
Male Athletes Dominate Women’s Boxing
The scandal in women’s boxing at the Paris Olympics is a reminder that we must stand up for women and girls in sport and advocate protections for women’s sporting events that previous generations worked so hard to establish.
If you’ve been following the Olympics, you’d be hard pressed to have missed the travesty that’s unfolded in women’s boxing.
In the absence of any sex screening for women’s events, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has allowed two male boxers to compete in the women’s competition. Both boxers have now advanced to the finals and will compete for gold in their respective categories.
This is not only patently unfair, it is incredibly dangerous in a contact sport like boxing.
While the IOC and others continue to obfuscate the issue, claiming the two boxers are women because they “have a passport as a woman”, the International Boxing Association has confirmed that they were disqualified from the world championships last year after a “series of DNA-tests… proved they had XY chromosomes”.
From the information available, it appears the two boxers have ‘differences of sexual development’ (DSDs), meaning they may have been raised female and not exhibited male traits until they began to go through male puberty.
While we can be sensitive to the hardships faced by those with DSDs, this does not excuse putting women’s safety — and their very lives — at risk. It is beyond insane that we are now allowing biological males to punch women in the head in front of the whole world and calling it ‘sport’.
And make no mistake — while the two boxers may not be ‘transgender’ as some people have claimed, it is the IOC’s unapologetic adherence to gender ideology and its commitment to inclusion over safety and fairness that has landed us in this mess in the first place.
Women’s Forum Australia Head of Advocacy Stephanie Bastiaan and I have consistently raised awareness about this issue online and in the media over the past week, including on Sky (here and here), 3AW, 7News and The Epoch Times.

We explained that the reason we even have single-sex sport in the first place is to preserve fairness and safety for female athletes, and that the IOC’s current rules — which effectively allow any male to self-identify into the female sporting category — are manifestly inadequate.
For a more detailed explanation of the biological considerations involved and the surrounding context, I highly recommend these excellent articles by evolutionary biologist Colin Wright, law professor Doriane Coleman, and sport performance coach Linda Blade, as well as these brilliant podcast episodes (here and here) by sports scientist Ross Tucker.
We will continue to stand up for women and girls in sport and to advocate protections for women’s sporting events that previous generations worked so hard to establish. It has been particularly encouraging to see some of the female boxers themselves bravely protesting the unfairness in this instance.
If you haven’t already, please join us is asking our own MPs to restore fairness and safety for women’s sport in Australia and get a FREE copy of our in-depth report, A Fair Playing Field: Protecting Women’s Single-Sex Sport, to help you speak out with confidence on this issue.

And before I sign off — some positive news!
Following immense pushback, independent MP Alex Greenwich’s ‘Equality’ Bill has been delayed again, almost a year after it was introduced. Among other harmful reforms, the Bill allows males to legally identify as female and further erodes protections for female-only spaces and sports in NSW.
So keep speaking out, your voices are being heard!
___
Republished from a Women’s Forum Australia email.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
29 October 2026
5.3 MINS
George Christensen’s frightening hospital visit with his six-year-old daughter offers a powerful reminder that protecting children, born and unborn, begins with love, presence and sacrifice.
29 October 2026
2.6 MINS
A Senate hearing on breastfeeding protections raises questions about sex discrimination law, induced lactation and why the Human Rights Commission paid a consultant to prepare its answers.
29 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Personal liberty cannot flourish without good manners and respect for others. Drawing on J.S. Mill and historic reformers, this piece explores freedom, peaceful protest and the common good.
29 October 2026
3.6 MINS
Dr Michael Youssef warns that radical progressivism and political Islam have formed a dangerous alliance against Western Judeo-Christian values, urging Christians to stand firm in truth.
29 October 2026
3.2 MINS
Liechtenstein’s Hereditary Prince Alois has blocked abortion law reform, defending unborn babies while championing practical support for pregnant women and families facing difficult circumstances.
29 October 2026
3.7 MINS
Are you in a battle, trying to fight in your own strength? Is the Lord asking you to trust in his sovereign rule and to ‘drop your weapon’?
28 October 2026
4 MINS
The assault on Helen Haines highlights Australia’s growing political hostility. Recovering civility requires personal accountability, respectful debate and a renewed commitment to Christian moral foundations.






If these 2 boxers had been disqualified by the international boxing association because they were biological males & therefore they could not compete as females, then they should not have been allowed to compete. The passport isn’t really worth anything as far as stating a persons sex because you change that depending on how you feel on any given day but biology is the same everyday.