Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

With Daniel Craig retiring, the producer of the OO7 franchise has hinted that the next instalment could include a non-binary James Bond. The public would boycott it, argues James Macpherson, and Bond would no longer be Bond.

The progressive left’s crusade to normalise pathology shows no sign of slowing down, with calls for the next James Bond to be non-binary.

The idea is ridiculous, of course, since James Bond is fiction while non-binary is fantasy. They are different genres and should not be mixed.

Nevertheless, movie producer Barbara Broccoli – who with her half-brother controls the Bond franchise – told the Girls on Film podcast last week that a non-Binary 007 could not be ruled out.

“Who knows?” Broccoli said in response to the suggestion that the world’s most famous macho-womaniser could change his pronouns to ‘they/them’, now that Daniel Craig has retired from the role.

“I mean, I think it’s open. We just have to find the right actor,” she said.

Some Inspiration For a Transgender Bond Plot

If true, then the smart money is on either Pee-Wee Herman or RuPaul playing the next James Bond.

The movie’s plot will likely revolve around Bond – who has changed his codename from 007 to ‘LGB’ – giving his archenemy a ride to a non-denominational deradicalisation therapy session.

All hell breaks loose when Bond’s Tesla runs out of charge at a toilet stop because Bond takes so long deciding which bathroom to use.

In all the confusion, Bond’s nemesis addresses him with the wrong pronoun, leading to an emotionally charged climax in which our hero – clutching a comfort animal and speaking directly to the camera – explains gender theory.

This would be the first Bond movie in which the audience was rooting for the villain!

The Public Hates Woke Reboots

If Hollywood does decide to neuter Ian Fleming’s famous spy, it will be yet another misreading of a public that has repeatedly shown they will boycott any popular franchise that suddenly becomes weird.

Remember the reboot of Ghostbusters with an all-female cast? No? Nor does anyone else. It made a $70m loss.

Terminator: Dark Fate was woked into a feminist action movie that no one cared for. Same with Charles Angels.

The addition of transgender Jedis didn’t improve Star Wars. And a gay wedding didn’t save Star Trek Discovery, which was forgotten quicker than Jussie Smollett could say “Subway”.

Woke Hollywood is a minority trying to cater to a minority in an industry that relies upon the masses.

And yet, undeterred, the woke continue to insist that everything must be bent to suit their nihilist worldview, no matter the cost.

To Remake Bond is to Destroy Him

Bereft of any creativity, they infest every institution – whether the church, the media, the education system, or the arts – and hollow it out from the inside until there is nothing left.

It is only a matter of time before woke Hollywood executives scratch their heads wondering why my teenage sons aren’t rushing to cinemas to see Fast and Furious cast with hybrid midsize Prius sedans.

James Bond has always been a straight, white male. That he is a ladies’ man is part of his appeal.

To go all non-binary on James Bond would not be about re-imagining the character so much as destroying him, which appears to be the progressive left’s real agenda.

One thing is for sure. The reaction to a non-binary 007 would itself be non-binary. No one would love it. And no one would hate it. We’d all simply ignore it. 

Perhaps the movie’s title should be James Bomb – since that’s what it would do at the box office.