
A Refuge of Lies
It’s a shock but not a surprise, if you get my drift. The Anglican Church in the United Kingdom has elected a new archbishop. The result has been a global division.
That the new archbishop is a woman is a cause for debate. Considerable ink will be spent on that. More serious is what she stands for on social issues—gender and sexuality, and abortion.
These, in turn, demonstrate what is unimportant to the hierarchy of the church. The sacredness of life. The sacredness of human biology as God created it. The sacredness of marriage as God intended it…
Of course, neither Sarah Mullally nor anyone else needs to be compelled to believe what God has said about these things, nor that He has spoken. She is a free agent. But that the institutional church chooses to ignore the significance of the issues she chooses to champion is reprehensible.
A Sobering Episode
Have you read Jeremiah chapter 44? It is a sobering episode in the history of God’s people.
You are probably aware that the book of Jeremiah is a rollercoaster of sin, judgement and grace, of darkness and of hope. Chapter 44 deals with the group of Judeans who fled the looming captivity in Babylon, choosing to make Egypt their safe haven.
God had already said that if people fled to Egypt, they would not escape the judgement He was bringing upon Judah. It was only by submitting to God’s discipline and serving the king of Babylon that they would escape with their lives.
But what God said was not a factor in framing their opinions and actions. They went to Egypt anyway.
The Judeans sheltering in Egypt totally misconstrued their situation. They were worshipping the ‘queen of heaven’ (probably Ishtar or Astarte), and things were going well. Safety, prosperity, and especially social acceptance. Egypt had welcomed them.
When confronted by Jeremiah, they pointed this out. Yahweh had brought invasion and death to Judah. Their new Egyptian god was a much better bet. So, no, they would not stop worshipping their new god or reduce their allegiance to Yahweh alone.
Truth is Not a Tradable Commodity
As in Jeremiah’s day, oppression and persecution can be averted by blending in, by adopting the culture gods of the society in which we find ourselves. The new archbishop has ticked the most important boxes: gender, same-sex marriage and abortion. With these, she’ll get a seat at the top table whereas to stick with the out-of-step ways of Yahweh will reduce her, and the church she steers, to being social pariahs.
And she’s not alone. One of the public voices of the Uniting Church here in Australia has said,
“It is accepted that everyone can have a faith or no faith, and there is nothing inherently wrong with any way of living… it is just a part of life and an expression of all of us doing, or being, ourselves.”
Seemingly, it doesn’t matter what you believe, or whether you believe anything at all, and it doesn’t matter what lifestyle you choose, which would include any expressions of sexuality; it is just a matter of being yourself. In this way, we blend in. We offend no one. We find safety and acceptance.
The gods of our land are various expressions of relativism. Whatever you choose to believe, and whatever lifestyle or activities emanate from that belief, are valid. Your truth. Your lifestyle.
That includes Islam. It is “a faith”. Even the Anglicans’ king is now head of all faiths, not just “the faith once for all delivered to the saints.”
Of course, Muslims see it very differently. What naïve syncretism sees as just one more truth, Islam sees as a life-or-death reality.
What About the Little Ones?
Don’t get me wrong. The institutional church is not my great interest. My interest is in those who are being deceived by the ascendant fashion of clerical compromise. I recall Jesus said something about millstones when speaking of those who lead His little ones astray. What was it He said?
When the leaders of the people of God take refuge in blended ideologies, the persecution may stop, for a while at least. If they are not in opposition to anyone, what can possibly go wrong?
It is to misconstrue the situation in exactly the same way as the people of Judah did when they found safety and acceptance in their new compromised faith in Egypt. But God spoke, telling them that Egypt itself would soon be struck down, and they would die along with it. And it was.
The Attraction of Truth
In a recent devotional, Kurt Mahlburg wrote,
“Leaning into cultural hot topics doesn’t need to be a barrier – it can actually be a platform for the Gospel. When the Church speaks boldly, listens to the questions of our age, and answers with biblical clarity, hearts respond.”
Yes indeed! To speak boldly, listen and answer. To engage and respond to society with uncompromised truth.
For us, the lesson of Jeremiah 44 is to read the situation correctly and to recognise the utterly precarious nature of pursuing safety and acceptance through syncretism. In my opinion, the Anglican church in the UK and its new champion, Sarah Mullally, will discover this at their peril.
Our refuge is in Christ and Christ alone. If the world turns against us, let it be for the sake of Christ. If the world accepts us, let it be because they accept Him.
___
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
5 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
4 June 2026
2.7 MINS
Last Thursday, we witnessed something truly remarkable. The Australian Christian Freedom Index (ACFI) launch at Parliament House exceeded even our highest hopes — and God's generosity was unmistakable.
4 June 2026
5.3 MINS
The murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak has reignited debate over policing, race, multiculturalism, and DEI policies, following allegations that officers prioritized racism claims over a dying victim.
4 June 2026
5.2 MINS
A major new report warns that Christian freedoms in Australia are under increasing pressure, documenting legal restrictions, personal testimonies, and growing concerns about religious liberty.
4 June 2026
11.2 MINS
A major science publisher says the peer-reviewed article on the link between vaccines and SIDS is too dangerous for doctors and parents to read.
4 June 2026
4.2 MINS
The Henry Nowak case exposes declining trust in British policing. Ideological influences risk undermining impartial justice, public confidence, and equal treatment under the law.
4 June 2026
2.1 MINS
The harassment of Helen Mirren in London highlights rising antisemitism, political intimidation, and the distortion of public statements in an increasingly hostile debate over Israel.
3 June 2026
3.3 MINS
A New Zealand gang leader's radical conversion is turning hardened criminals toward Christ — and his own violent past is exactly what makes him the right man for the job.






Thanks so much Ray, a valuable analysis. Bless you !
Only needed the first four sentences in this article. 1 Timothy 2:8
I meant 1 Tim 2:12. Why complicate the matter?
Thanks so much for your comment Barry. It is my practise not to comment on comments, but I’d like to add a brief few words.
I left the archbishop-gender issue alone in my article because, in my opinion, a focus on that issue obscures the far deeper problem.
By way of background, some would see leadership gender issue as being of genuine, biblically respectful debate. For example, Greek scholars are aware that in the verse you pointed to in1 Timothy, the words “woman” and “man” in Greek are also used to mean “husband” and “wife”. When Paul tells husbands to love their wives, for example, those are the words he uses.
Within that Timothy passage, we might see Adam and Eve and childbearing as marriage related. So, there might be two honest opinions.
I am not in any way arguing the case for or against a female leadership, just suggesting that within that discussion lies the possibility of withdrawal into opinion.
The other issues are in a very different category. Murdering unwanted unborn children, murdering bothersome elderly people, declaring that God’s creation of male and female is an anachronistic social construct, abusing children by immersing them in gender and trans ideology before they even understand what sexuality is, these things will be far more destructive than the gender of the Archbishop. They are moral absolutes embedded in the very fabric of God’s character irrespective of the gender of the person championing them. Let’s not let society use leadership gender to goad us into the public airing of what might be considered internal debates when, far more urgently, lives old young are being brutalised by institutionalised moral disintegration. Church leaders, male or female, must irrevocably shun the idols of our modernity.
Thanks Ray, a well written article. As a retired Uniting Church minister’s wife I was truly sadden by the “public voices” quote from the Uniting Church. An opinion that now dominate this denomination. If it is possible I would like to find where you obtained the quote. Many thanks for speaking truth and standing firm. God’s richest blessings.