China’s One-Child Policy: Bad for Women
The myopic one-child policy of the Chinese Communist Party has created demographic and societal chaos. Women are particularly affected, for generations.
In this episode of the Ruth Institute Podcast, we tune in to Sacred Heart Radio’s show, Driving Home the Faith with Fr Rob Jack. Dr Jennifer Roback Morse discusses China’s one-child policy and the bleak demographic winter that looms in the future.
Dr Morse relates that perhaps it is absolute power wielded by a few which has corrupted the government of China.
“They get off on bossing people around and we have to account for that in the human condition, that some governmental policies are driven by corrupt persons who want to exercise their might.” [paraphrase]
The age-old maxim comes to mind: absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Divided Nation
Dr Morse adds that China fell for the overpopulation myth, hook, line, and sinker, with its own citizens turning on each other and reporting on non-conforming neighbours.
China assembled somewhere around one million persons into the birth-control police, conveniently named “Family Planning Police”. This was the largest, non-military police force in the world at the time. [1980s]
Dashed Hopes, Lack of Protest
Many economists and businesses thought that opening trade with China would make them want to be free like us. Capitalism was the great hope for them. But instead of liberalising because we dealt with them, they stole all our technology.
Dr Morse emphatically stated:
“The government has no right issuing birth limits on the citizen.”
She comments that very few Western, non-religious, NGOs (non-governmental organisations) said anything against the one-child policy when it was implemented. It seemed only religious people, mostly Catholic, would acknowledge that it is intrinsically wrong for the government to decide family sizes.
About-turn
Now China is encouraging women to have children. They are beginning to see what looks to be a devastating future.
The future looks especially bleak for the women of China, who are outnumbered significantly by their male counterparts. This is because the overwhelming demand under the policy was for sons.
“[China’s One Child Policy] increased the demand for women; it did not in fact increase the well being of women — it increased the well-being of men who control the women.”
– Dr Jennifer Roback Morse
___
Originally published at The Ruth Institute. Photo by Kindel Media from Pexels.
Recent Articles:
16 September 2026
4.7 MINS
Sall Grover is leaving Australia, but not the fight. Following the High Court's refusal to hear her appeal in Giggle v. Tickle, Grover declared she will not call a man a woman — whatever the law says. She won't stop fighting until the law changes.
16 September 2026
6.7 MINS
When Dr Paul Tyson hand-delivered a letter opposing the Digital Duty of Care bill to his local MP's office, he expected a brief exchange. Instead, he left feeling patronised, unheard, and more alarmed than ever.
16 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Before it was ‘Dignity in Dying’, the euthanasia lobby was founded by a medical eugenicist who called the sick a “useless burden”. That dark history didn't disappear — it was just rebranded.
16 September 2026
2.2 MINS
Thirty-seven years after the Berlin Wall fell, socialism is gaining popularity among Americans with no memory of life behind the Iron Curtain. History, however, tells a very different story.
15 September 2026
5.1 MINS
Joshua Broome was a porn star with fame, money, and a drug overdose planned. Trapped in deep shame and guilt, he found forgiveness and his true identity in Jesus Christ, and is now a husband, father, author and pastor.
15 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Many Christians avoid J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series due to a perceived conflict between its themes and Biblical Christianity. Yet according to the author of a recent biography of J. K. Rowling, there is much more to the picture.
15 September 2026
13.4 MINS
Nation First analyses how Albanese’s Digital Duty of Care could expand the definition of online harm, pressure Big Tech to censor lawful speech and supercharge the powers of eSafety.
