Drug Policy: Smoke Blown in Your Eyes
Following an Inquiry, the Drugs of Dependence (Personal Use) Amendment Bill 2021 is before the ACT Assembly and aims to amend the Drugs of Dependence Act 1989.
The Amendment Bill, put forward by ALP backbencher Michael Pettersson and supported by the Australian Greens, among other things, raises the personal possession limit of several illegal drugs:
- Amphetamine: 2 grams
- Cannabis, dried: 50 grams
- Cannabis, harvested: 150 grams
- Cocaine: 2 grams
- Heroin: 2 grams
- LSD: 0.002 grams
- Lysergic acid: 0.002 grams
- MDMA: 0.5 grams
- Methadone: 2 grams
- Psilocybin: 2 grams
The Drugs of Dependence Act 1989 carries penalties for possession, sale, supply of prohibited substances and drugs of dependence.
The proposed amendment aims to overturn the harm-prevention approach of the 1989 Act despite the Australian Federal Police and the ACT Police Association expressing concerns over an expected increase in drug use, criminal activity and drug trafficking as a result.
This is exactly what has happened in many other jurisdictions when possession was legalised, as shown in the official European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) and the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) statistics.
On the other hand, under John Howard, Australia implemented the Tough on Drugs policy in 1998, which outlined the possibility of a criminal conviction for any illicit drug use, possession, or trafficking. By 2007, drug use in Australia had decreased by 42 per cent and overdose deaths plummeted 68 per cent. Good drug policy works!
Terrible Cost
The Australian community gets it. They understand the issues around hard drugs as shown in the 2019 National Drug Strategy Household Survey of more than 22,000 Australians. It showed that 99 per cent of Australians do not approve of the use of heroin, speed and ice, 97 per cent the use of cocaine and 96 per cent of ecstasy. Put simply, this Amendment Bill does not pass the pub test!
The harm these drugs cause to social cohesion cannot be exaggerated. It’s the mums and dads that are carrying the emotional and financial burden of addicted loved ones. These families are too often the victims of crime – theft, violence. Rehabilitation is costly for families and quickly eats up hard-earned savings or superannuation.
The number of children who are living out of home has increased in the ACT since 2015 from over 600 to around 900, in many cases, this is the result of an addicted parent or guardian that leads to neglect of the children. Legalising possession of drugs is permission-giving for drug use, which easily leads to increasing drug use and rates of addiction.
Clash with Federal Law
How will ACT legislation stand in relation to Commonwealth law? Given that policing in the ACT is the responsibility of the Australian Federal Police, how will the police operate when the jurisdiction is under federal law?
The Commonwealth Criminal Code (part 9.1) creates a range of drug offences including possession. Will Commonwealth law override the ACT Bill, if it is passed?
At the time of the Inquiry, the Morrison Government responded to this proposed legislation by stating that Commonwealth laws, particularly section 308.1(1) of the Criminal Code, would still apply in the ACT and that it would be expected that the AFP would enforce the Commonwealth law in the ACT.
As Peter Cain, Liberal MLA for Ginninderra, points out in his nine-page Dissenting Report to the Inquiry:
“It is fundamental to the rule of law that a jurisdiction should not enact legislation that is inconsistent with the laws of a superior jurisdiction.
“Further, the police would have different obligations under ACT and Commonwealth law and preferring the ACT approach with respect to these extremely harmful substances would place them at risk. The Legislative Assembly cannot conscionably place this burden on the police.”
Consider the Consequences
The AFP has voiced strong opposition to the Bill. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Reece Kershaw said these laws will make for “a far more dangerous environment” for police and lead to “a more dangerous society”.
A spokesman for the Police Association said:
“The only people who will benefit from this exercise are organised criminals and drug dealers.”
AFPA president Alex Caruana said:
“The Government may as well write a cheque for organised crime and roll out the welcome mat.”
The Pharmacy Guild of Australia (ACT Branch) observed that:
“Decriminalisation of dangerous drugs may increase use and therefore increase the presentation of people at treatment centres and pharmacies, and increase the burden on the Territory’s resources.”
The Inquiry into these laws that was conducted by a Legislative Assembly committee itself admitted that drug-treatment services are already overstretched and inadequately resourced and staffed.
The fact remains that decriminalising hard drugs will increase drug supply and usage, increase crime, increase addiction, increase road trauma and stretch already overloaded treatment services.
This Bill certainly fails the pub test, so it should fail in the Parliament.
___
Originally published at News Weekly. Photo by Igor Mashkov.
Recent Articles:
24 August 2026
3.5 MINS
John Anderson joins Karl Stefanovic to unpack Australia's mounting challenges — from Cultural Marxism and youth values to Net Zero, farming pressures, defence gaps and Labor's economic mismanagement.
24 August 2026
7.6 MINS
A controversial UK government guide telling asylum seekers about sexual consent has sparked fierce criticism over immigration, public safety and government accountability.
24 August 2026
2.3 MINS
Live Action is fighting back against a cease-and-desist letter accusing it of defaming abortion advocates. Backed by the Thomas More Society, the pro-life group says it will keep calling abortion "killing."
21 August 2026
1.8 MINS
Archbishop Fisher accuses ABC of bias in voluntary assisted dying coverage, demands formal investigation into impartiality breaches over telehealth ban debate.
21 August 2026
2.9 MINS
An Australian-designed nuclear microreactor, built in just 150 days, has been sold to a US firm after federal and state bans blocked its development at home — the latest in a long line of missed Australian innovations.
21 August 2026
2.9 MINS
When five men are accused, "all men" bear the guilt — but when a woman errs, she's just an individual. This piece asks why identity logic only turns rigid on demand.
20 August 2026
4 MINS
Young Australians face a housing crisis decades in the making. This piece argues political choices—not fate—locked a generation out of the Australian Dream, and calls for national renewal.
