Pandemic Agreement Passes: Will Climate Be the Next Global ‘Emergency’?
Australia has thrown its support behind the WHO’s Pandemic Agreement, raising concerns that future health and even climate emergencies could be used to override national decision-making and democratic accountability.
On May 20th, the 78th World Health Assembly voted to adopt the ‘Pandemic Agreement.’ This comes after three years of negotiation between the various World Health Organization member states that make up the Assembly.
Sadly, as expected, the Australian Government voted in support of the Agreement.
While the Pandemic Agreement might contain overtures about protecting member states’ sovereignty, the practical reality is that the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice and recommendations will invariably shape the decisions sovereign nations make during the next “global health emergency”.
This is particularly concerning given that the preamble to the Pandemic Agreement purports to recognise “the importance and public health impact of growing threats such as climate change”.
Will sovereign nations simply follow WHO recommendations if a “climate emergency” is declared?
The Pandemic Agreement will allow for the transfer of decision-making responsibility away from local decision makers, and into the hands of unaccountable globalist bureaucrats, because captured member states will be readily able to take drastic “health” measures, while purporting to rely on the Pandemic Agreement and the WHO’s advice as the justification for their decision.
Rejecting the Pandemic Agreement is Not Enough
How many times during COVID did you hear health officials and politicians tell you they were following “the science”, or acting on “health advice”? I asked to see the health advice underpinning decisions being made in South Australia about how people must live their lives during the pandemic – none was provided!
Over the past three years I have been calling for Australia to oppose this Pandemic Agreement. I have also gone further, suggesting Australia follow the path taken by the United States in withdrawing from the WHO altogether.
The COVID period made it abundantly clear how hazardous it is for democracies to defer their decision-making responsibilities to unelected bureaucrats, especially at the international level.
Decisions about a country’s emergency response are best left to the people of that country, without pressure from globalist bodies.
If Australia is to remain the author of its own future, we must withdraw from the WHO.
___
Image courtesy of Unsplash.
7 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
15 July 2026
4.2 MINS
Multi-platinum rock band Skillet has achieved major mainstream success while openly maintaining a committed Christian faith, resisting industry pressure to downplay their evangelical beliefs. Lead singer John Cooper, known for his vocal faith, has testified to the power of the gospel, which the band brings to a global audience through their music.
15 July 2026
3.9 MINS
UK authorities are treating the murder of devout Christian and former British MP Ann Widdecombe as domestic terrorism.
15 July 2026
4.4 MINS
In an age when our Prime Minister openly jokes about 'shagging' and candidly discusses his marital sex life, we might think the question of modesty is settled. It's not. In fact, it's never been more urgent.
15 July 2026
16.4 MINS
Months of public statements by conspiracy theorist commentator Candace Owens about Charlie Kirk's death are facing a legal reckoning in Utah. As evidence mounts against Tyler Robinson and witnesses take the stand, her narrative is crumbling under courtroom scrutiny.
15 July 2026
4.6 MINS
Despite the medical pendulum swinging against it, a mainline American denomination has thrown its full support behind the crumbling facade of transgender medicine. The Presbyterian Church (USA) voted overwhelmingly to declare support for access 'transgender medical procedures'.
14 July 2026
3.4 MINS
Riding a wave of viral success from high-profile debates, biblical scholar Wes Huff will teach a new eight-part course on the Historical Reliability of the Bible through Dr. Jordan Peterson's Academy. The course will cover topics from canon formation to archaeological data and the historical Jesus.
14 July 2026
3.9 MINS
The Greens are pushing an "anti-conversion practices" bill that goes further than anything we've seen in other states — and it should alarm every Australian Christian, parent, and, actually, everyone — not just Tasmanians. Please pray for Tasmania.
Yes Please a withdrawal from the WHO would be absolutely fantastic!
Most definitely.
And of course the WHO will never recommend Ivermectin, which had incredible results in countries such as Uttah Pradesh state in India. But was banned in Australia. Big pharma don’t like it, there’s no profit in it. As with many of these issues – follow the money. Also check out the WHO leader’s (Tedros) background, interesting to see where he is coming from
Tick to all of the above.
do you know about Tim Dwyer zoom 9:00? south Australia time Wednesday night. look at
timsTruth on Rumble
to join the zoom
tim@ourtrueaustralia.com
Yes! I agree! Australia is a sovereign nation and as such, we have the sovereign right to make our own decisions! I see this move as another “nail in the coffin “to our autonomy!
Absolutely Alex. We must retain our sovereignty, and not let unelected beaurocrats make our decisions. It could lead to “worldism”, as opposed to “nationalism”. God bless, Ken.