
Julian Assange: Victim of Political Persecution or Ego Tripper?
Now that the controversy surrounding Julian Assange has died down, and he is back in Australia after pleading guilty to breaching the U.S. Espionage Act, it may be useful to look more closely at the man who has spent the last 12 years trying to avoid the legal systems of Sweden, Britain and the United States.
Assange acquired international celebrity status when, as publisher of WikiLeaks, in 2010 he published hundreds of thousands of secret U.S. government documents that he had received from a disgruntled low-level U.S. Army clerk, Bradley Manning, about the U.S. prosecution of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and intelligence files dealing with Washington’s relations with its allies.
Assange’s supporters, particularly human-rights lawyer Jennifer Robinson, who helped secure the agreement for his release and return to Australia, have argued that Assange is simply a journalist, doing what all journalists do. It follows that charging him with a crime is stifling journalism from exposing secrets that ought to be out in the open.
However, Assange was not charged over his journalism. He was accused of receiving stolen goods (in this case, government documents), and hacking into government servers in order to steal files.
Illegal
Regardless of whether Assange is a journalist or not, both of these actions are illegal in almost all countries, including Australia, Britain and the United States.
In Australia, for example, the Australian Institute of Criminology says that it is an offence to access “data that is subject to an access control restriction (Commonwealth, ACT, NSW, Victoria).”
More serious offences include selling stolen information and inserting computer viruses, ransomware or spyware into networks.
Interestingly, Assange was involved in computer hacking long before the WikiLeaks saga. According to his biography on Wikipedia, in the late 1980s, he had become a skilled hacker, getting the password to access the server of the Overseas Telecommunications Commission, which was ultimately privatised and became Optus.
The Sydney Morning Herald described him later (2015) as “one of Australia’s most notorious hackers”.
At about the same time, Assange formed a group called the International Subversives. This group targeted MILNET, a data network used by the U.S. military. He later claimed the group “had control of it for two years”.
Following an Australian Federal Police investigation, he was charged in 1994 with 31 counts of crimes related to hacking, including defrauding Telecom Australia, fraudulent use of a telecommunications network, obtaining access to information, erasing data, and altering data.
In December 1996, he pled guilty to 24 hacking charges including breaches of the Crimes Act, and fraudulent use of a telecommunications network. A judge fined him $2,100, and put him on a $5,000 good-behaviour bond, because of his disturbed childhood and lack of malicious or mercenary intent.
After bringing together people involved in publishing leaked information, he was one of the founders of WikiLeaks in 2006, which had good access to the media, and became a clearing house for people who wanted to get global coverage for leaked and hacked information.
American Accomplice
Bradley Manning supplied huge quantities of U.S. military and diplomatic documents to Assange that were subsequently published on WikiLeaks, causing immense embarrassment to successive U.S. administrations.
Manning was later cashiered from the U.S. Army, dishonourably discharged, and sentenced to a lengthy term of imprisonment.
In one of his last actions before leaving office in 2017, U.S. President Barack Obama gave Manning a presidential pardon, meaning that he was freed from prison immediately. Why President Obama did this has never been satisfactorily explained.
In the meantime, Assange had sought diplomatic immunity in the London Embassy of Ecuador. Ecuador was then led by a left-wing politician whose hatred for America was visceral. Assange lived in the Embassy until 2019, when Ecuador grew tired of his delinquent behaviour and revoked his asylum.
He was subsequently arrested by British police and carried from the Embassy to a British prison where he fought U.S. attempts to extradite him to face charges of conspiracy to commit computer crimes and breaching the Espionage Act, through his collaboration with Manning.
In light of the fact that Manning had been given a presidential pardon, it was not surprising that his collaborator, Julian Assange, was offered a plea bargain by the U.S. Justice Department, with the clear support of both the Biden Administration and the Australian Government.
He pled guilty to 24 breaches of the Espionage Act, and was sentenced to 62 months in prison, which coincides exactly with the time he had been in detention in Britain, after his expulsion from the Embassy.
Subsequent attempts by his supporters to paint him as a victim of a vast American conspiracy have fallen on deaf ears.
___
Republished with thanks to News Weekly. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
6 August 2026
2.4 MINS
One Nation has built its appeal on personality rather than policy detail. A recent pitch from Pauline Hanson covered immigration, child care and Net Zero — but will she deliver on it?
6 August 2026
3.3 MINS
Facing closure, St Mary's church congregation has refused to surrender. The 900-year-old medieval building's dedicated parish has secured a crucial heritage grant to begin its long-overdue restoration.
6 August 2026
2.2 MINS
Transgender actress Elliot Page has sparked debate by citing chimpanzee behaviour to justify gender ideology. We’ve lost God, and now our spiritual collapse means we’re taking moral cues from monkeys. What could possibly go wrong?
6 August 2026
5.3 MINS
Boy George's new song "We Will Dance Again" challenges the anti-Israel narrative dominating cultural discourse. The British pop icon has risked his career to stand for Israel and Jewish people — but the backlash has been swift and severe.
6 August 2026
13.2 MINS
Fauci's dairies reveal a tale of national devastation and generational harm, tracing one soul's descent through ambition, ego, and corruption—from social climbing and fame through megalomania, deceit, and malice, culminating in defeat.
5 August 2026
6.9 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.






I find this article leaves much to be desired. There are many important issues that come up in Assange’s case that are glossed over or ignored. The fact that the information released revealed heinous crimes by the US military is important – whatever his motives, Manning was a whistleblower and Wikileaks facilitated these war crimes coming to light. Any time a journalist is given evidence by a whistleblower it could be categorised as “receiving stolen goods” by the same standard as provided by the writer.
Another issue is that Assange was not a citizen or present in the US. We are subject to the laws of our country, but if we are also subject to the laws of other countries we are all in a perilous position. China and Russia don’t have the right to charge Australians not in their country with crimes according to their laws and neither does the US, yet that seems to be what happened to Assange.
Like other real life people Assange has his faults. I’m not trying to suggest that he was fully and always in the right, but there are certainly more important things about Assange than this one-sided piece portrays.