Pandemic Agreement Passes: Will Climate Be the Next Global ‘Emergency’?
Australia has thrown its support behind the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement, raising concerns that future health and even climate emergencies could be used to override national decision-making and democratic accountability.
On May 20th, the 78th World Health Assembly voted to adopt the ‘Pandemic Agreement.’ This comes after three years of negotiation between the various World Health Organization member states that make up the Assembly.
Sadly, as expected, the Australian Government voted in support of the Agreement.
While the Pandemic Agreement might contain overtures about protecting member states’ sovereignty, the practical reality is that the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice and recommendations will invariably shape the decisions sovereign nations make during the next “global health emergency”.
This is particularly concerning given that the preamble to the Pandemic Agreement purports to recognise “the importance and public health impact of growing threats such as climate change”.
Will sovereign nations simply follow WHO recommendations if a “climate emergency” is declared?
The Pandemic Agreement will allow for the transfer of decision-making responsibility away from local decision makers, and into the hands of unaccountable globalist bureaucrats, because captured member states will be readily able to take drastic “health” measures, while purporting to rely on the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice as the justification for their decision.
Rejecting the Pandemic Agreement is Not Enough
How many times during COVID did you hear health officials and politicians tell you they were following “the science”, or acting on “health advice”? I asked to see the health advice underpinning decisions being made in South Australia about how people must live their lives during the pandemic – none was provided!
Over the past three years I have been calling for Australia to oppose this Pandemic Agreement. I have also gone further, suggesting Australia follow the path taken by the United States in withdrawing from the WHO altogether.
The COVID period made it abundantly clear how hazardous it is for democracies to defer their decision-making responsibilities to unelected bureaucrats, especially at the international level.
Decisions about a country’s emergency response are best left to the people of that country, without pressure from globalist bodies.
If Australia is to remain the author of its own future, we must withdraw from the WHO.
___
Image courtesy of Unsplash.
7 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
24 August 2026
3.5 MINS
John Anderson joins Karl Stefanovic to unpack Australia's mounting challenges — from Cultural Marxism and youth values to Net Zero, farming pressures, defence gaps and Labor's economic mismanagement.
24 August 2026
1.9 MINS
Five Sydney Swans players face serious allegations after a hotel party scandal. But watch how quickly "five players" became "all men" — without a shred of extra evidence.
24 August 2026
7.6 MINS
A controversial UK government guide telling asylum seekers about sexual consent has sparked fierce criticism over immigration, public safety and government accountability.
24 August 2026
2.3 MINS
Live Action is fighting back against a cease-and-desist letter accusing it of defaming abortion advocates. Backed by the Thomas More Society, the pro-life group says it will keep calling abortion "killing."
24 August 2026
3.5 MINS
A recap of the Grandparenthood podcast chat on the impact of dads, and a preview of the 2026 Men's Summit at Stanwell Tops, highlighting the National Grandparent Conference happening the same weekend.
21 August 2026
3.8 MINS
On Monday, more than 10,000 baby booties were laid in the shape of a cross on the lawns of Parliament House in Canberra, all pointing towards the chamber where that same morning, Nationals MP Llew O’Brien introduced the Human Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026.
21 August 2026
2.9 MINS
Ardie Savea and Siya Kolisi, rival captains united in faith, worshipped together ahead of Rugby's Greatest Rivalry — revealing how Christ grounds each of them on and off the field.
Yes Please a withdrawal from the WHO would be absolutely fantastic!
Most definitely.
And of course the WHO will never recommend Ivermectin, which had incredible results in countries such as Uttah Pradesh state in India. But was banned in Australia. Big pharma don’t like it, there’s no profit in it. As with many of these issues – follow the money. Also check out the WHO leader’s (Tedros) background, interesting to see where he is coming from
Tick to all of the above.
do you know about Tim Dwyer zoom 9:00? south Australia time Wednesday night. look at
timsTruth on Rumble
to join the zoom
tim@ourtrueaustralia.com
Yes! I agree! Australia is a sovereign nation and as such, we have the sovereign right to make our own decisions! I see this move as another “nail in the coffin “to our autonomy!
Absolutely Alex. We must retain our sovereignty, and not let unelected beaurocrats make our decisions. It could lead to “worldism”, as opposed to “nationalism”. God bless, Ken.