
Tell Me Christians, With Friends Like Dutton, Who Needs Enemies Like Andrews?
Liberal supporters disappointed that Scott Morrison wasn’t interested in fighting the Culture Wars will be dismayed to discover that Peter Dutton seems intent on fighting them, but for the other side.
The Opposition leader took time out from not opposing Net Zero madness to vilify orthodox Christian beliefs last week, describing Christian teaching on homosexuality and abortion as ‘an abomination’.
Dutton’s commentary on the Essendon Football Club’s decision to part ways with their CEO because of his links to the Anglican church began well enough.
He said the media and political pile-on that forced Andrew Thorburn from the job he held for just 24 hours was ‘an egregious attack’ on religious freedom.
Praise the Lord!
Total Fail
But then Dutton suddenly felt the urge to outdo Daniel Andrews in vilifying Christianity, no small feat.
It was like Dutton, having listened to Andrews deride Christianity as ‘absolutely appalling’, told the Victoria Premier: ‘Hold my beer…’
The Liberal leader, turned theologian, told Sky News Australia:
‘The views that have been expressed by a pastor at this church in relation to gay people, or to the issue of abortion — they’re an abomination and I condemn those points that have been made by that particular pastor.’
Tell me Christians, with good friends like Peter Dutton, who needs enemies like Daniel Andrews?
No one can ever accuse the Liberals of playing to their base. These days they spit on it.
I get that some Liberals — even the Liberal leader himself — might be pro-choice. But for the Liberal leader to declare it an ‘abomination’ to believe the mysterious thing detected by the ultrasound in the pregnant woman’s womb is a human being? I mean, it’s not a potato, Mr Dutton.
And I appreciate that some Liberals might want to join their inclusive, diversity-loving Labor colleagues at the front of the next Gay Pride Parade. By all means, Mr Dutton, wave that rainbow flag like your political future depends upon it.
But to condemn the Biblical view of sexuality as an ‘abomination’?
Harsh Language
If only the conservative leader spoke in such strong terms about the maddening obsession with destroying the economy in pursuit of Net Zero emissions.
If only he had condemned lockdowns and vaccine mandates as an abomination…
Sigh.
Instead, Mr Dutton saved his most virulent rhetoric since becoming Liberal leader to denounce Christian belief in the sanctity of life and the supremacy of the traditional family unit.
His choice of words was interesting. Christian views on sexuality were an ‘abomination’, Mr Dutton said, and he ‘condemned’ them.
As Dr David van Gend pointed out so brilliantly in this week’s Spectator Australia Magazine, it was the lawgiver Moses who declared about 3,000 years ago that sodomy was an ‘abomination’.
(Christians don’t use language like that anymore.)
And it was the saviour Jesus who, personifying both the law of God and the love of God perfectly all at the same time, told the woman caught in sexual sin that even though she had sinned He would not ‘condemn’ her.
True Tolerance
The essence of Christianity, then, is clarity around ideas while exercising charity toward people, and especially toward those with whom we disagree.
It is for this reason that Andrew Thorburn’s pastor can believe homosexuality is wrong while warmly welcoming homosexuals.
And it is for this reason that Andrew Thorburn can believe abortion is tantamount to murder (if indeed that is what he believes) while working graciously alongside women who have had abortions.
But can Christians argue for the sanctity of life and the supremacy of the traditional family unit while belonging to one of the two major parties?
Daniel Andrews reckons Christian views are ‘appalling’. Dutton reckons Christian views are an ‘abomination’.
With Labor and the Liberals appearing to be on a unity ticket when it comes to condemning timeless Christian beliefs, and with 11 million Australians still prepared to identify as appalling and abominable, there are a lot of voters looking for a spiritual home at the next election.
___
Originally published at The Spectator Australia.
Republished from The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo: Wikimedia Commons.
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
15 September 2026
5.1 MINS
Joshua Broome was a porn star with fame, money, and a drug overdose planned. Trapped in deep shame and guilt, he found forgiveness and his true identity in Jesus Christ, and is now a husband, father, author and pastor.
15 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Many Christians avoid J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series due to a perceived conflict between its themes and Biblical Christianity. Yet according to the author of a recent biography of J. K. Rowling, there is much more to the picture. Listen to our full conversation.
15 September 2026
1.7 MINS
The temptation to believe we have special knowledge others don’t is as old as Eden. But Christians must pursue what's true, and stop mistaking suspicion for wisdom and conspiracy for courage.
15 September 2026
13.3 MINS
Nation First analyses how Albanese’s Digital Duty of Care could expand the definition of online harm, pressure Big Tech to censor lawful speech and supercharge the powers of eSafety.
15 September 2026
4.8 MINS
"We've been lied to for a quarter century about Islam." So says a leading critic of Muslim political ideology on the 25th anniversary of 9/11 — and he argues that deception will cost America dearly.
14 September 2026
4.5 MINS
Moira Deeming says the public hasn't heard the full story of what happened to her inside the Victorian Liberal Party — and now, after joining Family First, she's ready to tell it.
14 September 2026
9.7 MINS
The word of God is living and active, and Christians across history have taken that seriously. A new Melbourne Bible Reading initiative is joining a global movement to read Scripture publicly — and you can be part of it.






The UN 1948 “universal” declaration of human rights and its derivative conventions mandate that governments protect life before birth, as forensically demonstrated in “Human Rights and the Unborn Child” [Rita Joseph, 2009]. Prima facie, an overtly ‘religious’ position is not imperative for Mankind’s universal movement to progress the inherent dignity of every person.
Thanks James for saying so well what I believe to be true, but don’t have your gift of clear thinking and succinct journalism to say it myself.
Thanks James for saying so well what I believe to be true, but don’t have your gift of clear thinking and succinct journalism to say it myself.