Skewed Birth Ratio Study Sparks Fresh Calls to Ban Sex-Selective Abortion in NSW
Compelling new research has revealed a skewed male-to-female birth ratio among migrant groups, prompting NSW politicians and pro-life advocates to push for a ban on sex-selective abortion.
Pro-life advocates have welcomed a move to ban sex-selective abortion in New South Wales, following explosive new research indicating the practice is already used in the country to preference boys.
New South Wales Libertarian MP John Ruddick, who supported a failed amendment to ban the practice during the state’s recent abortion reform debate, plans to introduce a bill, likely in October, aimed specifically at banning sex-selective abortion.
Ruddick told The Catholic Weekly he was bolstered by an Edith Cowan University study revealing a disproportionate number of male over female births among certain migrant populations in New South Wales and Western Australia during the period 1994–2015.
The study published in Global Public Health journal in May was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council.
While the typical sex ratio at birth (SRB) in most parts of the world is approximately 105 boys per 100 girls, the researchers — led by perinatal epidemiologist Amanuel Gebremedin — found children born to Indian, Chinese and Vietnamese migrants had a ratio skewed towards boys that exceeded the expected ratio.
They said it was indirect evidence of sex-selective abortion practices.
“The increasing availability of non-invasive prenatal testing, which can determine fetal sex as early as 10 weeks, has raised some ethical concerns regarding its potential misuse for sex-selective abortion,” the researchers noted.
“Indian and Chinese mothers had much higher induced abortion rates in early pregnancy than their Australian counterparts, which coincided with the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing.
“This study provides the most compelling observational evidence to date of male-biased SRB among overseas-born mothers, which appears to be attributed to prenatal sex determination followed by selective abortion of females.”
While the findings should be interpreted with “caution”, researchers said the overall trend of male-biased SRB “remains consistent and aligns with existing literature on sex ratio imbalances among immigrant groups, particularly from countries with a strong son preference.”
Sex-Selective Abortion Debate Reignited
“The Greens said our amendment was not necessary because it’s not happening, then we saw that Edith Cowan research,” John Ruddick said.
“The evidence is absolutely bullet-proof that this is happening.”
“So I am hopeful we can actually get this bill through and it will be the beginning of reversing the tide against radical abortion laws we currently have in New South Wales,” he added.
“It’s an appalling problem and I think if this law gets up, the problem will cease.”
“The majority of Chinese and Indian parents in this country are obviously not engaging in this. Some are, and this law would help shape their understanding about what is acceptable in Australia,” Ruddick noted.
Monica Doumit, Director of Public Affairs and Engagement for the Archdiocese of Sydney, hopes the bill receives broad support.
“It would be absolutely shocking if any politician was in favour of killing a child in the womb simply because it was a baby girl,” she said.
“Surely our MPs can’t be so committed to the ideology of abortion on demand that they would block an attempt to prevent sex-selective abortion.”
Chief Executive Officer of Women’s Forum Australia Rachael Wong said it was not the first time Australians have been presented with evidence that sex selective abortions are being undertaken in the country.
“Still nothing is being done to guard against this abhorrent practice, which we know disproportionately impacts little girls in son-preference cultures, not to mention their mothers who often face coercion to abort their daughters,” she said.
“In fact, ‘abortion law reform’ allowing abortion on request, means that sex selective abortion is effectively and shamefully legal around Australia. In this regard, it is particularly appalling that NSW politicians have previously voted down protections against sex selective abortion,” Wong added.
“A reluctance to address this issue seems to stem from a desire to not want to threaten the so-called ‘right to abortion’ as well as a concern about appearing ‘racist’, neither of which are legitimate justifications for ignoring this insidious sex-based violence and discrimination being waged against our girls before they are even born.”
The Hidden Toll of Sex-Selective Abortion
South Australia-based pro-life advocate Joanna Howe said she would like to see a national ban on the practice but was “excited” to hear Ruddick intended to prepare draft legislation for New South Wales.
“We already have a ban on sex-selective abortion in South Australia and now we have definitive proof it happens in our country. We need urgent action to address the problem,” she told The Catholic Weekly.
Howe said it is known “without a doubt that baby girls are being killed just because of their gender.”
“What’s been remarkable is the deafening silence from pro-abortion politicians, the abortion industry and the media,” she said in a statement on social media.
“They claim to be pro-women, they say we love abortion because they are pro-women, but it’s clear that they love abortion more than they love women and girls.”
In 2021, following the decriminalisation of abortion in New South Wales, Reverend Fred Nile was unsuccessful in introducing a bill aimed to ban sex-selective abortion in order to protect unborn girls.
___
Republished with thanks to The Catholic Weekly. Originally titled “Pro-life advocates welcome move to ban sex-selective abortions in NSW”. Image courtesy of Unsplash.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
19 June 2026
3.5 MINS
One Nation’s “Fire the liar” rebuttal to Labor’s “fight the far-right” fundraiser has gone primetime. The clever return to sender was aired at least twice during Wednesday’s State of Origin game.
19 June 2026
3.7 MINS
Hon Maryka Groenewald asked the Cook Government to commit to protecting Christians’ right to express their faith freely. The Attorney General’s office dodged the question, instead pledging “balance” for WA’s “diverse” population.
19 June 2026
4.3 MINS
A rape gang report has revealed that at least 250,000 white British girls were subjected to repeated rape, trafficking, torture, and forced Islamic conversion by networks of predominantly Pakistani Muslim men. Around 87% of those convicted bore distinctively Muslim names.
19 June 2026
7 MINS
Nation First reports on Pauline Hanson’s National Press Club showdown and how the media, GetUp and the Liberals all helped prove her point.
19 June 2026
6.4 MINS
The FBI has uncovered a terrorist group of 19 individuals planning a terror attack on the White House on 14 June. But the FBI only learned of the threat because a family in Ohio became concerned about their son’s behaviour and alerted authorities.
19 June 2026
6.5 MINS
The West was repulsed by the Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi Regime against the Jews in WWII. Yet, it can find itself aligning with an underlying anti-Semitism that can be traced back to an error in an understanding Scripture first made by early Church leaders.
18 June 2026
3.6 MINS
History was made last night. Last night showed that the pro-life movement is capable not merely of resisting change, but of advancing its own positive vision for the protection of human life.
Yes, it is so that both Chinese (who were only allowed one child per family) often abandoned baby girl children, and boys are considered more important than girls ; (when I lived in China -1995-2006 -they were already short of females to marry) ; and that Moslem fathers want their first child to be a boy, and so demand that a girl child be aborted. In earlier times in China, parents often didn’t name their girls – called only by number e.g. 1st , 2nd etc daughter – and if they grew to be beauties would sell them to a nobleman as concubine
It’s understandble how the CCP’s one child policy in China resulted in sex selective abortions there, but how the heck is it justified here?
How about we ban all abortions and encourage people to have families, rather than telling people to focus on their own career track for satisfaction and happiness.