Australian Federal Senate

The Death of Free Speech in the Australian Senate

23 September 2024

2.4 MINS

There was a shocking scene in the Australian Federal Senate recently, which I am still honestly coming to terms with. Senator Hanson attempted to table a motion regarding the upcoming census and the inclusion of people who identify as being ‘transgender’ or ‘gender diverse’. However, both Labor and the Greens took the extraordinary step of prohibiting the issue from even being discussed.

This is an incredibly serious precedent for the Senate to have set. As the Hon. Jonathan Duniam argued:

While the Senate has the opportunity to reject a bill at the first reading stage, in practice the first reading is almost always passed without opposition and is regarded as a purely formal stage and the Coalition supports these normal procedures as we have with many Greens, Labor and other cross-bench bills that we have had opposition to.

The normal process enables a bill to be fairly considered and debated by the Senate before a substantive decision is taken and it should only be deviated from in the most extreme of circumstances… lest we deny the right of senators to even have matters debated.

As in all cases, a vote on the first reading should not be taken as a position on the substantive legislation especially where a bill has not had the opportunity to be subject of a normal internal process.

Dastardly Damage

As was quickly demonstrated, though, Senator Hanson was not only refused the opportunity to seek leave to make a short statement, but any debate on the bill was subsequently squashed. Victor Davis Hanson makes the point in his book The Dying Citizen: How Progressive Elites, Tribalism, and Globalisation Are Destroying the Idea of America (Basic Books, 2021):

Sometimes citizens can do as much harm to their commonwealth by violating custom and tradition as by breaking laws.

In practical terms, the US Constitution guarantees citizens security under a republic whose officials they alone choose and that assures them liberties. What exactly are these privileges? Everything from free speech, due process, and habeas corpus to the right to own and bear arms, to stand trial before a jury of one’s peers, and to vote without restrictions as to race, religion, and sex.

America, then, is only as good as the citizens of any era who choose to preserve and to nourish it for one more generation. Republics are so often lost not over centuries but within a single decade.

This is precisely why the rejection of Senator Hanson’s bill is so corrosive. If the federal senate of our nation cannot model respectful debate and the free exchange of ideas, even those it strongly disagrees with, then the very nature of our democracy is not only “harmed”, but irreparably undermined.

While the Hon. Katy Gallagher acknowledged that Senator Duniam was “correct in many of his remarks”, she nonetheless supported the suppression of free speech. This is a sad day for the federal parliament. As Senator Hanson later argued:

I’ve been denied the right to actually introduce this bill. For the first reading speech, I was denied the right. That is very unusual in this place. Labor and the Greens have taken the highly unusual step of voting down a bill at its first reading that sought to reinforce the biological definitions of ‘man’ and ‘woman’.

This is a rare and alarming move that undermines our democratic process. By refusing the chance to debate this bill, Labor and the Greens are not only silencing important discussions but also disregarding the voices of Australians who support One Nation’s position on upholding biological reality.

This is the real risk and true harm to republics and commonwealth democracies everywhere. As Victor Davis Hanson says, “They are lost not over centuries but within a single decade.” And it’s a lesson it seems that we must learn here in Australia as well.

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.

4 Comments

  1. Warwick Marsh 23 September 2024 at 9:36 am - Reply

    Great article!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Christine Crawford 23 September 2024 at 11:16 am - Reply

    The Greens and ALP are showing their lack of support of freedom and thus democracy. They are not supporting “all members of the community”.

  3. Dan Nebauer 23 September 2024 at 2:18 pm - Reply

    This is a very sad reflection of the direction this nation is moving – the overt control of the left leaning ALP and the decidedly dangerous thinking of the Greens is a dangerous threat to our nation’s freedoms.

  4. Countess Antonia Maria Violetta Scrivanich 24 September 2024 at 12:32 am - Reply

    Senator Pauline Hanson has been gagged from her democratic right to speak in the Senate, proof that “1984 ” has arrived in Australia , that we are witnessing the death of our freedoms in 2024 in Australia. Our government has turned against its own citizens. None of this would have happened under PM Hawke. His Attorney-General, Gareth Evans , had respect for the principles of freedom, justice and compassion which is how I made legal history in 1984 when I won the first Freedom of Information court case in Australia. The PSB argued that to release my Personnel File to me would “endanger the security of Australia ” which was nonsense as it was a case of Sexual Harassment, defamation and intrigue in the ATO . On the last day I hired a brilliant , young lawyer, Tony Besanko, who cited Conway v. Rimmer (House of Lords ) + Sankey v. Whitlam(High Court of Australia ). ( He is the judge who recently decided the Ben-Roberts -Smith Defamation case ). My case established the principle that justice to the individual was more important than anything else , so, the Federal Court released my Personnel File to me and I discovered that the ATO had deliberately destroyed the evidence that I was a university graduate which was how I was bypassed for promotion 166 times as punishment !
    Today I would not win. I would be seen as an ” enemy ” of the State.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life

MOST POPULAR

ABOUT

The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.

MOST COMMENTS

GOOD NEWS

HALL OF FAME

BROWSE TOPICS

BROWSE GENRES