
Our Judeo-Christian Heritage Under Threat: Educators Hosting Secularism Conference
The NSW Teachers Federation (NSWTF) and the Australian Education Union (AEU) are at it again, spending members’ funds on political left-wing ideology rather than what it is meant to be doing, which is furthering the education standards, welfare, and professional development of teachers.
Both the NSWTF and the AEU are saying, unbelievably, that they are “proudly” hosting the first Secularism Australia Conference on Saturday 2nd December 2023. They also vaguely claim they are supported by pro-secular Australian organisations which have joined together to sponsor what they call a ‘long overdue’ conference.
What is disturbing is that they claim that the conference will feature ‘high-profile speakers and secular champions’ who’ve been working hard for many years to ‘reclaim’ Australia as a genuinely secular nation. Really?
At the conference, we are told that we will hear from inspirational pro-secular speakers as they share their visions for secularism in Australia. Among the line-up of speakers sharing their so-called vision for a truly secular Australia appear to be predominantly left-wing activists. In addition, we are told we will meet the ‘secular champions’ who are pushing for reform. What reform and why?
Disturbingly, the Conference will discuss topics including the history of secularism in Australia, the need for secularism in our country, and the threats to secularism that we face today.
But the true underlying reason for this ideologically driven conference is, as the conference states, to make education a key focus of the conference, with topics including Special Religious Education (SRE), the National Chaplaincy program, and government funding to religious schools.
Without Christian and Independent schools – who educate nearly half of 4,042,512 students enrolled in 9,614 schools in 2022 – the education system would collapse.
Missing Links
It seems blatantly obvious that both the NSWTF and the AEU need to go back to school and study some Australian history. They believe the conference will be a key step in the creation of a ‘unified national voice’ articulating a vision for a future Australia that establishes a balance between freedom of religion, and freedom from religion.
The Australian Constitution, which became law on 9 July 1900, clearly highlights under Section 116 that:
The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth.
It must also be recognised that according to experts at that time, it is very unlikely that the Federation of States would have been approved if the preamble or opening words of the Constitution had not included a reference to Almighty God, as pointed out in a constitutional convention debate by Mr Lyne, who was one of the delegates from New South Wales. Even the editorial of the Sydney Morning Herald on 14 April 1897 stated:
… no Christian could in conscience vote for a Federation Bill that did not recognise God.
The preamble to the Constitution was adopted unanimously. At that stage, Sir John Downer, together with Edmund Barton and Richard O’Connor, were responsible for drafting the Australian Constitution during the 1897-98 Convention in Adelaide, remarked:
… the Commonwealth will be from its first stage a Christian Commonwealth …
So, if the Secularism Australia Conference wants to ‘reclaim’ Australia as a genuinely secular nation, then are they suggesting that the preamble to the Constitution be changed? Are they wanting another referendum?
A Christian Nation
Let us make it perfectly clear that the preamble of the Australian Constitution states that the people of the six self-governing colonies agree to federate into a Commonwealth while ‘humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.’ When the Constitution was being drafted, several religious groups and denominations had advocated for the recognition of God in the Constitution. In essence, the preamble exemplifies the nation’s religious, and specifically Christian, heritage, and the Judeo-Christian values strongly embedded in the community.
Whether the NSWTF and AEU like it or not, legally, Australia is not a secular society but a Christian nation. Christianity is indeed under attack here in Australia and globally. In a paper released last month, the Canadian Human Rights Commission cited Christianity’s two biggest holy days as examples of “present-day systemic religious discrimination” because they are statutory holidays in Canada.
Are we going to have to say ‘goodbye’ to the Easter hat parade, the family Christmas tree, or Christmas day? To my recollection, there has been no objection from other religions, such as the Jews or Buddhists, et cetera, to the observance of events on the Christian calendar.
The Secularism Australia Conference is nothing more than an attack on Western Civilisation, with the main aim of further destabilising Australia’s political, social, educational, and Christian foundations.
The Australian Constitution invokes divine blessing and binds those who hold public office to the performance of their official duties through a mandatory oath or affirmation. The oath of office thus suggests that law and religion may be as intertwined as they are separated in today’s politics.
Our Judeo-Christian values have helped shape the nation of Australia, and this legacy should be acknowledged by people who wish to become citizens. Moreover, our Judeo-Christian values have been an integral part of the nation’s remarkably successful system of government and society, and Australians should not be ashamed of it.
We need to seriously question the motives of the NSWTF and the AEU as to why they want to change Australia’s value system through their ideologically driven conference.
Finally, we need to appeal to the Australian people and our governments to protect and preserve who and what we are as a nation. Non ducor, duco.
___
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio.
6 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
6 August 2026
2.4 MINS
One Nation has built its appeal on personality rather than policy detail. A recent pitch from Pauline Hanson covered immigration, child care and Net Zero — but will she deliver on it?
6 August 2026
3.3 MINS
Facing closure, St Mary's church congregation has refused to surrender. The 900-year-old medieval building's dedicated parish has secured a crucial heritage grant to begin its long-overdue restoration.
6 August 2026
2.2 MINS
Transgender actress Elliot Page has sparked debate by citing chimpanzee behaviour to justify gender ideology. We’ve lost God, and now our spiritual collapse means we’re taking moral cues from monkeys. What could possibly go wrong?
6 August 2026
5.3 MINS
Boy George's new song "We Will Dance Again" challenges the anti-Israel narrative dominating cultural discourse. The British pop icon has risked his career to stand for Israel and Jewish people — but the backlash has been swift and severe.
5 August 2026
6.9 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
5 August 2026
5.2 MINS
Jesus’ words are not a suggestion, but a call to action for every believer. When we represent Jesus, when His life is formed in us and expressed through us, we become light in a world that still walks in darkness.
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.






Greg, thank you for your calm clear call for freedom of conscience and religion. The most telling idea I think is that half of our children are educated in Christian or Independent Schools where parents have a vital role and teachers are happy to be ‘in loco parentis’.
Hi Greg
I appreciate your wariness toward a push to secularism. I think too many followers of Jesus are misled into believing that the public sphere’s of life are best kept neutral, when they never are…someone’s faith or worldview always calls the tune for morals, values, rights or wrongs etc…
I am however not convinced the word “Judeo-Christian” is an apt description of what is fundamental about Western civilization & the freedoms & cultural blessings we enjoy. I think conflating Jewish faith with Christianity misrepresents both. To refer to a “Biblical worldview,” “Jewish belief,” or to “Christian faith & practice,” seems better reflect what is foundational to Australia and the Christian West.
Thanks again
Pax vobiscum
Please provide a link to where the AEU make a statement on this conference. They are not involved. Do you fact-check your articles?
Please see the link where the joint logos of the NSWTF and AEU are used for this conference.
file:///C:/Users/info/OneDrive/Desktop/Secularism-Australia-Conference-Info-Registration-Form.pdf
Thanks Greg, I think you meant https://www.nswtf.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Secularism-Australia-Conference-Info-Registration-Form.pdf
Thanks – I don’t know why the AEU logo is on that form, as they were not involved beyond whatever intrinsic ties they have the with NSWTF (I did some volunteering for the event). I can understand you not liking secularism, given that it helps ensure actual religious freedom and equality, and you have no interest in that. As Martyn Iles once said, “not all religions are equal”. Its about dominionism, not a level playing field.