk is not public spending—it is doing nothing.

Conclusion

Australia’s decision to abandon car manufacturing was not inevitable; it was ideological. It reflected a narrow faith in markets, a surrender of industrial ambition, and a belief that Australia’s destiny was to remain a quarry and a farm rather than a maker of complex technology. That worldview is obsolete in an era defined by geopolitical uncertainty, technological revolution, climate transition, and renewed appreciation for sovereign capability.

Rebuilding a car industry is not simply about producing vehicles. It is about rebuilding industrial strength, national confidence, technological leadership, and resilience. It is about providing meaningful employment, stimulating innovation, and positioning Australia as a serious player in the twenty-first-century economy.

Modern Monetary Theory provides the financial framework to make this possible. A monetarily sovereign government like Australia’s does not face financial constraints comparable to a household. It faces resource constraints and policy design challenges—but those can be managed intelligently. With strategic planning, phased investment, inflation management, and public-private collaboration, a renewed automotive industry is entirely achievable.

Australia has the skills, resources, and capability. What it needs is political will, strategic vision, and courage to reject defeatism. Rebuilding the automotive industry would declare that Australia is not merely a resource exporter—it is an advanced nation committed to building, innovating, and shaping its own economic destiny.

___

Image courtesy of Adobe.