Pandemic Agreement Passes: Will Climate Be the Next Global ‘Emergency’?
Australia has thrown its support behind the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement, raising concerns that future health and even climate emergencies could be used to override national decision-making and democratic accountability.
On May 20th, the 78th World Health Assembly voted to adopt the ‘Pandemic Agreement.’ This comes after three years of negotiation between the various World Health Organization member states that make up the Assembly.
Sadly, as expected, the Australian Government voted in support of the Agreement.
While the Pandemic Agreement might contain overtures about protecting member states’ sovereignty, the practical reality is that the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice and recommendations will invariably shape the decisions sovereign nations make during the next “global health emergency”.
This is particularly concerning given that the preamble to the Pandemic Agreement purports to recognise “the importance and public health impact of growing threats such as climate change”.
Will sovereign nations simply follow WHO recommendations if a “climate emergency” is declared?
The Pandemic Agreement will allow for the transfer of decision-making responsibility away from local decision makers, and into the hands of unaccountable globalist bureaucrats, because captured member states will be readily able to take drastic “health” measures, while purporting to rely on the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice as the justification for their decision.
Rejecting the Pandemic Agreement is Not Enough
How many times during COVID did you hear health officials and politicians tell you they were following “the science”, or acting on “health advice”? I asked to see the health advice underpinning decisions being made in South Australia about how people must live their lives during the pandemic – none was provided!
Over the past three years I have been calling for Australia to oppose this Pandemic Agreement. I have also gone further, suggesting Australia follow the path taken by the United States in withdrawing from the WHO altogether.
The COVID period made it abundantly clear how hazardous it is for democracies to defer their decision-making responsibilities to unelected bureaucrats, especially at the international level.
Decisions about a country’s emergency response are best left to the people of that country, without pressure from globalist bodies.
If Australia is to remain the author of its own future, we must withdraw from the WHO.
___
Image courtesy of Unsplash.
7 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
14 September 2026
4.5 MINS
Moira Deeming says the public hasn't heard the full story of what happened to her inside the Victorian Liberal Party — and now, after joining Family First, she's ready to tell it.
14 September 2026
9.7 MINS
The word of God is living and active, and Christians across history have taken that seriously. A new Melbourne Bible Reading initiative is joining a global movement to read Scripture publicly — and you can be part of it.
14 September 2026
4.9 MINS
The Albanese Government Digital Duty of Care Bill could give an unelected commissioner the power to suppress free speech online — and Senator Alex Antic is leading the fight to stop it.
14 September 2026
6 MINS
The UK Parliament has delivered a major victory for the sanctity of life, voting down an assisted suicide bill that opponents warned would have opened the door to the legalised killing of vulnerable people.
14 September 2026
4.3 MINS
Healing only happens when men stop being silent — and Men's Leadership Summits exist to make that possible, giving men a safe place to face their pain and begin to heal.
11 September 2026
3.3 MINS
Moira Deeming has joined Family First as its lead Victorian candidate, pledging to contest the 28 November state election and continue her fight for child safeguards, faith, and sex-based rights.
11 September 2026
7.9 MINS
10 September marks the one-year anniversary of Charlie Kirk's assassination. Reflecting on his legacy, let's pray for his family and that we continue the mission God has called us to.
Yes Please a withdrawal from the WHO would be absolutely fantastic!
Most definitely.
And of course the WHO will never recommend Ivermectin, which had incredible results in countries such as Uttah Pradesh state in India. But was banned in Australia. Big pharma don’t like it, there’s no profit in it. As with many of these issues – follow the money. Also check out the WHO leader’s (Tedros) background, interesting to see where he is coming from
Tick to all of the above.
do you know about Tim Dwyer zoom 9:00? south Australia time Wednesday night. look at
timsTruth on Rumble
to join the zoom
tim@ourtrueaustralia.com
Yes! I agree! Australia is a sovereign nation and as such, we have the sovereign right to make our own decisions! I see this move as another “nail in the coffin “to our autonomy!
Absolutely Alex. We must retain our sovereignty, and not let unelected beaurocrats make our decisions. It could lead to “worldism”, as opposed to “nationalism”. God bless, Ken.