
Tell Me Christians, With Friends Like Dutton, Who Needs Enemies Like Andrews?
Liberal supporters disappointed that Scott Morrison wasn’t interested in fighting the Culture Wars will be dismayed to discover that Peter Dutton seems intent on fighting them, but for the other side.
The Opposition leader took time out from not opposing Net Zero madness to vilify orthodox Christian beliefs last week, describing Christian teaching on homosexuality and abortion as ‘an abomination’.
Dutton’s commentary on the Essendon Football Club’s decision to part ways with their CEO because of his links to the Anglican church began well enough.
He said the media and political pile-on that forced Andrew Thorburn from the job he held for just 24 hours was ‘an egregious attack’ on religious freedom.
Praise the Lord!
Total Fail
But then Dutton suddenly felt the urge to outdo Daniel Andrews in vilifying Christianity, no small feat.
It was like Dutton, having listened to Andrews deride Christianity as ‘absolutely appalling’, told the Victoria Premier: ‘Hold my beer…’
The Liberal leader, turned theologian, told Sky News Australia:
‘The views that have been expressed by a pastor at this church in relation to gay people, or to the issue of abortion — they’re an abomination and I condemn those points that have been made by that particular pastor.’
Tell me Christians, with good friends like Peter Dutton, who needs enemies like Daniel Andrews?
No one can ever accuse the Liberals of playing to their base. These days they spit on it.
I get that some Liberals — even the Liberal leader himself — might be pro-choice. But for the Liberal leader to declare it an ‘abomination’ to believe the mysterious thing detected by the ultrasound in the pregnant woman’s womb is a human being? I mean, it’s not a potato, Mr Dutton.
And I appreciate that some Liberals might want to join their inclusive, diversity-loving Labor colleagues at the front of the next Gay Pride Parade. By all means, Mr Dutton, wave that rainbow flag like your political future depends upon it.
But to condemn the Biblical view of sexuality as an ‘abomination’?
Harsh Language
If only the conservative leader spoke in such strong terms about the maddening obsession with destroying the economy in pursuit of Net Zero emissions.
If only he had condemned lockdowns and vaccine mandates as an abomination…
Sigh.
Instead, Mr Dutton saved his most virulent rhetoric since becoming Liberal leader to denounce Christian belief in the sanctity of life and the supremacy of the traditional family unit.
His choice of words was interesting. Christian views on sexuality were an ‘abomination’, Mr Dutton said, and he ‘condemned’ them.
As Dr David van Gend pointed out so brilliantly in this week’s Spectator Australia Magazine, it was the lawgiver Moses who declared about 3,000 years ago that sodomy was an ‘abomination’.
(Christians don’t use language like that anymore.)
And it was the saviour Jesus who, personifying both the law of God and the love of God perfectly all at the same time, told the woman caught in sexual sin that even though she had sinned He would not ‘condemn’ her.
True Tolerance
The essence of Christianity, then, is clarity around ideas while exercising charity toward people, and especially toward those with whom we disagree.
It is for this reason that Andrew Thorburn’s pastor can believe homosexuality is wrong while warmly welcoming homosexuals.
And it is for this reason that Andrew Thorburn can believe abortion is tantamount to murder (if indeed that is what he believes) while working graciously alongside women who have had abortions.
But can Christians argue for the sanctity of life and the supremacy of the traditional family unit while belonging to one of the two major parties?
Daniel Andrews reckons Christian views are ‘appalling’. Dutton reckons Christian views are an ‘abomination’.
With Labor and the Liberals appearing to be on a unity ticket when it comes to condemning timeless Christian beliefs, and with 11 million Australians still prepared to identify as appalling and abominable, there are a lot of voters looking for a spiritual home at the next election.
___
Originally published at The Spectator Australia.
Republished from The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
5 August 2026
6.8 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
5 August 2026
5.2 MINS
Jesus’ words are not a suggestion, but a call to action for every believer. When we represent Jesus, when His life is formed in us and expressed through us, we become light in a world that still walks in darkness.
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.
5 August 2026
3.4 MINS
A new study finds people with multiple myeloma need more than medical treatment, urging doctors to address patients’ emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs alongside clinical care, in the face of impending death.
4 August 2026
5.2 MINS
How do you feel about listening to music that's been made totally through machine learning? Does it matter if you can't tell if it was made by a human or AI? Could the lyrics and emotion still resonate with you? Now, what about AI music made to worship God, or spread the Christian message — does it actually matter?
4 August 2026
5.3 MINS
Alan Ritchson’s faith is sincere yet complicated, blending robust defences of Christianity with controversial political remarks, candid reflections on mental health and an unwavering commitment to family.
4 August 2026
9.1 MINS
Thirty Muslims living in the West have made their intentions crystal clear. They've announced their plans to dominate your country, replace your values, and transform your way of life — all on camera, in their own words. They're not hiding their Islamic agenda. The question is: When will we start believing them?






The UN 1948 “universal” declaration of human rights and its derivative conventions mandate that governments protect life before birth, as forensically demonstrated in “Human Rights and the Unborn Child” [Rita Joseph, 2009]. Prima facie, an overtly ‘religious’ position is not imperative for Mankind’s universal movement to progress the inherent dignity of every person.
Thanks James for saying so well what I believe to be true, but don’t have your gift of clear thinking and succinct journalism to say it myself.
Thanks James for saying so well what I believe to be true, but don’t have your gift of clear thinking and succinct journalism to say it myself.