There is a new religion in town, and it’s called Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). You may or may not have heard of the title, but if you live anywhere in the Western world then you have felt its effects. It is the underlying financial rationale behind various government stimulus packages and the like. And because it basically involves “money for nothing,” it’s something that is only growing in popularity.
In case you don’t know what I’m referring to, the ABC has produced the following promotional video featuring Alan Kohler here:
I used to regularly look forward to watching Kohler’s financial report on the ABC news each evening. But when the global financial crisis hit, I suddenly realised that even he didn’t know what was going on. Fast forward to 2020 and I’m having that strange sense of déjà vu — all over again — as I watch him spruik the benefits of Modern Monetary Theory.
But it was the great far-left-turned-conservative, Padraic P. McGuinness, who best outlined the dangers of adopting this kind of macroeconomic approach in a speech for the H.R. Nicholls Society, which was appropriately titled: In Search of the Magic Pudding. McGuinness presciently observed:
“One of the things you discover in folk literature and children’s literature (and of course they were originally the same) is that something for nothing always has traps. Norman Lindsay’s The Magic Pudding was written in the middle of the First World War, though actually published in 1918; when I went back to read it again for the first time since my own childhood, it came back to me in an extremely fresh and interesting way.
Rod Cavalier, who is a former Labor minister for education in the NSW government, knows a lot about Lindsay, and was in fact married at one time to a member of the Lindsay family. The book certainly turned out a magic pudding for them, since they are still enjoying apparently inexhaustible royalties from it. I asked him whether there was reference in the book to a contemporary political controversy, since one of the interesting things about nursery rhymes and similar apparently innocent folk stories is that often they originate in political or social conflict.
But although he cannot recall any such context for Lindsay’s book, I see it as a political commentary on many Australian attitudes and institutions. The Magic Pudding, you will remember, was a pudding which could be steak and kidney pudding, or it could be a plum duff, or an apple dumpling — you just had to turn the dish around and whistle twice and it changed to whatever you wanted. It was absolutely unlimited in supply, and the pudding enjoyed being eaten and in fact pleaded to be eaten.”
McGuinness’ speech is worth re-reading in full. Not just for its economic, literary and political insights, but also for its humour. Just take, for instance, this comedy gem:
“The story of the Magic Pudding is one of the great stories of the hazards of having something for nothing… But this tradition of magic abundance needs to be contrasted with another tradition in economics one of the many reasons it is known as the dismal science… It is summed up in one phrase: There Ain’t No Such Thing As a Free Lunch (TANSTAAFL)… Surprisingly the notion of a free lunch is basic to economics — it might be called the science of free lunches.”
In all seriousness though, McGuiness argued that Modern Monetary Theory taps into a larger “universal theme” going all the way back to the Bible. In particular, the widow’s jar of oil that the LORD miraculously re-fills during one particular famine (i.e. 2 Kings 4:1-7). In fact, McGuinness stated,
“John Maynard Keynes uses the story of the widow’s cruse in his Treatise on Money to illustrate the notion that profits are endlessly replenished by increases in money demand.”
Now, as someone who has studied theology — but not necessarily economics — even I can see the problem financially here. And that is, the government is not God! The whole point of that particular incident in Holy Scripture is to demonstrate that there is a divine power with infinite resources upon whom people should look, rather than trusting in the work of their hands. What Keynes does, however, is turn the whole thing upon its head. As McGuiness — who was ironically a life-long atheist — explains:
“In Keynesian economics, the magic pudding is the notion that there is a kind of cost-free process of economic expansion. So, government deficits became the magic pudding. In Reagan-style supply side economics there is a similar magic pudding notion, that tax cuts could magically generate more than the output and revenue increase needed to finance them. Like the widow’s cruse, there is always a trap in the attempt to utilise these notions.
Essentially, the problem is one of magical thinking. But magic puddings are treacherous beasts, and the old principle in approaching confidence tricksters should be applied. If someone offers you something which is too good to be true, then it is not true. Distrust governments bearing neat and easy solutions, and distrust simple and comprehensive solutions to complex problems, whether they be labour market deregulation or easily reaped increases in product which appear to be cost-free.”
While not primarily concerned with economic theories, the Bible does present a more robust and integrated worldview than MMT. In particular, it places a high value on the importance of work (see 2 Thessalonians 3:6-15), as well as being prudent with one’s spending (Luke 16:10-12). It also wisely warns about the danger of wealth quickly received (Proverbs 20:21) and instructs that money is best accumulated little by little (Proverbs 13:11). How different this is to the fiscal largesse of MMT.
My parents instilled in me the self-evident truth that “money doesn’t grow on trees”, but according to folks like Kohler, that’s not actually the case. As long as one understands there is a direct equivalent between “trees” and The Reserve Bank printing presses. Although, to be fair, since Australian currency is now made out of polymer, not paper, that is no longer the case either.
We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.
Fake news and big-tech censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate today.
Activists within the pro-LGBT Methodist Church claimed Edwards’ words “distressed” co-workers. They accused the father of five of engaging in behaviour that “was extremely damaging”, arguing that he was also potentially hurting the organisation’s “business plan”.
This is not a tit-for-tat war, in which one side’s casualties justify or validate an equal number of deaths on the other side. On Israel’s side, this is a war for security and survival, while for Hamas, it is a war to eliminate Israel.
Israel can commit particular acts that are immoral, without becoming morally equivalent to Hamas, in the same way that Western Allies could commit morally problematic acts (e.g. Dresden), without becoming morally equivalent to the Nazis.
After 2000 years of virulent holy hatred, Judeophobia, genocide, expulsions, blood libels, ghettoisation, rejection, ridicule and demonisation, the world has not been able to cast off the shackles of innate antisemitism.