
NRMA and Allianz Offer Cheaper Car Insurance Premiums to ‘Non-Binary’ Australian Drivers
Two of Australia’s largest insurers have confirmed that they charge male drivers hundreds of dollars more than ‘non-binary’ applicants for identical car insurance coverage.
Insurance giants NRMA and Allianz are offering dramatically cheaper car insurance premiums to Australian drivers who select “non-binary” on application forms.
The revelation first came from a listener, Ben, who contacted 2GB Sydney’s Ben Fordham Live to explain that when he used the same personal and vehicle details and changed only the gender field, he was quoted dramatically different premiums.
“At NRMA, for example, for a male customer, the policy costs $2,700, but for a non-binary customer, it costs only $1,900 — a difference of $800,” the listener wrote in an email to the program.
“At Allianz, it’s similar. For a male customer, the policy costs $2,800. For a non-binary, it costs $2,300 — a difference of $500. Same suburb, same car, same age, same driving history, same excess, same everything.”
The listener, Ben — who happens to share a first name with the show’s host — went on to detail how each insurer justified its pricing policy:
I asked both insurers to explain why gender identity affects a person’s risk profile. NRMA insisted it’s non-discriminatory, then pointed me to their premium and excess guide. Allianz went a step further and told me they couldn’t answer because it was a sensitive topic.
In other words, insurers are charging male customers hundreds more; non-binary customers get the cheapest rate. No data or explanation is provided. One insurer hides behind a document that doesn’t explain it. The other refuses to answer questions entirely.
Both insurers have since confirmed to The Daily Declaration that the cheaper price for ‘non-binary’ customers is intentional.
‘Absolutely Stunned At What I Found’
Ben Fordham noted the startling implications live on air. “I’m certainly shocked to hear about it,” he said, before speaking with the listener during Monday morning’s program.
Ben, 22, explained the process that led to his discovery. “I was just going through doing some quotes the other night in the process of purchasing a new car.”
“I found the box on there and I thought, ‘I’m just gonna give it a tick and see what it comes out with.’ Might be a bit of a joke. And yeah, well, a joke is right. I was absolutely stunned at what I found.”
Fordham clarified: “All of the other details were listed exactly the same?”
“Yes,” the caller confirmed.
Fordham summarised the situation for listeners: “Two of the country’s biggest insurers charging dramatically different car insurance premiums based purely on the gender identity you select. If you tick male, you pay more. If you tick non-binary, you pay less.”
When Fordham asked about female drivers, Ben reported that NRMA’s quote for a female customer came in at around $2,300 — still higher than the non-binary rate.
*** EXCLUSIVE ***
This is unbelievable.
Insurance companies are offering cheaper deals for non-binary customers.
You won’t believe the price difference !
Listen to the details HERE.
🎧https://t.co/UDB15FGzTV🎧 pic.twitter.com/Ys42qyLVTo
— Ben Fordham Live (@BenFordhamLive) November 30, 2025
‘Non-Binary’ Loophole Confirmed by Producers
2GB Sydney confirmed the discrepancy via social media, showing the results when their own producers tested the so-called “non-binary loophole.”
Side-by-side quotes for the same comprehensive car insurance policy revealed a striking difference: $2,725 per year for a male applicant, compared with $1,943 for someone identifying as non-binary — a saving of $782.
EXCLUSIVE: Insurance companies are offering cheaper deals for non-binary customers.
We’ve tested the loophole ourselves.
MORE: https://t.co/orBbqnjxQh pic.twitter.com/OZfnrJbHej
— 2GB Sydney (@2GB873) November 30, 2025
The post, headlined “2GB PRODUCERS TEST NON-BINARY LOOPHOLE,” made clear that the only variable affecting the premium was the gender selection.
Monday’s segment closed with Fordham summarising the findings: “Insurers are charging male customers hundreds more. Non-binary customers get the cheapest rate. No data or explanation is provided. One insurer hides behind a document that doesn’t explain it. The other refuses to answer questions because it’s so sensitive. What in the world is going on?”
NRMA and Allianz Confirm ‘Non-Binary’ Discount
The Daily Declaration reached out to both NRMA and Allianz to confirm whether the cheaper premiums for ‘non-binary’ customers were intentional.
“NRMA Insurance recently introduced a non-binary option into the comprehensive car insurance quoting process to enable non-binary customers to be represented and recognised when applying for insurance,” an NRMA Insurance spokesperson confirmed, adding, “It’s important customers provide accurate information when purchasing insurance.”
“We will continue to refine our approach as we gain insight on driver behaviour to ensure policies and premiums are reflected appropriately,” she said.
