Winning Gambit: Taiwan Deserves a Fair Go on the International Stage

27 September 2022


The Republic of China, Taiwan, has been left out in the cold for far too long. It is high time that it is accepted back into the United Nations as a contributing member of the international community.

The intended role of the United Nations is to replace international anarchy with the rule of law.

English philosopher Thomas Hobbes, describing the “state of nature”, wrote:

“Life in the state of nature is solitary, poor, nasty, brutal and short.”

In his masterwork Leviathan, Hobbes proposed that citizens surrender some of their liberty in exchange for stable government. The purpose of the United Nations was to replace the law of nature with a permanent organisation that would maintain international peace and stability.

The United Nations (UN) Charter was signed by its 50 founding member states in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. At that same conference the International Court of Justice, intended to settle international legal disputes through a transparent legal process, was also established.

Among the UN’s founding members was the Republic of China (ROC). The government of the ROC was almost universally recognised as the government of all China. The ROC became one of the five Permanent Members of the UN Security Council, with the power of veto.


The intention of the UN’s founders was that membership of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) should be open to all states, large and small, and that the law of the jungle in international relations should be replaced by the rule of law.

This rules-based international system has special merit for small and middle-ranking powers, such as Australia, which rely on a stable international trading regime.

The ROC, or “Taiwan”, was thus a founding member of the United Nations and occupied the “China seat” on the UN Security Council.

As an ally of the United States and a member of the Western alliance, the ROC was a valued ally in the Korean War and during the war in Vietnam. General Douglas MacArthur was a close friend of Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek; and while the ROC did not commit ground troops in Korea, the ROC’s support was invaluable, as was later the case in Vietnam.

We should not overlook the ROC’s role at that time as a diplomatically valuable developing democracy, in particular on account of the ROC’s membership of the UN Security Council, with the invaluable power of veto.


As things developed, the ROC government was defeated militarily by the Chinese communists and went into exile across the Taiwan Strait in Taiwan. In 1949, the Communist Party of China declared itself the government of China, effectively usurping the role of the ROC.

Thereafter, the issue of who represented “China” at the UN could not be long suppressed. UNGA Resolution 2758 determined the “China Question” some 50 years ago in favour of the communist People’s Republic of China (PRC).

This Resolution did not state, however, that Taiwan was part of China, contrary to the repeated assertions of the PRC since then. Contrary to the PRC’s false claims, Resolution 2758 does not take a position on Taiwan, nor does it include the word “Taiwan”.

The long-term status quo is that the ROC (Taiwan) and PRC (Beijing) are separate jurisdictions; neither is subordinate to the other. The free citizens of Taiwan can be represented only by their freely elected government; the world’s only freely elected Chinese government.

The wrongful interpretation of UNGA Resolution 2758 has unjustly deprived Taiwan of the right to belong to the UN and its specialised agencies. And, despite Taiwan’s strenuous efforts to gain admission, it continues to be denied membership of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), among other UN agencies, because the communist PRC always vetoes its petitions to join.

Taiwan’s exclusion from the UN and its agencies, in the face of Beijing’s intransigent opposition, does not mean that Taiwan has not been active on the international scene.

Since the onset of the covid pandemic, Taiwan has provided medical supplies, including its home-grown vaccine, to allies around the world. It has sent more than 550 tonnes of relief supplies to the people of Ukraine since the Russian invasion, and has donated more than $50 million to help alleviate the suffering of Ukrainian refugees.

Taiwan is today, moreover, a key link in the global high-tech supply chain. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC), for example, is the world’s leading manufacturer of advanced semiconductors, also called computer chips.

Taiwan has a lot to offer. It is about time it was treated with justice in the organisation that was established to overcome the law of the jungle and protect the rule of law internationally.


Originally published at News Weekly. Photo by Timo Volz.

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.

One Comment

  1. Kaylene Emery 27 September 2022 at 3:48 pm - Reply

    Thank you so much for taking the time to publish this. It’s wonderful to learn n understand even when that understanding is painful.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life



The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.