
Humbly Relying on Almighty God — Remember When Australia Did That?
We’ve traded faith for fragility, unity for division. It’s time to return to the values that made this country great.
- Australia was founded as a Christian nation, and our Constitution reflects that heritage, beginning with the words “Humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.”
- Section 116 was never intended to make Australia secular, it was written by our Christian founders to prevent state interference in religion, not to remove Christianity from public life.
- Historical figures like Henry Parkes affirmed that Australia’s laws, system of governance, and Constitution were based on Christian belief.
- Modern left-wing activists and judges have deliberately misinterpreted Section 116 to portray Australia as a secular country, distorting its original intent and historical truth.
- Christianity has been the moral and cultural foundation of Australia’s unity, prosperity, and national identity, drifting away from it has led to division, confusion, and moral decline.
Australia was founded as a Christian country and has always remained so. Any attempts by the Left to deny this crucial part of our history must be met with strong resistance.
Constitutional Provision
The Left will argue that Australia is a secular, non-religious nation because Section 116 of the Australian Constitution states:
“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion… or prohibiting the free exercise of any religion…”
Sounds modern and inclusive, right? Wrong! Proves their point? No! It does the opposite!
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
17 July 2026
15.2 MINS
The Church is wimpy, and it's destroying the nation. That's the blunt assessment of Rev. Chris Wickland, a UK clergyman who refuses to soften the gospel for perceived cultural acceptance. And he has a point. From the rise of "woke" institutional Christianity to the abdication of prophetic witness, the modern Church has traded its backbone for a desperate attempt to attain a disappearing seat at the table.
17 July 2026
4.5 MINS
Landlords have shut the door on the LGBTQ+ desecration of a former Sydney Catholic Church and theatre named after saints.
17 July 2026
3.8 MINS
Jillian Spencer, a Queensland psychiatrist suspended for questioning childhood gender treatments, has been cleared by AHPRA, as her hospital prepares to release its own statement.
17 July 2026
4 MINS
In a sign of the continuing breakdown of religious freedom in Europe, Finnish parliament member Päivi Räsänen was banned by the U.K. from traveling to Heathrow Airport for a planned layover due to her Finnish Supreme Court conviction in March for authoring a pamphlet containing supposed “hate speech” toward those who identify as LGBT.
17 July 2026
2.9 MINS
Questions on the environment produced the most lopsided results of any category tested, with every single model favouring climate concerns over growth. Removing one model’s “safety” layer moved its religion score from secular-leaning to neutral.
17 July 2026
4.7 MINS
As tensions between America and Iran escalate, foreign policy experts urge discernment in distinguishing between regimes that keep their word and those — like Tehran — that operate through deception and aggression, a lesson as old as Scripture itself.
16 July 2026
5 MINS
We're told that progressive politics equals compassion, inclusion and kindness. But shocking reactions to Ann Widdecombe's murder — celebrating her death and hoping she died in extreme pain — reveal the socialist left's blatant 'hate speech' hypocrisy and disturbing double standards of the highest degree.






Great article. There are heaps of State and Federal Government laws now that are used by third parties to target Christians in the courts, particularly by LGTB etc. groups, medical authorities, and woke companies. The Constitution says that no laws shall be made that inhibit the free exercise of religion. The free exercise of religion (Christianity in this case) inherently involves the right to proclaim biblical beliefs. To me, these laws violate the Australian Constitution, and I wonder why I never hear of anybody or group who are targetted in the courts using this as a defence. Maybe they do and the courts ignore this.
Aye, there’s the problem: Section 116 does not restrict the states from doing whatever they want with regard to religion. An amendment is needed. Perhaps this:
The Commonwealth, nor any government of a state or territory which is part of the Commonwealth, shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth or said states or territories.
Great comments. Regarding Federal and State law, my understanding is that, if there is a Federal law on anything, then this overrides any state law on the same thing. In this case, if State law attacks and inhibits the free exercise of religion (e.g. praying for the healing of a sexually confused person), then Federal law makes this illegal as it overrides the State law.