Pandemic Agreement Passes: Will Climate Be the Next Global ‘Emergency’?
Australia has thrown its support behind the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement, raising concerns that future health and even climate emergencies could be used to override national decision-making and democratic accountability.
On May 20th, the 78th World Health Assembly voted to adopt the ‘Pandemic Agreement.’ This comes after three years of negotiation between the various World Health Organization member states that make up the Assembly.
Sadly, as expected, the Australian Government voted in support of the Agreement.
While the Pandemic Agreement might contain overtures about protecting member states’ sovereignty, the practical reality is that the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice and recommendations will invariably shape the decisions sovereign nations make during the next “global health emergency”.
This is particularly concerning given that the preamble to the Pandemic Agreement purports to recognise “the importance and public health impact of growing threats such as climate change”.
Will sovereign nations simply follow WHO recommendations if a “climate emergency” is declared?
The Pandemic Agreement will allow for the transfer of decision-making responsibility away from local decision makers, and into the hands of unaccountable globalist bureaucrats, because captured member states will be readily able to take drastic “health” measures, while purporting to rely on the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice as the justification for their decision.
Rejecting the Pandemic Agreement is Not Enough
How many times during COVID did you hear health officials and politicians tell you they were following “the science”, or acting on “health advice”? I asked to see the health advice underpinning decisions being made in South Australia about how people must live their lives during the pandemic – none was provided!
Over the past three years I have been calling for Australia to oppose this Pandemic Agreement. I have also gone further, suggesting Australia follow the path taken by the United States in withdrawing from the WHO altogether.
The COVID period made it abundantly clear how hazardous it is for democracies to defer their decision-making responsibilities to unelected bureaucrats, especially at the international level.
Decisions about a country’s emergency response are best left to the people of that country, without pressure from globalist bodies.
If Australia is to remain the author of its own future, we must withdraw from the WHO.
___
Image courtesy of Unsplash.
7 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
24 June 2026
4.8 MINS
After scoring the sixth-fastest goal in FIFA's 2026 World Cup, Christian footballer Felix Nmecha dropped to one knee and symbolically laid his crown at the feet of Christ. It's a gesture that captures everything about him: faith first, football second.
24 June 2026
2.9 MINS
If you’re a parent or a grandparent, you probably worry about what your child or grandchild is learning at school. In the first of its kind in Australia, a survey has been launched to measure parent attitudes to Respectful Relationship sessions in schools.
24 June 2026
5.9 MINS
Nation First looks into Keir Starmer’s resignation and why Anthony Albanese should be worried by the same policy failures now haunting Labor at home.
24 June 2026
4.1 MINS
Rupert Lowe has just released The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. Occurring over decades, some 250,000 girls were raped, tortured, and abused, with some even killed. Yet authorities and the media covered up these diabolical crimes in the interests of not being 'racist' and 'Islamophobic'.
24 June 2026
9.8 MINS
Starmer’s reign was characterised by periods of unrest and violence, massive scandals and a two-tiered justice system that targeted Brits while giving special treatment to Muslim immigrants. The Rape Gang Report alleges Starmer allowed 13,000 Muslim rapists go with letters of warning, while Brits who spoke up against the injustice were penalised.
23 June 2026
5.4 MINS
Gabbard released 1,600 pages of declassified documents on her final day in office revealing how the intelligence community built a protective structure around Fauci and defended it in the name of national security.
23 June 2026
4 MINS
Christian, captain and soccer legend Lionel “Leo” Messi is giving all the glory to God as he makes FIFA 2026 World Cup headlines. The Argentinian is widely respected for his integrity, humility and the way he carries himself on and off the pitch.
Yes Please a withdrawal from the WHO would be absolutely fantastic!
Most definitely.
And of course the WHO will never recommend Ivermectin, which had incredible results in countries such as Uttah Pradesh state in India. But was banned in Australia. Big pharma don’t like it, there’s no profit in it. As with many of these issues – follow the money. Also check out the WHO leader’s (Tedros) background, interesting to see where he is coming from
Tick to all of the above.
do you know about Tim Dwyer zoom 9:00? south Australia time Wednesday night. look at
timsTruth on Rumble
to join the zoom
tim@ourtrueaustralia.com
Yes! I agree! Australia is a sovereign nation and as such, we have the sovereign right to make our own decisions! I see this move as another “nail in the coffin “to our autonomy!
Absolutely Alex. We must retain our sovereignty, and not let unelected beaurocrats make our decisions. It could lead to “worldism”, as opposed to “nationalism”. God bless, Ken.