
Tell Me Christians, With Friends Like Dutton, Who Needs Enemies Like Andrews?
Liberal supporters disappointed that Scott Morrison wasn’t interested in fighting the Culture Wars will be dismayed to discover that Peter Dutton seems intent on fighting them, but for the other side.
The Opposition leader took time out from not opposing Net Zero madness to vilify orthodox Christian beliefs last week, describing Christian teaching on homosexuality and abortion as ‘an abomination’.
Dutton’s commentary on the Essendon Football Club’s decision to part ways with their CEO because of his links to the Anglican church began well enough.
He said the media and political pile-on that forced Andrew Thorburn from the job he held for just 24 hours was ‘an egregious attack’ on religious freedom.
Praise the Lord!
Total Fail
But then Dutton suddenly felt the urge to outdo Daniel Andrews in vilifying Christianity, no small feat.
It was like Dutton, having listened to Andrews deride Christianity as ‘absolutely appalling’, told the Victoria Premier: ‘Hold my beer…’
The Liberal leader, turned theologian, told Sky News Australia:
‘The views that have been expressed by a pastor at this church in relation to gay people, or to the issue of abortion — they’re an abomination and I condemn those points that have been made by that particular pastor.’
Tell me Christians, with good friends like Peter Dutton, who needs enemies like Daniel Andrews?
No one can ever accuse the Liberals of playing to their base. These days they spit on it.
I get that some Liberals — even the Liberal leader himself — might be pro-choice. But for the Liberal leader to declare it an ‘abomination’ to believe the mysterious thing detected by the ultrasound in the pregnant woman’s womb is a human being? I mean, it’s not a potato, Mr Dutton.
And I appreciate that some Liberals might want to join their inclusive, diversity-loving Labor colleagues at the front of the next Gay Pride Parade. By all means, Mr Dutton, wave that rainbow flag like your political future depends upon it.
But to condemn the Biblical view of sexuality as an ‘abomination’?
Harsh Language
If only the conservative leader spoke in such strong terms about the maddening obsession with destroying the economy in pursuit of Net Zero emissions.
If only he had condemned lockdowns and vaccine mandates as an abomination…
Sigh.
Instead, Mr Dutton saved his most virulent rhetoric since becoming Liberal leader to denounce Christian belief in the sanctity of life and the supremacy of the traditional family unit.
His choice of words was interesting. Christian views on sexuality were an ‘abomination’, Mr Dutton said, and he ‘condemned’ them.
As Dr David van Gend pointed out so brilliantly in this week’s Spectator Australia Magazine, it was the lawgiver Moses who declared about 3,000 years ago that sodomy was an ‘abomination’.
(Christians don’t use language like that anymore.)
And it was the saviour Jesus who, personifying both the law of God and the love of God perfectly all at the same time, told the woman caught in sexual sin that even though she had sinned He would not ‘condemn’ her.
True Tolerance
The essence of Christianity, then, is clarity around ideas while exercising charity toward people, and especially toward those with whom we disagree.
It is for this reason that Andrew Thorburn’s pastor can believe homosexuality is wrong while warmly welcoming homosexuals.
And it is for this reason that Andrew Thorburn can believe abortion is tantamount to murder (if indeed that is what he believes) while working graciously alongside women who have had abortions.
But can Christians argue for the sanctity of life and the supremacy of the traditional family unit while belonging to one of the two major parties?
Daniel Andrews reckons Christian views are ‘appalling’. Dutton reckons Christian views are an ‘abomination’.
With Labor and the Liberals appearing to be on a unity ticket when it comes to condemning timeless Christian beliefs, and with 11 million Australians still prepared to identify as appalling and abominable, there are a lot of voters looking for a spiritual home at the next election.
___
Originally published at The Spectator Australia.
Republished from The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
24 June 2026
4.8 MINS
After scoring the sixth-fastest goal in FIFA's 2026 World Cup, Christian footballer Felix Nmecha dropped to one knee and symbolically laid his crown at the feet of Christ. It's a gesture that captures everything about him: faith first, football second.
24 June 2026
2.9 MINS
If you’re a parent or a grandparent, you probably worry about what your child or grandchild is learning at school. In the first of its kind in Australia, a survey has been launched to measure parent attitudes to Respectful Relationship sessions in schools.
24 June 2026
5.9 MINS
Nation First looks into Keir Starmer’s resignation and why Anthony Albanese should be worried by the same policy failures now haunting Labor at home.
23 June 2026
4 MINS
Christian, captain and soccer legend Lionel “Leo” Messi is giving all the glory to God as he makes FIFA 2026 World Cup headlines. The Argentinian is widely respected for his integrity, humility and the way he carries himself on and off the pitch.
23 June 2026
3.2 MINS
The Australian Christian Freedom Index documented 74 Acts of Parliament that have restricted Christian freedom over the past 25 years. Which parties and worldviews restrict Christian freedoms in Australia — and why?
23 June 2026
3.4 MINS
I woke up on Sunday morning to discover that a Sydney boys school not only requires boys to be boys, but requires boys to remain as boys. What a time to be alive!
22 June 2026
2.7 MINS
Australia still has a blasphemy law architecture that goes by a new name — namely, our vilification and anti-discrimination framework. These laws have striking parallels to Australia’s old blasphemy laws, with the exception that they serve a new god and are more readily enforced than the old ones.






The UN 1948 “universal” declaration of human rights and its derivative conventions mandate that governments protect life before birth, as forensically demonstrated in “Human Rights and the Unborn Child” [Rita Joseph, 2009]. Prima facie, an overtly ‘religious’ position is not imperative for Mankind’s universal movement to progress the inherent dignity of every person.
Thanks James for saying so well what I believe to be true, but don’t have your gift of clear thinking and succinct journalism to say it myself.
Thanks James for saying so well what I believe to be true, but don’t have your gift of clear thinking and succinct journalism to say it myself.