The reply from Allianz was similar.
“At Allianz, we strive to be inclusive in our insurance offerings,” a spokesperson explained. “Due to the small percentage of non-binary individuals, limited data is available to assess risk accurately. Therefore, we currently default to the lower-priced gender option, which is typically, but not always, female.”
“Allianz will continue to refine our approach to policies and premiums to reflect updated information. We trust our customers to provide accurate information when applying for insurance.”
Both NRMA and Allianz place heavy emphasis on LGBTQI+ “inclusion” as part of their corporate identity.
According to NRMA’s website, the company’s SHINE network promotes “gender affirmation leave,” “all-gender bathrooms,” and policies designed to let staff “be their authentic selves,” framing these measures as essential to a “safe, welcoming environment.”
Allianz adopts similar language, describing its Pride network as committed to “furthering the awareness of LGBTQ+ issues” and positioning the company as an “employer of choice for LGBTQ+ applicants.”
Both NRMA and Allianz have achieved Gold Employer status on the Australian Workplace Equality Index (AWEI), a benchmarking program administered by the LGBT activist group ACON, which receives funding from both federal and state governments.
___
Image courtesy of Pexels.
13 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
14 July 2026
3.4 MINS
Riding a wave of viral success from high-profile debates, biblical scholar Wes Huff will teach a new eight-part course on the Historical Reliability of the Bible through Dr. Jordan Peterson's Academy. The course will cover topics from canon formation to archaeological data and the historical Jesus.
14 July 2026
3.9 MINS
The Greens are pushing an "anti-conversion practices" bill that goes further than anything we've seen in other states — and it should alarm every Australian Christian, parent, and, actually, everyone — not just Tasmanians. Please pray for Tasmania.
14 July 2026
3.7 MINS
Recent reporting — including statements from Israel’s new ambassador to Australia and a powerful press release from the Indigenous Friends of Israel — reveals a disturbing truth: antisemitism in Australia has surged. Australia is facing a moment of moral reckoning.
14 July 2026
7.3 MINS
Nation First looks into how the ABC and UN aid industry are exploiting child marriage to push a climate agenda, attract more taxpayer funding and shield the adults and customs responsible for child brides.
13 July 2026
5.6 MINS
Donald Trump has finally concluded that Iran's Islamist rulers cannot be reasoned with, exposing the harsh reality that some regimes are driven by ideology, not negotiation.
13 July 2026
3.3 MINS
Pastor Ezra Jin’s unexpected release from a Chinese prison reunites his family after years apart and renews hope for persecuted Christians still imprisoned under the CCP.
13 July 2026
7.1 MINS
This compelling analysis explores the decline of Australia's bravery honours, raising urgent questions about administrative failures, transparency and whether courageous Australians are receiving the recognition they deserve.






God have mercy on Australia
Okay families, it’s time to ditch the NRMA and Allianz companies. Vote with your wallet and see how committed they remain to that tiny segment of the market. A financial boycott is a powerful non-violent action every Christian can take to reverse this unGodly, unhealthy, UN-new world order trend. Great article, Kurt. Thank you!
I would suggest (tongue in cheek) that we all tick ‘non-binary’ and receive these monetary benefits, I bet things would change then.
Yes, Monica, time to ditch these companies.
Thankfully, my insurer in WA, RAC Insurance, only offers gender choice of male or female. I think if people were tempted to choose NB as a gender, and made a claim, the insurer might say you lied on your application, as you are not NB on other documents and refuse to pay anything. It sure is a silly game NRMA and Allianz are playing, but nothing is out of the realm of possibility in these bizarre end days
How does a non binary person prove their status when making a claim. If a doctor confirms they are a biological male will that make their insurance null and void?
Certainly worth looking at other insurers and making a change to make a point.
Probably cheaper if you shop around.
Agree with all the above comments. Ridiculous situation. Yes, need to boycott these insurers who offer cheaper to non- binary.
Lord forgive our nation
If non binary drivers are a safer group overall than cisgender drivers, why shouldn’t they have cheaper insurance?
My vehicle insurance is due on 21st December. Upon reading this post today (3/13/2025) I carried out the same test – all information identical with the exception of the gender identification box. The result was exactly the same amount quoted – $1548 for both Male and Non-Binary. Your thoughts?
Time to leave theses 2 company’s I will be boycotting both.
Madness! There is a desperate need for truth to be told and upheld: Reject and expose the lies. But with pity on those who believe and accept the lies and madness. WWJD? Jesus had compassion for those who seek to be healed. Could or can we convey Matthew 11:28-30? Show people the better way of truth and (true) love.