
Humbly Relying on Almighty God — Remember When Australia Did That?
We’ve traded faith for fragility, unity for division. It’s time to return to the values that made this country great.
- Australia was founded as a Christian nation, and our Constitution reflects that heritage, beginning with the words “Humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.”
- Section 116 was never intended to make Australia secular, it was written by our Christian founders to prevent state interference in religion, not to remove Christianity from public life.
- Historical figures like Henry Parkes affirmed that Australia’s laws, system of governance, and Constitution were based on Christian belief.
- Modern left-wing activists and judges have deliberately misinterpreted Section 116 to portray Australia as a secular country, distorting its original intent and historical truth.
- Christianity has been the moral and cultural foundation of Australia’s unity, prosperity, and national identity, drifting away from it has led to division, confusion, and moral decline.
Australia was founded as a Christian country and has always remained so. Any attempts by the Left to deny this crucial part of our history must be met with strong resistance.
Constitutional Provision
The Left will argue that Australia is a secular, non-religious nation because Section 116 of the Australian Constitution states:
“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion… or prohibiting the free exercise of any religion…”
Sounds modern and inclusive, right? Wrong! Proves their point? No! It does the opposite!
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
24 June 2026
4.8 MINS
After scoring the sixth-fastest goal in FIFA's 2026 World Cup, Christian footballer Felix Nmecha dropped to one knee and symbolically laid his crown at the feet of Christ. It's a gesture that captures everything about him: faith first, football second.
24 June 2026
2.9 MINS
If you’re a parent or a grandparent, you probably worry about what your child or grandchild is learning at school. In the first of its kind in Australia, a survey has been launched to measure parent attitudes to Respectful Relationship sessions in schools.
24 June 2026
5.9 MINS
Nation First looks into Keir Starmer’s resignation and why Anthony Albanese should be worried by the same policy failures now haunting Labor at home.
24 June 2026
4.1 MINS
Rupert Lowe has just released The Rape Gang Inquiry Report. Occurring over decades, some 250,000 girls were raped, tortured, and abused, with some even killed. Yet authorities and the media covered up these diabolical crimes in the interests of not being 'racist' and 'Islamophobic'.
24 June 2026
9.8 MINS
Starmer’s reign was characterised by periods of unrest and violence, massive scandals and a two-tiered justice system that targeted Brits while giving special treatment to Muslim immigrants. The Rape Gang Report alleges Starmer allowed 13,000 Muslim rapists go with letters of warning, while Brits who spoke up against the injustice were penalised.
23 June 2026
5.4 MINS
Gabbard released 1,600 pages of declassified documents on her final day in office revealing how the intelligence community built a protective structure around Fauci and defended it in the name of national security.
23 June 2026
4 MINS
Christian, captain and soccer legend Lionel “Leo” Messi is giving all the glory to God as he makes FIFA 2026 World Cup headlines. The Argentinian is widely respected for his integrity, humility and the way he carries himself on and off the pitch.






Great article. There are heaps of State and Federal Government laws now that are used by third parties to target Christians in the courts, particularly by LGTB etc. groups, medical authorities, and woke companies. The Constitution says that no laws shall be made that inhibit the free exercise of religion. The free exercise of religion (Christianity in this case) inherently involves the right to proclaim biblical beliefs. To me, these laws violate the Australian Constitution, and I wonder why I never hear of anybody or group who are targetted in the courts using this as a defence. Maybe they do and the courts ignore this.
Aye, there’s the problem: Section 116 does not restrict the states from doing whatever they want with regard to religion. An amendment is needed. Perhaps this:
The Commonwealth, nor any government of a state or territory which is part of the Commonwealth, shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth or said states or territories.
Great comments. Regarding Federal and State law, my understanding is that, if there is a Federal law on anything, then this overrides any state law on the same thing. In this case, if State law attacks and inhibits the free exercise of religion (e.g. praying for the healing of a sexually confused person), then Federal law makes this illegal as it overrides the State law.