
NSW Bill to Punish ‘Conversion Therapy’ with 10 Years Imprisonment
So-called conversion therapy is set to be outlawed in NSW, with those found guilty facing up to 10 years in prison if a new bill passes.
Australia’s most populous state, New South Wales, is set to become the fourth jurisdiction in the country to ban so-called ‘conversion therapy’. If successful, the law will punish those helping gender-confused youth with up to 10 years imprisonment.
The ‘Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill 2023’ was tabled in the NSW lower house last Thursday by activist-politician Alex Greenwich. Greenwich is an independent and openly gay MP, and was one of the key leaders of the Yes campaign for same-sex marriage in 2017.
Similar bills banning help for people with unwanted sexual attraction became law in Queensland, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria in 2020.
When the 2017 same-sex marriage debate took place, Mr Greenwich readily dismissed the No campaign’s concerns about the future of free speech and freedom of religion as “red herrings”.
🚨 NSW Conversion Practices Bill 2023 released yesterday:
👉 10 YEARS IMPRISONMENT for those who do not affirm another's "gender identity" resulting in "serious injury"
👉 "Serious injury" defined as injury that is "substantial" or "protracted" (i.e. anything)
👉 Consent is…
— Chris Baxter (@chrisbaxter41) August 25, 2023
Should We Also Ban Cruelty to Unicorns?
Following the precedent set in other states, Mr Greenwich’s bill insinuates a blatant falsehood — namely, that harmful “conversion practices” are in use in Australia.
As Mercator editor Michael Cook wrote last week in response to the tabling of the bill:
Loose talk about “conversion practices” conjures up electric shocks, nausea-inducing drugs, exorcisms, ice baths, aversion therapy and so on. There is no evidence of such practices having occurred in Australia for decades. A bill banning them is like a bill banning cruelty to unicorns. It might come in handy if [a unicorn] were discovered in a forgotten valley in the Blue Mountains. But since animal abuse is already covered under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, even then there would be no need for fresh legislation.
The legislation would strengthen an LGBT conveyer belt jurisprudence, whereby social institutions are unrestrained from grooming young people into the rainbow gender cult, while all attempts in the opposite direction are outlawed.
The Illiberal Provisions of the Bill
The provisions in Mr Greenwich’s bill should be of grave concern to all Australians.
The bill attempts to entrench in law a tenet of woke secularism that most people of faith — and many people with no religious faith — would reject outright. It seeks to “affirm that a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity is not broken and in need of fixing”.
If passed, the law would impose a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 10 years for anyone found to “intentionally engage in change or suppression practices that negligently cause serious injury to an individual”. “Serious injury” is defined as anything that is “substantial and protracted” — allowing almost any words or actions to be interpreted as incriminating behaviour.
Even if a person has sought help and engages in the so-called “conversion therapy” as an enthusiastic participant, the person accused of helping them can still be convicted. “It is not a defence,” the bill explains, “that the individual consented to the change or suppression practice”.
Additionally, if a parent or other concerned adult tries to circumvent the NSW law by taking the gender-confused person to another state to receive help, they face “imprisonment for 2 years”.
Contact Your Local Member
Mr Greenwich’s Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill 2023 is as illiberal as it is misguided. As noted by Michael Cook:
Mr Greenwich has based most of his inflammatory assertions on research from Latrobe University, notably a 2018 report called “Preventing Harm, Promoting Justice: Responding to LGBT conversion therapy in Australia”. Its claims were based on first-person narratives from 15 people. It’s impossible to know how reliable these witnesses were.
Mercator has provided a comprehensive fact check calling out the falsehoods in Mr Greenwich’s bill here.
Residents of NSW are encouraged to contact their local member and express their thoughts on the proposed legislation.
Image via Unsplash.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
24 August 2026
3.5 MINS
John Anderson joins Karl Stefanovic to unpack Australia's mounting challenges — from Cultural Marxism and youth values to Net Zero, farming pressures, defence gaps and Labor's economic mismanagement.
24 August 2026
1.9 MINS
Five Sydney Swans players face serious allegations after a hotel party scandal. But watch how quickly "five players" became "all men" — without a shred of extra evidence.
24 August 2026
7.6 MINS
A controversial UK government guide telling asylum seekers about sexual consent has sparked fierce criticism over immigration, public safety and government accountability.
24 August 2026
2.3 MINS
Live Action is fighting back against a cease-and-desist letter accusing it of defaming abortion advocates. Backed by the Thomas More Society, the pro-life group says it will keep calling abortion "killing."
24 August 2026
3.5 MINS
A recap of the Grandparenthood podcast chat on the impact of dads, and a preview of the 2026 Men's Summit at Stanwell Tops, highlighting the National Grandparent Conference happening the same weekend.
21 August 2026
3.8 MINS
On Monday, more than 10,000 baby booties were laid in the shape of a cross on the lawns of Parliament House in Canberra, all pointing towards the chamber where that same morning, Nationals MP Llew O’Brien introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026.
21 August 2026
2.9 MINS
Ardie Savea and Siya Kolisi, rival captains united in faith, worshipped together ahead of Rugby's Greatest Rivalry — revealing how Christ grounds each of them on and off the field.






Kurt, succinct, and practical. I particularly loved:
‘Loose talk about “conversion practices” conjures up electric shocks, nausea-inducing drugs, exorcisms, ice baths, aversion therapy and so on. There is no evidence of such practices having occurred in Australia for decades. A bill banning them is like a bill banning cruelty to unicorns. It might come in handy if [a unicorn] were discovered in a forgotten valley in the Blue Mountains. But since animal abuse is already covered under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, even then there would be no need for fresh legislation’
Thnak you for keeping to the pulse of the woke agenda. It amazes me that Labor’s government is being directed by an independent! Apparently Labor have no ideas of their own worth fighting for!
Well said Jim but what we should be ( a long time ago were) able to is have a “…fair suck of the sav”.
The ‘educators’ who overload littlies with gender confusing material should also be answerable for their actions. Fat chance of that the LBWetc+ have worked for years to white ant society with their ‘reality’ and little by little circumvented our societal values whilst we sat back and watched decency slip slide away.