
10 Reasons Why I Oppose the Indigenous (Activist) Voice to Parliament
1. It’s premised on the lie that Indigenous Australians have no voice to our parliaments. Our state and federal governments all have Indigenous affairs ministers that regularly liaise with many Indigenous organisations. Don’t accept the lie. The first thing you say when someone asks if you support the voice is: “Of course, and Indigenous Australians have had direct voices to our parliaments for years.”
2. It’s racist. It assumes that all Indigenous Australians agree on everything and therefore their will can be expressed in a single voice. We’d never say that about other races.
3. There is not a shred of evidence or even argument to show that it will make any practical difference to Indigenous employment, health, educational, substance abuse, or domestic violence outcomes.
4. It’s a boondoggle — a pointless exercise designed for professional activists and academics who have little idea of how to address practical problems to be able to point to something and say: “This is what we’re doing.” As Ralph Wiggum would say: “I’m helping!”
5. We really don’t know how it will work in practice, and people pointing to 750 pages of details without being able to summarise its workings in a few sentences is no help and shows that those 750 pages don’t tell us much about its operation.
6. Discussion of the Voice has often led to a discussion of a separate and sovereign Indigenous nation in Australia — a Treaty. Indeed, this Voice is seen by many of its engineers as another step closer to two Australias. Two Australias will in reality be non-Indigenous Australians perpetually funding a failed Indigenous state.
7. The so-called Voice will eventually turn into a perpetual call for a Treaty, a Treaty that Australians will never allow, which means the Voice will eventually merely stoke cynicism and resentment among younger Indigenous Australians. It will make social divisions and integration worse, not better.
8. The Uluru Statement from the Heart disgracefully tells Indigenous Australians that they are powerless over their own lives and destinies unless there is this Voice. What a horrible thing to say to a whole generation of Aboriginal Australians. The Statement is thoughtless, lying, and destructive.
9. The Voice and Statement further entrench the idea of two separate and opposed nations, which will dissuade Indigenous Australians from integrating into mainstream Australian “colonist” (“white”) culture. But the only way the Gap will ever be closed is through more integration.
10. We are never told what the Voice will say that has not already been said. If there is nothing new for it to say, why do we need it? If its advocates believe it will say something new and of practical benefit, why not just say it now?
___
Originally published on Facebook. Photo: Nick-D, NAIDOC Week 2016/Wikimedia Commons
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
13 October 2026
2.6 MINS
Allegra Spender’s proposed bill reignites debate over discrimination protections, religious freedom and the right of faith-based schools to uphold their beliefs and values.
13 October 2026
3.9 MINS
Tasmania’s proposed conversion practices law raises serious concerns for churches, parents and faith-based schools, with broad definitions, severe penalties and uncertain protections for religious freedom.
13 October 2026
2.1 MINS
Victoria’s assisted dying deaths have surged by 300 per cent since legalisation, while a disturbing case involving a patient’s partner raises urgent questions about safeguards.
13 October 2026
1.8 MINS
Australia faces mounting geopolitical, economic and defence threats, but its political leaders lack the statesmanship, bold vision and decisive communication needed to prepare the nation.
13 October 2026
2.8 MINS
The church in Ephesus had so much going for it. Yet despite their hard work, perseverance, endurance, and discernment, there was something deeply wrong: they had left their first love.
12 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Learn how journalists use loaded language, selective quotes and misleading headlines to shape public opinion, using a controversial report about James and Joanna Howe as a case study.
12 October 2026
3.1 MINS
The proposed livestream of Nidal Hasan’s execution has reignited debate over justice, deterrence and public accountability, with critics comparing American justice to ISIS propaganda.






The pleasure of listening to the voice of those who are able and willing to articulate why, they agree or disagree! The alternative to such a voice is frustrated incoherence and tyranny.
Education is not an idle pastime it is an opportunity to learn how to say how to do …….just about anything.
Thank you Stephen.
Well said Kaylene.
Again Stephen you provide clear and concise evaluation on this matter.
Not unusual for you!
Thanks brother.