
‘Rejoice in the Birth of a Brown-Skinned, Middle-Eastern, Undocumented Immigrant’?
Trendy phrases are often wheeled out at Christmas time suggesting the season can be wokeified. But Christmas is above politics. It belongs to all of us.
“Rejoice in the birth of a brown-skinned, Middle-Eastern, undocumented immigrant.”
You might have seen this message around the place in the lead-up to Christmas. Among its implications is the notion that the woke, thanks to their superior values, are are better placed to welcome baby Jesus at Christmas time.
I guess if everything can be wokeified, then surely the Christmas story is fair game, too?
Well, wait a minute.
As we read the account of Jesus’ birth in the Gospel of Matthew, we discover first of all that Jesus was a Jew. That makes him white-adjacent — and a coloniser. Problematic.
Then we’ve got an unplanned pregnancy, with all parties simply assuming Mary will go through with it, and no one defending her reproductive freedom.
Not to mention the account is peppered with patriarchal presumptions: a virgin betrothed, by her father no doubt, to a man she barely knows, who has unilateral rights to divorce her for any prenuptial promiscuity.
Then there’s the angel who has the gall to assign a gender to a baby yet unborn.
And don’t forget the kings journeying from the east, parading about their wealth and privilege, while inflicting cruelty on their caravan of camels — which no doubt emitted far too much methane and were to blame for most of the nativity’s carbon footprint.
You get the point.
I am not at all convinced that wokery would have ensured a red carpet was rolled out for Jesus, or even that his manger was padded with an extra layer of hay.
People of Every Persuasion Had No Room for Jesus
To be sure, at that first Christmas, Jesus wasn’t given a particularly great welcome by the non-woke either. Rural-conservative Bethlehem’s hospitality left much to be desired: no room in the inn, an animal shelter doubling as a maternity ward. Then King Herod, a fascist if you’ve ever met one, unleashed his bloody slaughter of the innocents in an attempt to snuff out any rival to his throne.
No, one of the key revelations in the Christmas story is that characters of every race, status and political persuasion had no room for Jesus.
That’s why the virtue-signalling rejoinder I quoted in the title rings so hollow.
In the words of a favourite Christmas song of mine by Casting Crowns, “there was no room for him in the world he came to save”.
Part of the human condition is the misguided belief that we don’t need God — certainly not a God born to peasants in a shed that smelt of donkey dung.
Let Every Heart Prepare Him Room
But the Christmas story is also about the hearts that opened up to make room for baby Jesus.
Joseph enduring the shame of marrying his pregnant fiancée out of selfless love for both mother and child.
Mary in her beautiful Magnificat declaring hope over fear: “My soul glorifies the Lord and my spirit rejoices in God my Saviour, for he has been mindful of the humble state of his servant.”
The support of extended family — Elizabeth and Zechariah most prominently — rejoicing with the young couple at what lay ahead.
Shepherds keeping watch over their flocks by night, who responded without hesitation on hearing the promise of the angels. “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.”
And of course the wise men with their impressive cross-continental odyssey and lavish gifts.
Here’s the point: the birth of Jesus is an invitation to people of every background.
Christmas is above politics, more enduring than passing fads, and belongs not to any particular social tribe but to the whole human race.
All that matters is how each heart responds.
To quote several better-known and dearly loved Christmas carols, “Let every heart prepare him room,” and, “Where meek souls will receive him still, the dear Christ enters in.”
God bless you as you open your heart wide to Jesus this Christmas.
Originally published at Mercator. Image credit: Gerard van Honthorst, “Adoration of the Shepherds”.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
17 July 2026
15.2 MINS
The Church is wimpy, and it's destroying the nation. That's the blunt assessment of Rev. Chris Wickland, a UK clergyman who refuses to soften the gospel for perceived cultural acceptance. And he has a point. From the rise of "woke" institutional Christianity to the abdication of prophetic witness, the modern Church has traded its backbone for a desperate attempt to attain a disappearing seat at the table.
17 July 2026
4.5 MINS
Landlords have shut the door on the LGBTQ+ desecration of a former Sydney Catholic Church and theatre named after saints.
17 July 2026
4 MINS
In a sign of the continuing breakdown of religious freedom in Europe, Finnish parliament member Päivi Räsänen was banned by the U.K. from traveling to Heathrow Airport for a planned layover due to her Finnish Supreme Court conviction in March for authoring a pamphlet containing supposed “hate speech” toward those who identify as LGBT.
17 July 2026
2.9 MINS
Questions on the environment produced the most lopsided results of any category tested, with every single model favouring climate concerns over growth. Removing one model’s “safety” layer moved its religion score from secular-leaning to neutral.
17 July 2026
4.7 MINS
As tensions between America and Iran escalate, foreign policy experts urge discernment in distinguishing between regimes that keep their word and those — like Tehran — that operate through deception and aggression, a lesson as old as Scripture itself.
16 July 2026
5 MINS
We're told that progressive politics equals compassion, inclusion and kindness. But shocking reactions to Ann Widdecombe's murder — celebrating her death and hoping she died in extreme pain — reveal the socialist left's blatant 'hate speech' hypocrisy and disturbing double standards of the highest degree.
16 July 2026
3.6 MINS
Jason Clare’s “vanilla” attack on One Nation's immigration policy dissolved under scrutiny, leaving only fruit salad and spin.






No Kurt, Joseph didn’t marry his ‘fiancee’. There was no such thing as an ‘engagement’ in New Testament times. Joseph and Mary were already married (‘betrothed’) when the angel visited Mary, before they had begun to live together. Her Heavenly Father would never have put Mary in such an invidious position as you suggest. You have done such a lot of research in other areas but you need to pay more attention to the circumstances of Jesu’s conception and birth. Perhaps a good Greek/English interlinear New Testament would help. Please don’t rely on shoddy modern translations of the New Testament.