The ‘Voice’ is a Great Idea… Apart from All the Reasons It Will Be a Disaster
Nine Reasons the Aboriginal Voice to Parliament is a Dud.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has promised a referendum next year to include an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the Australian Constitution.
His proposal is unnecessary, discriminatory, divisive, misleading, distracting, hurried, elitist, highly political and little more than a vanity project.
Aside from all of that, I don’t see any problem with it!
Superfluous
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is unnecessary because Aboriginal people already have a voice to parliament via their local MP — the same as every other Australian.
Further, we have 11 Aboriginal MPs in the federal parliament right now.
But most importantly, if the PM feels the need to consult Aboriginal people over certain government policies, there is absolutely no impediment to him doing so right now. He could pull together an Aboriginal consultancy group this afternoon if he chose.
Counterproductive
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is discriminatory because it differentiates between Australians based on their race. Australians get one chance to influence parliament, unless they are Aboriginal, in which case they get two. This is fundamentally wrong.
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is divisive since, by favouring certain people based on race, it separates us from one another and will create animosity.
The principle of one vote, one people, one voice is destroyed by Albo’s scheme. Some people, based on skin colour, are seen as a different people and get an extra voice.
Resentment at such inequitable treatment would be inevitable.
The Voice fosters ‘otherness’. ‘Otherness’ fosters division.
But it won’t only create division between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginals, it will create fighting between Aboriginals as they compete to see who gets to sit on the various local Voices and regional Voices that get to influence the Voice.
Undermining the Nation
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is misleading because it is being sold as “an act of generosity” and of “good manners”. No, it’s a profound change to the Constitution. The Constitution is a legal document detailing how the nation operates — it is not a Hallmark greeting card for expressing sloppy sentiment.
The government is not even trying to explain the constitutional detail to people. It is simply appealing to the public’s emotions and telling them, essentially, that they need to vote for constitutional change to demonstrate their virtue.
Their clear intent is to try to finesse the Voice through the referendum process, ignoring talk of details in order to concentrate on the ‘vibe’.
Rarely, in my lifetime, have I seen the public treated with such contempt.
Empty Virtue Signalling
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is distracting because it claims to be improving the lives of Aboriginal people while doing exactly nothing to improve the lives of Aboriginal people.
There are enormous problems facing Aborigines, particularly in remote communities. The Voice doesn’t do a single thing to address Aboriginal unemployment, poor educational outcomes, domestic violence, substance abuse or a myriad of other issues. The Voice does, however, distract everyone from those things.
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is hurried because most of the details regarding how it will operate have not even been finalised. In fact, the PM is now saying he wants Australians to vote in favour of the Voice and then let politicians decide how it will operate.
If you take the Constitution seriously, you take the time to get changes right via clear communication and lengthy consultation. The government is not even pretending to be interested in a thorough process.
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is elitist in that it has been conceived and designed by political activists and it will entrench a particular group of political activists in Canberra. If legislated, the Voice will be celebrated by political types, not by the people in remote communities it purports to represent.
Moreover, the local and regional voices are not elected, they are selected, entrenching political privilege for a few well-connected Aboriginal people.
Ablo’s ‘Voice’ is highly political in that it is designed to wedge opponents. The government is hiding details of the Voice, while telling people that if they don’t vote for the Voice, they are essentially unkind. The government has barely bothered to address the many concerns that have been raised about the proposal, preferring instead to wave them away with claims that anyone who expresses hesitation about supporting the Voice is likely a racist.
And finally, Ablo’s ‘Voice’ is a political vanity project. There is little question, in my mind, that the PM sees this as an opportunity to do something historic for which he will be remembered long after his promised but ultimately ill-fated $275 cut to power bills has been forgotten.
Kevin Rudd famously said “Sorry” to Aborigines. Albo will be famous for legislating the ‘Voice’ for Aborigines. The Voice is Albo’s ‘Gough’ moment, designed to enshrine his place in history.
Other than all of that, it’s a good idea.
___
Originally published at The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Photo: Fernando Calvo Rollán/Wikimedia Commons
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
16 September 2026
4.7 MINS
Sall Grover is leaving Australia, but not the fight. Following the High Court's refusal to hear her appeal in Giggle v. Tickle, Grover declared she will not call a man a woman — whatever the law says. She won't stop fighting until the law changes.
16 September 2026
3.8 MINS
Adelaide-based pop artist LILLI has been named Australian Emerging Artist of the Year at the 2026 People’s Choice Awards, capping a landmark year of chart success, her debut album Anthropology and songwriting work in Nashville. The South Australian Christian artist was one of three finalists represented by Adelaide independent label Australian Christian Records.
16 September 2026
6.7 MINS
When Dr Paul Tyson hand-delivered a letter opposing the Digital Duty of Care bill to his local MP's office, he expected a brief exchange. Instead, he left feeling patronised, unheard, and more alarmed than ever.
15 September 2026
13.4 MINS
Nation First analyses how Albanese’s Digital Duty of Care could expand the definition of online harm, pressure Big Tech to censor lawful speech and supercharge the powers of eSafety.
15 September 2026
4.8 MINS
"We've been lied to for a quarter century about Islam." So says a leading critic of Muslim political ideology on the 25th anniversary of 9/11 — and he argues that deception will cost America dearly.
14 September 2026
4.5 MINS
Moira Deeming says the public hasn't heard the full story of what happened to her inside the Victorian Liberal Party — and now, after joining Family First, she's ready to tell it.
14 September 2026
9.7 MINS
The word of God is living and active, and Christians across history have taken that seriously. A new Melbourne Bible Reading initiative is joining a global movement to read Scripture publicly — and you can be part of it.
Don’t forget the very important solution of euthanasia which has been pushed and passed throughout our Nation James. Another ‘ kindness ‘ to the suffering of the aged, the disabled and the disadvantaged.
Of your 9 strong reasons for Albo’s act of no-sense, I think this one is the most important and destructive….
Albo’s ‘Voice’ is misleading …..it’s a profound change to the Constitution. The Constitution is a legal document detailing how the nation operates — it is not a Hallmark greeting card for expressing sloppy sentiment.
Thanks James.
Not to mention that there’s already a “voice” – the National Idigenous Australians Agency (https://www.niaa.gov.au/) – which is funded to the tune of $4 billion per year!
The constitutional amendment proposed by Albo will be a disaster for the country and make no difference to indigenous people (except for the activist class who’ll jump aboard this gravy train).
Vote NO!