
Humbly Relying on Almighty God — Remember When Australia Did That?
We’ve traded faith for fragility, unity for division. It’s time to return to the values that made this country great.
- Australia was founded as a Christian nation, and our Constitution reflects that heritage, beginning with the words “Humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God.”
- Section 116 was never intended to make Australia secular, it was written by our Christian founders to prevent state interference in religion, not to remove Christianity from public life.
- Historical figures like Henry Parkes affirmed that Australia’s laws, system of governance, and Constitution were based on Christian belief.
- Modern left-wing activists and judges have deliberately misinterpreted Section 116 to portray Australia as a secular country, distorting its original intent and historical truth.
- Christianity has been the moral and cultural foundation of Australia’s unity, prosperity, and national identity, drifting away from it has led to division, confusion, and moral decline.
Australia was founded as a Christian country and has always remained so. Any attempts by the Left to deny this crucial part of our history must be met with strong resistance.
Constitutional Provision
The Left will argue that Australia is a secular, non-religious nation because Section 116 of the Australian Constitution states:
“The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion… or prohibiting the free exercise of any religion…”
Sounds modern and inclusive, right? Wrong! Proves their point? No! It does the opposite!
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
13 August 2026
2.4 MINS
Young Conservatives for Christ will host a free online screening of the Australian Christian Lobby’s Born Alive Left to Die documentary on 25 August, featuring young Australian pro-life advocates.
13 August 2026
10.6 MINS
Explore the biblical case for Jesus’ divinity, equipping Christians to answer Muslim objections and confidently proclaim the Gospel with Scripture, clarity, and grace.
13 August 2026
3.2 MINS
A reflection on The Recharge, where young Christians gathered to confront cultural challenges, build community, seek God’s wisdom, and embrace their responsibility to act.
13 August 2026
4.8 MINS
A fierce critique of Massachusetts abortion policy killing babies up to full term, examining claims about late-term abortion, the moral contradictions involved, and the fierce reaction it has provoked.
13 August 2026
3.8 MINS
Australia has abandoned its Christian foundations. Only revival and courageous Christian witness can reverse the nation's moral decline.
13 August 2026
3.2 MINS
Jeremiah 1:5 tells us that God knew us before we were formed in the womb. This reminds us that each life — whether inside or outside the womb — is precious to him.
12 August 2026
5.6 MINS
Two years after FBI agents visited her home, whistleblower Vanessa Sivadge’s case has led to a landmark settlement that compels Texas Children’s Hospital to open a detransition clinic for patients harmed by its sex-change procedures.






Great article. There are heaps of State and Federal Government laws now that are used by third parties to target Christians in the courts, particularly by LGTB etc. groups, medical authorities, and woke companies. The Constitution says that no laws shall be made that inhibit the free exercise of religion. The free exercise of religion (Christianity in this case) inherently involves the right to proclaim biblical beliefs. To me, these laws violate the Australian Constitution, and I wonder why I never hear of anybody or group who are targetted in the courts using this as a defence. Maybe they do and the courts ignore this.
Aye, there’s the problem: Section 116 does not restrict the states from doing whatever they want with regard to religion. An amendment is needed. Perhaps this:
The Commonwealth, nor any government of a state or territory which is part of the Commonwealth, shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth or said states or territories.
Great comments. Regarding Federal and State law, my understanding is that, if there is a Federal law on anything, then this overrides any state law on the same thing. In this case, if State law attacks and inhibits the free exercise of religion (e.g. praying for the healing of a sexually confused person), then Federal law makes this illegal as it overrides the State law.