Ruth Institute Calls Out Kellogg’s for GLAAD Support
“Kellogg’s isn’t endorsing ‘pride,’ but a radical agenda that targets children and families,” said Ruth Institute President Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D.
The breakfast food company is working with the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) to promote its new purple-boxed “Together with Pride” cereal, which will hit supermarket shelves in June, just in time for pride month.
“Not only are they pushing the LGBTQ agenda,” said Morse, “they’re directly subsidising it.” For every $4 box sold of the rainbow-colored cereal, GLAAD get $3.
“Supposedly, GLAAD exists to counter defamation. In reality, it lobbies relentlessly for its agenda. Its Commentator Accountability Project targets journalists, guests and pundits who disseminate unpopular, albeit accurate, information about subjects GLAAD has declared off-limits for discussion,” Morse explained.
“For example, if a commentator observes that you can’t change your sex through surgery or drugs, that the sex you were born with will be the sex you die with — which is scientifically sound — GLAAD will call you ‘anti-trans.’ If someone on a talk show observes that children need both a mother and a father, they’ll be labeled ‘hateful.’”
Morse charged:
“It’s not just Kellogg’s. An array of corporate giants — including Delta Airlines, Wells Fargo, Netflix, Google and Target contribute to GLAAD’s coffers.”
As if direct subsidies weren’t enough, the side of each box of “Together with Pride” urges kids to choose their own pronouns, with options like he/him, she/her, and they/them–the “non-binary” option. There are even blank spaces for children to make up their own. What fun!
“These companies are virtue-signalling to the cultural elite and everyone who buys in to its agenda,” Morse said. “They’re saying ‘We’re nice guys. We love everyone. Buy our product.’
“But to support the LGBTQ agenda is not to love children, families or churches — all of which are ground zero in the culture war,” Morse declared. “Apologies to Tony the Tiger, but grrrreat! it’s not.”
The Ruth Institute is a global non-profit organisation, leading an international interfaith coalition to defend the family and build a civilisation of love.
The Institute’s 2021 Summit, “Reclaiming the Professions for Life and Family” will take place July 16-17 in Lake Charles, LA, USA.
[Photo by Sten Ritterfeld on Unsplash]Recent Articles:
10 December 2024
12.6 MINS
We need to go back almost 20 years to the time when the inaugural Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued the first dramatic arrest warrant for a sitting head of state. Will it prove a case of three strikes and you are out with respect to global governance?
10 December 2024
3.8 MINS
Regrettably and importantly, the assisted dying bill gives no direction as to what the doctor should do if the “lethal” dose does not, in fact, kill the patient. This will certainly happen and it needs to be specified if the bill is to become law.
9 December 2024
4.3 MINS
My stand is against the treatment of Israel by the Australian government and the United Nations. The Australian government would rather reward the terrorism of October 7 and has continually pushed for a two-state solution, when all the terrorists want is a one-state solution.
9 December 2024
6.7 MINS
What is the difference between 9 November 1938 in Germany and 6 December 2024 in Melbourne? Nothing, except some 86 years. In both cases, Jewish synagogues were set alight. The truth is, Jewish people no longer feel safe in this country.
6 December 2024
6 MINS
Australians are already feeling the cost of the 'renewable' transition, but there are far higher costs to come, according to Chris Uhlmann's new documentary 'The Real Cost of Net Zero'.
6 December 2024
1.4 MINS
It is a retrograde step by the Australian government to support a United Nations (UN) motion that effectively requires Israel to withdraw from so-called “occupied territories”.
6 December 2024
3.2 MINS
The last report from the United States oversight committee into COVID-19 is damning. Issued on 2 December, the select committee’s two-year investigation summary condemned lockdowns, social distancing, as well as mask and vaccine mandates as unscientific.