Free Speech: Reasonable Qualifications
Free speech is the lifeblood of a healthy society. But there are some legitimate constraints on free speech, in my view.
1) Defamation: the injury that can be done to individuals as a consequence of making false accusations in a digital age are so severe that there must be measures in place to deter such speech and legal recourse for those injured by it (think of the damage from a false accusation of abuse, for instance);
2) Copyright: individuals are entitled to the economic benefits of their creative and intellectual property. There can be no free speech defence for stealing and monetising someone else’s intellectual property, particularly when that property comes in the form of speech (a book, for instance);
3) Incitement to violence: terrorists do not have the right to exercise their speech to plot and executive acts of violence, nor to encourage and facilitate violence from others;
4) National security: individuals do not have the right to sell national secrets to adversaries, nor to publicly broadcast sensitive information about defence assets, capabilities, plans, nor the identities of intelligence officers and the agents they recruit.
Some qualifications:
Notice the things which are not on my list of legitimate constraints: offence and hate speech.
The challenge is that once you accept that there are some legitimate constraints on free speech, then you are locked into a difficult balancing act, in which the constraints are perpetually challenged by ambiguous cases on the periphery, and an ever-present temptation to increase the scope of the constraints and to misuse them for illegitimate purposes.
I see no way around this, in which case the very limited number of legitimate constraints on free speech must be carefully and vigilantly circumscribed, always erring on the side of a high threshold for their application.
We are moving further and further away from this balance, I’m sorry to say.
___
Originally published on Dr Jonathan Cole’s page.
Subscribe to his podcast, The Political Animals, for more insights.
Photo by Mathias Reding.
Recent Articles:
23 September 2026
4 MINS
A renewed petition targets pro-life law professor Dr Joanna Howe, as she and husband James fight back against claims they say have damaged their careers and reputation.
23 September 2026
6.6 MINS
Government-funded research on boys, masculinity and the manosphere deserves rigorous scrutiny, especially when contested theories begin shaping education, regulation and public policy.
21 September 2026
4.4 MINS
On September 11, the Archbishop of Canterbury gave an interfaith award to a man who called Osama bin Laden the "Sword of God" and blames Jews and Christians for the war on Iran. The award was rescinded after public backlash.
21 September 2026
2.4 MINS
It is truly concerning that this sort of incursion into free speech can even be suggested. Labor's Digital Duty of Care Bill is about controlling the narrative online, and must be defeated.
18 September 2026
4.9 MINS
The government's $75 million deradicalisation program isn't working — and some wannabe terrorists have left more radical. So it's announced a new plan — which forbids identifying what's doing the radicalising.
18 September 2026
2.1 MINS
"Trans women are women." Repeat it enough and it starts to feel true. That's not an argument — it's a propaganda technique. And Australia's courts are now enforcing gender ideology.
17 September 2026
2.8 MINS
"A good mom if you strangle your kids — but lose custody for protecting your daughter from being castrated and mutilated by the gender lobby." That's Massachusetts today, where a Catholic couple lost their teenage girl for refusing to affirm her transgender identity.
