Biden Administration Labeled COVID Mandate Opponents as ‘Violent Extremists,’ Docs Reveal
Newly declassified documents reveal the Biden administration flagged COVID-19 mandate critics as possible domestic violent extremists.
Americans who opposed COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates were labelled “domestic violent extremists” by the Biden administration, according to intelligence documents declassified last Friday by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
The classification, first reported by Public and journalist Catherine Herridge, was applied to individuals and groups expressing opposition to vaccine and mask mandates.
The documents were originally compiled in December 2021 by the FBI, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), under the title “DVEs and Foreign Analogues May React Violently to COVID-19 Mitigation Mandates”.
This designation provided an “articulable purpose” for federal agents to begin surveillance or initiate investigations — known as “assessments” — on American citizens who voiced concerns about the Biden admin’s public health policies.
The idea that the Biden administration viewed millions of Americans as a terrorist threat sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it’s not. Newly declassified documents show that in December 2021, the FBI and DHS labeled opponents of Covid mandates “Domestic Violent Extremists.” pic.twitter.com/9GyQdIoptn
— Michael Shellenberger (@shellenberger) May 23, 2025
Vague Definitions Cast a Wide Net
According to the report, critics of COVID-19 mandates were included under the category of “anti-government or anti-authority violent extremists,” particularly those associated with militias or allegedly influenced by QAnon.
Among the so-called “prominent narratives” linked to extremism were:
- Beliefs that COVID-19 vaccines are unsafe, especially for children
- Concerns about loss of civil liberties and livelihoods
- Suspicions of a coordinated government or global agenda
- Fears that mandates would usher in a new political or social order
The report acknowledges that some expressions of dissent may involve constitutionally protected speech, but the line between lawful activism and suspected extremism was left blurred.
“The mere advocacy of political or social positions… may not constitute violent extremism and are constitutionally protected,” the report states. However, such language is followed by caveats that allow agencies to justify monitoring those same expressions.
Former FBI agent Steve Friend told Public that the purpose of the report appeared to be aimed at social media suppression. “It’s a way they could go to social media companies and say, ‘You don’t want to propagate domestic terrorism, so you should take down this content’,” he explained.
NEW: Biden Administration Labeled Opponents Of Covid Mandates As “Domestic Violent Extremists,” Newly Released Documents Show
The designation infringed on the First Amendment and opened the door to investigating Americans for vaccine mandate skepticism.
The Biden Administration… pic.twitter.com/BFbffO0xUC
— Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) May 23, 2025
Free Speech at Risk Under the Guise of Security
Tulsi Gabbard, serving as Director of National Intelligence under President Donald Trump, declassified the reports, stating the documents reveal a troubling trend of criminalising dissent.
Speaking to Fox News, she said, “There’s a consistent thread through here that these ideologies… happen to be people who were using their First Amendment rights to oppose certain policies of the Biden Administration.”
She warned that vague definitions could be exploited to stifle legitimate political discourse: “Some of the examples that are focused on here have to do with those who oppose the COVID vaccine mandates, those who oppose the mask mandates, and parents concerned that their children going to school may be forcibly vaccinated… without the consent or awareness of parents.”
Gabbard explained that while the documents do not outright declare such individuals as terrorists, they place them on what she called a “continuum” — a trajectory from dissent to extremism. In practice, this means anyone expressing opposition to COVID-19 mandates could be flagged for further scrutiny simply because such views are associated with individuals who have committed violent acts.
Her Fox News host likened this logic to a flawed syllogism: “It’s like saying all baseball players wear hats, but then suggesting that everyone who wears a hat must be a baseball player.” The implication, Gabbard warned, is that merely holding contrarian views — such as skepticism about the vaccine rollout — could have been interpreted as a red flag for potential domestic terrorism.
“It’s the weaponisation and politicisation of the intelligence community and national security state against the American people,” Gabbard explained.
The declassified documents can be viewed here.
___
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
16 September 2026
4.7 MINS
Sall Grover is leaving Australia, but not the fight. Following the High Court's refusal to hear her appeal in Giggle v. Tickle, Grover declared she will not call a man a woman — whatever the law says. She won't stop fighting until the law changes.
16 September 2026
6.7 MINS
When Dr Paul Tyson hand-delivered a letter opposing the Digital Duty of Care bill to his local MP's office, he expected a brief exchange. Instead, he left feeling patronised, unheard, and more alarmed than ever.
16 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Before it was ‘Dignity in Dying’, the euthanasia lobby was founded by a medical eugenicist who called the sick a “useless burden”. That dark history didn't disappear — it was just rebranded.
16 September 2026
2.2 MINS
Thirty-seven years after the Berlin Wall fell, socialism is gaining popularity among Americans with no memory of life behind the Iron Curtain. History, however, tells a very different story.
15 September 2026
5.1 MINS
Joshua Broome was a porn star with fame, money, and a drug overdose planned. Trapped in deep shame and guilt, he found forgiveness and his true identity in Jesus Christ, and is now a husband, father, author and pastor.
15 September 2026
3.2 MINS
Many Christians avoid J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series due to a perceived conflict between its themes and Biblical Christianity. Yet according to the author of a recent biography of J. K. Rowling, there is much more to the picture.
15 September 2026
1.7 MINS
The temptation to believe we have special knowledge others don’t is as old as Eden. But Christians must pursue what's true, and stop mistaking suspicion for wisdom and conspiracy for courage.
Shocking news!!!!
I’d bet London to a brick, as the saying goes, that here in Australia the National Cabinet in the ‘COVID years’ would have thought exactly the same about COVID critics and sceptics in Australia. To make matters even worse, I’d wager that a majority of Aussies still do think that COVID Critics and COVID Sceptics are not to be trusted. That we are conspiracy theorists who’s views should be avoided at all costs.