Concerns have been raised that Premier Chris Minns may be seeking to limit scrutiny of his government’s recently introduced hate speech laws.
The inquiry is demanding answers about the relationship between hate speech legislation and the January caravan bomb hoax in Dural.
Some critics allege that the government acted on the Dural terrorism threat despite indications it may not have been credible, pushing hate speech laws under the banner of public safety.
NSW Labor did this without genuine regard for debate and the democratic process.
‘Serious and Grave Concerns’: MLC Rod Roberts
Members of the inquiry are concerned about the government’s resistance to full participation in the investigation into the hate speech laws.
8 legislative council (LC) members of the Select Committee are reportedly frustrated by “some witnesses trying to avoid” testifying.
Rod Roberts, who began the investigation, said members had “serious and grave concerns because witnesses were declining to attend, using spurious and tenuous arguments.”
The LC Select Committee comprises NSW Libertarian John Ruddick, one Liberal, three Labor, one National and one Greens member.
Roberts is the chair.
Their concerns are justifiable, wrote leftwing Sydney Criminal Lawyers journalist, Paul Gregoire.
Premier Minns’ Interference
Premier Minns’ interference began the moment he petitioned the Speaker to stop MPs from answering questions.
Minns muddied up the push for transparency, taking issue with the Select Committee’s terms of reference.
In true bureaucratic style, Minns wanted a second committee “to gauge whether the investigation can continue.”
This is because he regards the inquiry’s tone as threatening.
Terms of reference, Minns argued, could “threaten parliamentary privilege of the legislative assembly,” and disrupt the relationship between the Assembly and the Council.
According to Gregoire, the speaker gave Minns a pass.
Subsequently, key staff from the Attorney General, and police minister’s offices told the inquiry they were not available for questioning.
Staffers from the Premier’s office only showed up, Gregoire recalled, because Roberts talked tough and threatened to summon them to the hearing.
Like an upside-down episode of Hogan’s Heroes, the bureaucrats all said they knew nothing.
“Minns is now gearing up to have another committee attempt to end the inquiry,” Gregoire concluded.
An inquiry that is “currently scrutinising his dubious lawmaking actions, in passing a series of laws based on a manufactured antisemitic scare campaign.”
Hasty Hate Speech Law?
The Roberts inquiry into Minns’ hasty hate speech legislation has nine stated goals.
The primary pursuit, Roberts said in a press release on 4 April was “accountability and ensuring the integrity of our parliamentary processes.”
“The public must have confidence that members of Parliament are informed of all available facts before passing legislation,” Roberts asserted.
“This inquiry will investigate whether the hate speech and protest laws were introduced and debated based on misleading or incomplete information.”
With this kind of spotlight, there’s ample reason for why Premier Chris Minns might want the inquiry quashed.
John Ruddick shared some of the second meeting on X, saying he “asked top bureaucrats whether the government rushed through its anti-free speech laws in response to what we now know was a ‘criminal con-job.’”
“They obfuscated, and Labor members got cranky.”
Labor’s Hamletian, ‘doth protest too much’ against Ruddick’s tone during this second sitting, suggests Gregoire’s observations are not all that far off the mark.
___
Originally published at Caldron Pool. Image via YouTube/ABC News.
NSW Premier Chris Minns Accused of Stonewalling Inquiry into Hasty Hate Speech Laws
29 May 2025
2.3 MINS
Concerns have been raised that Premier Chris Minns may be seeking to limit scrutiny of his government’s recently introduced hate speech laws.
The inquiry is demanding answers about the relationship between hate speech legislation and the January caravan bomb hoax in Dural.
Some critics allege that the government acted on the Dural terrorism threat despite indications it may not have been credible, pushing hate speech laws under the banner of public safety.
NSW Labor did this without genuine regard for debate and the democratic process.
‘Serious and Grave Concerns’: MLC Rod Roberts
Members of the inquiry are concerned about the government’s resistance to full participation in the investigation into the hate speech laws.
8 legislative council (LC) members of the Select Committee are reportedly frustrated by “some witnesses trying to avoid” testifying.
Rod Roberts, who began the investigation, said members had “serious and grave concerns because witnesses were declining to attend, using spurious and tenuous arguments.”
The LC Select Committee comprises NSW Libertarian John Ruddick, one Liberal, three Labor, one National and one Greens member.
Roberts is the chair.
Their concerns are justifiable, wrote leftwing Sydney Criminal Lawyers journalist, Paul Gregoire.
