
The War Against Women
Transgender ideology is infringing more and more on women’s rights and women’s spaces. We need to stand up for our women now.
I laughed when Glamor Magazine named Caitlyn Jenner their 2015 Woman of the Year.
I shouldn’t have.
Not because it was rude to laugh, but because those responsible were not laughing. They were deadly serious.
What I assumed was a novelty award — perhaps to garner publicity for the magazine — was in fact the first obvious shot fired in a war against women.
Space Invaders
Seven years later, the fastest female college swimmer in America is Lia Thomas, a man. The highest-profile female weightlifter in New Zealand is Laurel Hubbard, a man. One of the best female BMX riders in the US is Chelsea Wolfe, a man. The 2020 Miss Intercontinental New Zealand Arielle Keil, is a man.
And we could go on.
None of this is to say that these people are not lovely people. They probably are. But they are not women, they are men. And I’m not meaning to sound unkind in saying that. I’m just following the science.
The interesting question is how we got to this point.
It seems to have all happened in four simple but profound steps.
Lawfare
First, the term “woman” was redefined as a gender identity. The definition of “woman” was no longer a fixed biological reality. “Woman” was a subjective feeling; an identity that could be appropriated by men.
Second, that gender identity was protected by law. It became socially unacceptable, and in some parts of the world illegal, to discriminate against male “women” on the grounds of their gender identity. This is significant when you remember that gender identity is a feeling, unlike other protected attributes like race.
So if someone said they were a woman — even if they stood 6’5, were built like an outhouse, had a penis dangling between their legs and once answered to the name Trevor — it was dangerous to one’s social standing and employment to say they were not a woman.
Having redefined “woman” as a gender identity that was protected by law, activists then asserted a conflict of rights between women and male “women”.
It was not fair that women got to use female bathrooms whilst male “women” did not, for instance. And it was unjust that women got to compete in female sports while male “women” did not.
How to resolve this clash of rights?
One-Sided
Activists then insisted that we must only listen to male “women” to resolve the conflict. Any actual women who spoke out were immediately derided as bigots.
So the most important voices in solving the conflict between women’s rights and male “women’s” rights became male “women”.
To summarise then:
- Men co-opted female identity
- Men co-opting a female identity were protected by law
- Men co-opting a female identity asserted they were being discriminated against by women and that lives would be lost if this discrimination did not end
- Men co-opting a female identity positioned themselves as the experts advising how women must end discrimination against them
What is it when men tell women who they are and how they must behave?
Oh yes, Misogyny!
Women’s Losses
There is no question that some men identifying as women are very troubled souls. There is also no doubt that, in the name of kindness, the whole issue has been leveraged to wage war on women.
Think that’s harsh?
Talk to Emma Weyant, who was the fastest female 500m college swimmer in America but had to settle for a silver medal because no one was allowed to say that first-placed Lia Thomas was a man.
Talk to 18-year-old girl Roviel Detenamo, whose dream of representing New Zealand at the Olympics was shattered because no one, not even Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, would say that Laurel Hubbard was a man.
Transageism
What if we do this …
- Redefine “child” as an age identity
- Make age identity a protected category under law
- Assert a clash of rights between adult “children” and real children. Insist that adult “children” are treated unfairly because they are not able to access actual children’s spaces.
- Only consult adult “children” for guidance on how to resolve this conflict.
Madness, right?
Activists have traded on and manipulated our goodwill to make fools of us.
You are not a bigot for believing that only women should be allowed to use women’s spaces and that only women should be allowed to compete in women’s sports.
If we care about women, we should call out this insanity whenever and wherever it arises, before our mothers, sisters, wives and girlfriends are disappeared.
___
Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo by cottonbro.
Recent Articles:
21 August 2026
1.8 MINS
Archbishop Fisher accuses ABC of bias in voluntary assisted dying coverage, demands formal investigation into impartiality breaches over telehealth ban debate.
21 August 2026
2.9 MINS
When five men are accused, "all men" bear the guilt — but when a woman errs, she's just an individual. This piece asks why identity logic only turns rigid on demand.
20 August 2026
4 MINS
Young Australians face a housing crisis decades in the making. This piece argues political choices—not fate—locked a generation out of the Australian Dream, and calls for national renewal.
20 August 2026
3.1 MINS
The ABC surprises with a balanced report on Gym Church, a Melbourne-born Christian fitness ministry now spreading nationally — exploring why Gen Z men are turning to faith.
20 August 2026
3.2 MINS
I've spent years fighting Australia's transgender policies in sport — facing court orders and police visits for it. Now Enes Kanter's WNBA declaration shows the tide may finally be turning.
20 August 2026
4 MINS
A new federal Bill seeks to guarantee babies born alive after an abortion the same right to medical care as any other newborn — reviving a debate first raised by Baby Samuel's story in Queensland earlier this year.
19 August 2026
4 MINS
On 17 August, Parliament House witnessed historic momentum for the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026. Record numbers of politicians attended and spoke publicly in support, while media coverage reached unprecedented levels — marking a significant shift in political engagement on this highly important issue.





