The Respect for Marriage Act Is Anti-Child
The Respect for Marriage Act currently before Congress would enforce not only the acceptance of same-sex unions, but also “marriages” with multiple partners. This would further erode the right of children to be raised by their mother and father in a stable, faithful long-term relationship.
“The essential public purpose of marriage is to connect mothers and fathers to their children and to one another,” said Ruth Institute President Dr Jennifer Roback Morse, PhD.
“All the stated purposes of the newly redefined concept of marriage are either private or inessential.”
“The Ruth Institute categorically opposes the cynically misnamed ‘Respect for Marriage Act’ (HR 8404). And we commend the more than 2,000 religious leaders who signed an open letter opposing this deceptive and dangerous same-sex marriage bill currently before Congress.”
Adult Predilections Before Children’s Rights
“Children need their parents,” Morse explained.
“All humans have a right to know the identity of the two people who brought them into life. And except for unavoidable tragedy, children have a right to be in relationship with both parents.”
“Removing a gender requirement for marriage undermines these basic human rights by redefining the social and legal understanding of parenthood. Redefining marriage was bad public policy in Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015, and it is bad public policy in HR 8404 today.”
Polygamy, Polyandry, and More
HR 8404 goes further than the 2015 ruling. Besides federal recognition of marriage between same-sex couples, it would require states to recognise any type of marriage, including of multiple partners.
“Thus, if a state decided to legalise polygamy, group marriage, marriage between blood relatives, or marriage between an adult and a minor, every other state and the federal government would be forced to recognise these unnatural unions,” Morse warned.
“The bill’s authors are postponing a Senate vote until after the election because they fear the political consequences. The Sexual Revolutionaries are playing to their radical base and hiding the radicalism of this bill from the people.”
More Legal Weaponisation
In their letter, the 2,000 religious leaders argued that the Respect for Marriage Act would, in effect, deputise anti-faith forces to sue individuals, churches, businesses and other organisations that refuse to bend a knee to newly created forms of “marriage.”
The Ruth Institute has consistently and resolutely opposed the redefinition of marriage. In part because of this, it has been on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s list of “hate groups” since 2013.
“After Obergefell, states began replacing ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ on marriage licenses with ‘spouse 1’ and ‘spouse 2,’” Morse noted. “The ‘Respect for Marriage Act’ would accelerate this trend by making marriage a free-form institution.”
“The radical redefinition of marriage is part of the movement to abolish marriage and the family,” Morse said. “Protecting these institutions, which are the bedrock of civilisation, is the most crucial issue of our time.”
___
Originally published at The Ruth Institute. Photo by Askar Abayev.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
16 September 2026
4.7 MINS
Sall Grover is leaving Australia, but not the fight. Following the High Court's refusal to hear her appeal in Giggle v. Tickle, Grover declared she will not call a man a woman — whatever the law says. She won't stop fighting until the law changes.
16 September 2026
3.8 MINS
Adelaide-based pop artist LILLI has been named Australian Emerging Artist of the Year at the 2026 People’s Choice Awards, capping a landmark year of chart success, her debut album Anthropology and songwriting work in Nashville. The South Australian Christian artist was one of three finalists represented by Adelaide independent label Australian Christian Records.
16 September 2026
6.7 MINS
When Dr Paul Tyson hand-delivered a letter opposing the Digital Duty of Care bill to his local MP's office, he expected a brief exchange. Instead, he left feeling patronised, unheard, and more alarmed than ever.
16 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Before it was ‘Dignity in Dying’, the euthanasia lobby was founded by a medical eugenicist who called the sick a “useless burden”. That dark history didn't disappear — it was just rebranded.
16 September 2026
2.2 MINS
Thirty-seven years after the Berlin Wall fell, socialism is gaining popularity among Americans with no memory of life behind the Iron Curtain. History, however, tells a very different story.
15 September 2026
5.1 MINS
Joshua Broome was a porn star with fame, money, and a drug overdose planned. Trapped in deep shame and guilt, he found forgiveness and his true identity in Jesus Christ, and is now a husband, father, author and pastor.
15 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Many Christians avoid J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series due to a perceived conflict between its themes and Biblical Christianity. Yet according to the author of a recent biography of J. K. Rowling, there is much more to the picture.
As these bill’s become law’s they remove our personal and social ability to protect our children. We leave children like food for wild beasts to tear apart and those who survive will by necessity identify with their perpetrators and consequently will go forth and multiply .
Martyn Iles recently said ” there comes a time when judgement is more merciful than patience.” May God have mercy on those who seek it …..
Thank you for your work Jennifer.