Free Speech: Reasonable Qualifications
Free speech is the lifeblood of a healthy society. But there are some legitimate constraints on free speech, in my view.
1) Defamation: the injury that can be done to individuals as a consequence of making false accusations in a digital age are so severe that there must be measures in place to deter such speech and legal recourse for those injured by it (think of the damage from a false accusation of abuse, for instance);
2) Copyright: individuals are entitled to the economic benefits of their creative and intellectual property. There can be no free speech defence for stealing and monetising someone else’s intellectual property, particularly when that property comes in the form of speech (a book, for instance);
3) Incitement to violence: terrorists do not have the right to exercise their speech to plot and executive acts of violence, nor to encourage and facilitate violence from others;
4) National security: individuals do not have the right to sell national secrets to adversaries, nor to publicly broadcast sensitive information about defence assets, capabilities, plans, nor the identities of intelligence officers and the agents they recruit.
Some qualifications:
Notice the things which are not on my list of legitimate constraints: offence and hate speech.
The challenge is that once you accept that there are some legitimate constraints on free speech, then you are locked into a difficult balancing act, in which the constraints are perpetually challenged by ambiguous cases on the periphery, and an ever-present temptation to increase the scope of the constraints and to misuse them for illegitimate purposes.
I see no way around this, in which case the very limited number of legitimate constraints on free speech must be carefully and vigilantly circumscribed, always erring on the side of a high threshold for their application.
We are moving further and further away from this balance, I’m sorry to say.
___
Originally published on Dr Jonathan Cole’s page.
Subscribe to his podcast, The Political Animals, for more insights.
Photo by Mathias Reding.
Recent Articles:
27 August 2026
4.8 MINS
Bishop Fulton Sheen argued Communism and capitalism share a common root—materialism divorced from morality. That affinity, this piece argues, explains China's persecution of Christians today.
27 August 2026
2.6 MINS
Religious leaders are urging Labor to exempt faith-based charities from its new 30 per cent discretionary trust tax, warning the reform could severely cut philanthropic funding for vulnerable Australians.
26 August 2026
1.6 MINS
Victoria's cults inquiry report lacks clear definitions and religious freedom safeguards. ACL welcomes support for survivors but warns mainstream churches and homeschooling families could be wrongly caught up.
26 August 2026
4.5 MINS
Hindu Dara Singh, convicted for burning missionary Graham Staines and his sons alive in 1999, is seeking early release. His case reopens questions about justice, remorse, and religious violence in India.
25 August 2026
10 MINS
When Sophie Cunningham's comments on transgender athletes in women's sports went viral, a WNBA sideshow became something bigger: a clash between two rival stories about creation, identity, and redemption.
25 August 2026
2.9 MINS
A look at the recurring cycle of socialist revolutions promising utopia and delivering collapse — and how Mexico City's push to restore statues of Castro and Guevara reveals this pattern persists today.
24 August 2026
2.3 MINS
Live Action is fighting back against a cease-and-desist letter accusing it of defaming abortion advocates. Backed by the Thomas More Society, the pro-life group says it will keep calling abortion "killing."
