The Problem — and Charm — of Inclusivity
Who cares if a NSW school ditches Mother’s Day for Family Day?
The problem — and the charm — of inclusivity is that it strips everything of meaning.
Take the decision by Hunter Valley Grammar School in New South Wales, for instance, to rename its traditional Mother’s Day Stall a “Family Gift Stall”.
The decision, blasted by mums, was made “for inclusivity reasons”.
Well, isn’t everything about inclusivity these days?
The school explained that they wanted to avoid upsetting “some of the children from non-traditional families who have two dads or may not have a mum present in their lives.”
We can’t have Mother’s Day! Why not? Well, because you wouldn’t want to upset children, would you?
Do you hate kids?
So, because some children don’t have a mother, no children get to celebrate Mother’s Day.
Instead, the school has replaced the specificity of Mother’s Day with the banal generality of Family Day.
Empty Gesture
Inclusivity is charming in that it purports to include everyone. Who wouldn’t support that?
Family Day — and by ‘family’ we mean any and every possible combination and arrangement of human beings you can possibly think of — guarantees that everyone is included.
The problem, of course, is that the event created to include everyone must be so broad that it effectively becomes meaningless.
If everything is a family, then nothing is a family.
Little wonder so many parents at Hunter Valley Grammar reckon “Happy Family Day” rings a little hollow.
Inclusivity argues that because some people can’t be included in something, everybody must be included in nothing.
It is a doctrine of the progressive left that appeals to people’s better angels, but only in order to strip meaning from everything.
Only when all boundaries have been erased, and all definitions made redundant, will the progressive left be contented.
Then, and only then, will they be free to do whatever they want, free of judgement and with nothing to remind them that they are standing with feet planted firmly in mid-air.
___
Republished with thanks to The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Image courtesy of George Dolgikh.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
23 October 2026
13.1 MINS
Tasmania’s proposed conversion practices legislation raises serious questions about religious freedom, pastoral care and whether Christians can freely pray with those seeking to live according to their faith.
23 October 2026
7.7 MINS
Melbourne Catholic Archbishop Peter Comensoli has spoken out clearly against the deadly promises by both major parties in Victoria ahead of the election, drawing a comparison between abortion and capital punishment.
23 October 2026
3.1 MINS
As Western societies grow more hostile, could abandoning Christianity’s moral foundations be contributing to the rise of ideological extremism, political intolerance and violence?
23 October 2026
5.1 MINS
France’s escalating riots expose the dangers of political extremism, antisemitism and radical alliances, offering America a stark warning about the future of Western democracy.
22 October 2026
2.9 MINS
Victoria Labor’s promise to fund free abortions has drawn a forceful response from Presbyterian leaders, raising profound questions about unborn life, government priorities and Australia’s moral direction.
22 October 2026
4.7 MINS
Western Australia’s proposed anti-discrimination overhaul has sparked warnings from Christian leaders that religious freedom, parental choice and faith-based schools’ ability to uphold their beliefs are at risk.
22 October 2026
2.9 MINS
An Israeli political candidate claiming a remarkable biblical identity has sparked questions about false messiahs, the Antichrist and how Christians should interpret prophecy.
What a perfectly succinct explanation