Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

One Nation has built its appeal on personality rather than policy detail. A recent pitch from Pauline Hanson covered immigration, child care and Net Zero — but will she deliver on it?

Pauline Hanson has spent the past 30 years being the political equivalent of a smoke alarm.

She’s been exceptionally good at detecting that the house is on fire. Less impressive, maybe, when asked whether she has a blueprint for rebuilding the kitchen.

The One Nation leader has sounded the alarm on immigration, housing pressure, political correctness, government waste and a sense that the people running the country are increasingly disconnected from the people living in it.

The problem has never been finding out what Pauline Hanson thinks is wrong. She’s not been shy about that.

The problem has been finding out what she would actually do about things, if she was ever given the keys to the joint.

Personality, Not Policy Detail

Politics isn’t just the art of pointing at the flames. Eventually someone — to borrow a phrase from Scott Morrison — has to hold a hose.

And point that hose in the right direction.

And then provide a blueprint for restoration.

One Nation’s appeal has been built around the personality of its leader rather than around the detail of its policies.

Many Australians know they like Pauline Hanson.

They like that she speaks bluntly. And they like that, unlike Coalition leaders, she doesn’t need to consult a focus group, three media advisers and a diversity expert before speaking because she’s worried about accidentally offending a houseplant.

Supporters see in Pauline Hanson someone finally saying what they are thinking.

But ask those same supporters what Hanson’s plan is, beyond identifying problems, and the answer becomes considerably less certain.

From Complaint To Proposal

Therein lies the challenge for One Nation.

As the Bible says… man does not live on frustration alone. Or something like that.

My point is that anger might get attention, and Hanson certainly now has that.

But governing requires a plan.

Eventually voters need to know not just who understands their concerns, but who has the practical ideas to address them.

That’s why Hanson’s hour-long question and answer session on Wednesday with my News24 colleague Paul Murray was significant.

Hanson began the essential move from opposition to proposal — from explaining why the house is on fire to outlining which rooms she intends to renovate.

She used the live audience Q&A to sketch out what the first 100 days of a One Nation government might look like.

And it didn’t look too bad.

Hanson’s First 100 Days

Within three months of winning power she would begin the process of cutting immigration, overhauling the NDIS, scrapping Net Zero policies and climate change departments, addressing the high cost of child care, taking better care of the elderly and challenging some of the cultural stupidity that’s become embedded in our public institutions. Welcome to Country… I’m looking at you.

Not every idea will convince every voter. Not every proposal will survive the brutal test of implementation. That’s true of every political platform.

But credit where credit is due: her 100-day agenda was a step in the right direction.

The easiest job in politics is pointing out what’s broken.

The harder job is explaining how you fix it without creating three new problems in the process — usually followed by the creation of a government taskforce to investigate why the first solution failed.

For years Pauline Hanson has been the person standing outside the building yelling that there is smoke coming from the windows.

Now she is finally starting to tell Australians where she thinks the fire hose is.

___

Republished with thanks to The James Macpherson Report. Image courtesy of One Nation.