Premier Minns’ Interference
Premier Minns’ interference began the moment he petitioned the Speaker to stop MPs from answering questions.
Minns muddied up the push for transparency, taking issue with the Select Committee’s terms of reference.
In true bureaucratic style, Minns wanted a second committee “to gauge whether the investigation can continue.”
This is because he regards the inquiry’s tone as threatening.
Terms of reference, Minns argued, could “threaten parliamentary privilege of the legislative assembly,” and disrupt the relationship between the Assembly and the Council.
According to Gregoire, the speaker gave Minns a pass.
Subsequently, key staff from the Attorney General, and police minister’s offices told the inquiry they were not available for questioning.
Staffers from the Premier’s office only showed up, Gregoire recalled, because Roberts talked tough and threatened to summon them to the hearing.
Like an upside-down episode of Hogan’s Heroes, the bureaucrats all said they knew nothing.
“Minns is now gearing up to have another committee attempt to end the inquiry,” Gregoire concluded.
An inquiry that is “currently scrutinising his dubious lawmaking actions, in passing a series of laws based on a manufactured antisemitic scare campaign.”
Hasty Hate Speech Law?
The Roberts inquiry into Minns’ hasty hate speech legislation has nine stated goals.
The primary pursuit, Roberts said in a press release on 4 April was “accountability and ensuring the integrity of our parliamentary processes.”
“The public must have confidence that members of Parliament are informed of all available facts before passing legislation,” Roberts asserted.
With this kind of spotlight, there’s ample reason for why Premier Chris Minns might want the inquiry quashed.
John Ruddick shared some of the second meeting on X, saying he “asked top bureaucrats whether the government rushed through its anti-free speech laws in response to what we now know was a ‘criminal con-job.’”
“They obfuscated, and Labor members got cranky.”
Labor’s Hamletian, ‘doth protest too much’ against Ruddick’s tone during this second sitting, suggests Gregoire’s observations are not all that far off the mark.
___
Originally published at Caldron Pool. Image via YouTube/ABC News.
About the Author: Rod Lampard
Australia / COMMENTARY / Fairness & Justice
SHARE >
We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.
Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.
Recent Articles:
New Film Exposes Scandal – Babies Born Alive but Left to Die
25 June 2026
2.4 MINS
The Australian Christian Lobby is hosting screenings of the groundbreaking documentary Born Alive, Left to Die across Australia. It is time for truth, accountability, and change. Attend a screening and invite others to join you.
Australia’s New Worldview Cannot Sustain a Just Legal System
25 June 2026
3.9 MINS
Most Australians still believe in human dignity and inalienable rights, essential truths for a just legal system. What they’ve since abandoned is the only foundation that make those beliefs coherent.
US Men’s Soccer Team Puts Faith on the Field, Sending Legacy Media Scrambling to Understand Why
25 June 2026
4.3 MINS
The U.S. Men's team has twice concluded a World Cup match by coming together to pray, with increasing Christian expression during the tournament catching secular media off-guard.
Wikipedia’s Neutrality Is Dead — And Blocking Its Own Founder Proves It
25 June 2026
3.2 MINS
Larry Sanger helped create Wikipedia to be "the free encyclopaedia anyone can edit." Three decades later, he's been locked out — for trying to make the site more balanced.
ABC Refuses to Publish Opinion Piece by Sall Grover on Women’s Sex-Based Rights
25 June 2026
5.4 MINS
For three weeks, Women's Rights advocate Sall Grover tried to have an opinion piece published on the ABC. But the taxpayer-funded organisation refused, saying that terms such as ‘biological reality’ and ‘truth’ were offensive.
Felix Nmecha’s FIFA World Cup “Crown Down” Salute to God Explained
24 June 2026
4.8 MINS
After scoring the sixth-fastest goal in FIFA's 2026 World Cup, Christian footballer Felix Nmecha dropped to one knee and symbolically laid his crown at the feet of Christ. It's a gesture that captures everything about him: faith first, football second.
Parents, Your Voice Matters: National Survey on School Gender Education
24 June 2026
2.9 MINS
If you’re a parent or a grandparent, you probably worry about what your child or grandchild is learning at school. In the first of its kind in Australia, a survey has been launched to measure parent attitudes to Respectful Relationship sessions in schools.
Use your voice today to protect
Faith · Family · Freedom · Life
MOST POPULAR
ABOUT
The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.
MOST COMMENTS
GOOD NEWS
HALL OF FAME
BROWSE TOPICS
BROWSE GENRES