Commission’s Report Ignores Faith’s Contribution to Society
The recommendations of the Australian Law Reform Commission relating to faith-based education must be rejected because, if implemented, they would undermine the freedom of parents to choose such an education for their children and the freedom of religious groups to offer them that option.
It is deeply troubling that the Commission would ignore this long-cherished tradition in Australia, our duties under international law, and its own terms of reference that required it to make recommendations that would ensure that faith-based schools could continue to be a particular community of faith.
It is confounding, also, that the final report of the ALRC proposes even greater restrictions on religious schools than were proposed in its widely-criticised interim report. Despite a veneer of consultation, the Commission completely ignored the concerns raised by religious schools and communities.
The recommendations of the ALRC give no weight to the benefit that Catholic and other faith-based schooling has been to millions of Australian families for more than 200 years.
Offering low-fee education to all comers and often no-fee education to the most needy, church schools not only ensured parent choice but were often the only provider around.
Australia’s first saint, Mary Mackillop, and her Josephite sisters, set the tone by focusing above all on the needs of poor, indigenous, migrant and remote kids. But all that counts for naught with the ideologues.
False Characterisation
It is a depressing feature of this nation’s recurrent discussions of religious freedom that they are framed as one group fighting for “the right to discriminate” and the other group fighting for equality.
It’s as if religious providers are only in the education game in order to promote hate. The reality is that church schools here and all over the world provide for children of all sorts — spiritually, academically, sexually and in every other respect — and they demonstrate great reverence for each child and a desire to do their best by them. In fact, they are radically inclusive, and this is a key reason why parents seek them out.
Every day, millions of Australians engage with Catholic health, education, welfare and parish services, and there they find welcome and pastoral care. The same institutions provide employment to hundreds of thousands of people of all faiths, and none and from a range of personal situations, and the overwhelming majority find their employers to be sensitive to their individual needs.
Religious providers are only asking for the freedom to keep offering their services from within their own spiritual tradition. People then vote with their feet. When the law protects religious freedom, faith communities use it to serve those around them, especially the most needy, and to bolster our society by filling gaps in government and free market provision.
Today, that freedom – to gather, speak freely, pray together and undertake works of service for others is being reduced slice by slice. People are sacked for social media posts that go against the cultural grain or for being part of a church that expresses traditional Christian beliefs.
An archbishop is dragged before a tribunal for teaching the Christian view of marriage. A Church hospital is forcibly acquired by the ACT government, apparently because of its ethics. Hospital funding is constantly threatened by those who would make it contingent upon abortion provision, and church-based aged care facilities are dragooned into hosting euthanasia.
Unwelcome
Ideologues seek to force radical curricula and policies on all schools in the area of sexuality and gender. The Productivity Commission has recently expressed a view that no religious activity can truly be seen as charitable — even though the Church is by far the oldest and largest provider of education, healthcare and welfare in the world. It is proposed that there be tax disincentives for those who contribute to school building funds. The list goes on…
The ALRC report is deeply flawed, but reflects a trend to talk down the contributions made by believers and their institutions to our social capital and to narrow their opportunities to serve.
Our political leaders must reject the report not only because of the damage it would do to faith-based schools, but also because of the signal it sends about people of faith and their activities not being welcome in our community.
I call on our political leaders of all parties to come together to protect our religious freedoms, not just for the sake of believers, but for the wider society whom they serve.
___
Republished from The Catholic Weekly. This op-ed first appeared in The Australian on 25 March 2024. Photo by Max Fischer.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
14 January 2025
2.9 MINS
Australia’s virtue signalling High Commissioner to the United Kingdom is doing a backflip, after a massive backlash. Stephen Smith, whose taxpayer-funded income is in the six-figure range, declared on Thursday that he would not be attending a key Australia Day function.
14 January 2025
3.2 MINS
A landmark health meeting will be presented with shocking figures on the number of people with severe psychiatric conditions who are receiving few or no services in the community, as ministers come together to formulate a national response to the nation’s growing mental health crisis.
14 January 2025
4.2 MINS
It is this sustaining hope, envisioning glory to come, that allows us to continue amidst the sin and cruelty that darken our age and sometimes our own relationships closer to home. It empowers us to bear fruit as peacemakers, life givers, lovers of the poor, sick and suffering.
14 January 2025
6.2 MINS
With a number of people dead and thousands of homes and businesses destroyed, the massive fires fuelled by strong winds in Los Angeles have been utterly devastating. The sad truth is this: California leaders and authorities were clearly quite unprepared for these fires.
14 January 2025
5.6 MINS
You probably wouldn’t know it by the legislation they pass and the debates they have, but Capitol Hill is one of the most religious places on earth.
13 January 2025
3.5 MINS
Errol Musk is predicating Tommy Robinson (Stephen Lennon) will one day be Prime Minister. Elon’s estranged and controversial father aired the not-so-batty point in an interview shared to X by The Times Radio on Tuesday.
13 January 2025
7.6 MINS
Depending on which echo chamber you get your news from, last week Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took steps to either save democracy, or to end it. Zuckerberg announced several changes to Meta’s moderation approach, including replacing third-party fact-checkers with a user-driven Community Notes model.
An excellent article, should be printed in newspapers and published online.
The ALRC is parading its blatant hypocrisy : forcefully discriminating against particularly faith-based people and institutions that happen to have a (scientifically-based) different view of sexuality to them. The Productivity Commission is playing that same game. Shameful.
———————————–
Thank you Archbishop Fisher, for articulating so clearly the great value of the church’s many contributions to our society, and the unfair, deliberate – dare I say, hateful – persistent, discrimination of today’s elite ideologues against all things faith based, especially those which call themselves Christian.
The writing on the wall is becoming clearer.
It is pure Communism ! Religion will only be allowed to exist if it becomes a tool of the State and obeys (not the Bible and Jesus’s teachings ) but the UN and what the State dictates.
My children attended Mercedes College (Catholic ) where Jewish and Taiwanese students who were not Christians attended . These were an integral part of the School Family and no attempt was to convert or interfere with their religion or lack of . I met many of my daughter’s Taiwanese friends/ classmates at the School Graduation. They were a funny , happy lot who urged us to visit Taiwan.
This Law is a shameful attack on our Christian religion and we should protest loudly and vote this government out at the next election .