Cambridge Dictionary Goes Woke and Redefines ‘Woman’
Adding to what Orwell wrote in 1984: war is peace; freedom is slavery; Ignorance is strength — ‘man is woman’.
The authoritative dictionaries of the English-speaking world are scrambling over each other to stay woke.
In 2020, Merriam-Webster infamously updated its entry for female to include “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male”. Now the online edition of the Cambridge Dictionary has gone one better: in addition to being “an adult female human being”, a woman is now “an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth”.
Imposition
The new “trans-friendly” addition to Cambridge’s entry for woman was quietly added sometime in October, “after editors studied how the words were being used throughout society,” according to The Australian.
“How words were being used” by whom? Out-of-touch activists?
Let’s not pretend the top-down proselytising of trans ideology taking place across the West is some kind of natural social development. To the extent that people are using the word “woman” as Cambridge suggests, they are often doing so under extreme social coercion — or worse. Just ask Enoch Burke, the Irish school teacher who has been languishing in jail for refusing to use concocted pronouns in his own classroom earlier this year.
Illogical
The Cambridge Dictionary hasn’t just added a new definition for the word woman. They have undermined their original one, contradicting themselves and making a mockery of common sense.
The first and original definition it provided for the word woman — “an adult female human being” — excludes men, by definition. The second, trans-ified definition they have added — “an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth” — by definition includes men.
The second is definitionally the opposite of the first.
According to the Cambridge Dictionary, a woman is either an adult female human or not an adult female human. They have erased the boundary between a thing and its opposite, breaking the first rule of logic upon which every other rule of logic depends: A is not non-A. Erase that rule, and all that’s left is a nihilistic abyss.
Next, the Cambridge Dictionary will be telling us that war is war, but it is also peace; that freedom is freedom, but it is also slavery; that ignorance is ignorance, but it is also strength.
But there is still more nonsense to untangle.
Mealymouthed
To speak of an “adult who lives and identifies as female” is to admit the adult in question is not female — otherwise, this tortured phrase is redundant. Who needs to live and identify as something they already are?
Speaking of tortured phrases, “they may have been said to have a different sex at birth” — really?
Not “had a different sex at birth”. Not “may have had a different sex at birth”. Not “are said to have a different sex at birth”. But “may have been said to have a different sex at birth”. What an exhausting string of words! Obfuscation, not clarity, is the goal.
Someone needs to tell Cambridge that dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. They don’t get to define reality; they can merely attempt to reflect it. Oxford, Cambridge, Merriam-Webster, and other prestigious publishers can muddy the waters all they like, but their efforts will be like trying to crack an anvil with a hammer.
In the words of Winston Churchill, a master of the English language,
“Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it, ignorance may deride it, malice may distort it, but there it is.”
All else is sound and fury.
___
Originally published at MercatorNet. Photo by ArtHouse Studio.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
7 February 2025
3.4 MINS
Beyoncé, an R&B legend, was handed the Best Country Album for “Cowboy Carter” at the Grammy Awards on Sunday. John Rich – a Christian, clued-in culture critic, and Country Music veteran – questioned the legitimacy of the awards process.
7 February 2025
8.2 MINS
I was once very much a man of the left, but since becoming a Christian, I have moved to the right. But neither one deserves my complete allegiance. While much of conservatism I readily embrace, there are some aspects of it that I want little to do with.
7 February 2025
5.2 MINS
Trump has not only reversed misguided Biden-era policies related to life and family, but has also advanced socially conservative policies at a pace few anticipated. Given the breadth of action taken, it is worth summarising these recent developments.
6 February 2025
7.7 MINS
Even before the inauguration of Donald Trump occurred, it was evident that the zeitgeist of the Western world had shifted. But I don’t think anyone had predicted that change would occur so decisively and quickly.
5 February 2025
3.2 MINS
Calvin Robinson, a former GB News host, British priest, and podcaster, is being cancelled for using Elon Musk’s impassioned gesture at the annual national pro-life conference in the United States.
4 February 2025
2.4 MINS
Given that the popularity of castrating kids is now at historically low levels and that Republicans control both houses of Congress, it is highly likely Trump’s reforms will be written into law before the upcoming midterms.
4 February 2025
3.3 MINS
One might wistfully hope that the rise of a Trump or Milei to power would somehow spark far-reaching reforms that ultimately returned power to the people. But that does not seem at all likely, given that the path to political reform in both cases is not grassroots change but sweeping uses of executive power.
I know the Truth and The Truth has set me free …