
New Book: Searching for God in Christianity
A few years ago, while I was serving as a denominational director, I organised the Awake Sydney Prayer Summit. This Summit brought together the combined leaders for Sydney’s protestant denominations, was attended by the then Premier Gladys Berejiklian, and was personally encouraged by the Prime Minister of the time, Malcolm Turnbull.
This day was memorable as it marked the only moment in modern history that all ten major Protestant denominations came together to pray, but something else from this time stands out to me. Before the summit, a few of the denominational youth and young adult directors met at the Salvation Army offices in Auburn to plan the event. A conversation that took place at this meeting lives ‘rent-free’ in my mind to this day.

Simply put, we all began discussing the overall decline of Christianity in Australia; in response to this, I remember remarking that around 1,500 churches were represented in the room, and that if we didn’t find a way to reverse the trend, no one else would. I specifically remember saying:
“No one else is coming; we are the current leaders of the Church in Sydney, and we needed to find a solution; the great leaders of the past that we love talking about are all in heaven; it is up to us to step up and lead.”
It was this impetus that sent me on a journey of searching for God’s power in Christianity.
I share this story to make the point that the Western Church is not living through a time marked by what scripture calls God’s ‘mighty strength’ (Eph. 1:19). Once this realisation takes hold, the key question that arises is: how do we instigate a time of ‘mighty power’ in Australian Christianity?
Lessons from the Past
To answer this, we can note that Reformed theology would generally agree that there have been three great theological movements in Church history. The first was the time of the Church Councils, which culminated in the writings of Augustine.
The second was the Reformation, instigated by the writings of Calvin and Luther. Lastly was the movement away from the theological liberalism of Schleiermacher that Barth, Brunner and Bonhoeffer drove around the time of World War I and World War II.
Each of these movements had two common traits. The first was a return to what Karl Barth called the most ‘exalted or profound word’ of the Church, which is: ‘that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself’ (2 Cor. 5:19). [1]
It was this reconciliation of God and man in Christ that drove Augustine away from Manichaeism to Christianity, resulting in his great work The City of God. Likewise, it was this same reconciliation that compelled Luther and Calvin to reform the Church of the 1500s. Finally, it was this truth that Barth, Brunner and Bonhoeffer reasserted after the liberal theologians had killed God.
The second common trait is seen in the final chapter of Augustine’s treatise on the Holy Spirit, and then used by Barth to culminate his mammoth work Church Dogmatics. But it is John Calvin who most clearly calls the Church to what he named invocational prayer. Calvin and Barth both called invocational prayer the ‘chief exercise of faith by which we daily receive God’s benefits”. [2]
Road to Renewal
It is surprising that all three theological movements described above did not instigate power via big doctrinal statements, but rather through prayer that invokes the reconciliation of 2 Cor. 5:19. It is this specific type of prayer, one which follows the instruction of Psalm 50:15 to call on God to actualise the reconciliation and resurrection of Christ, that Augustine, Calvin, and Barth employed to turn the tide in their generations.
The problem we have in our time is not a new one; it has been faced and overcome before in Church history. The leaders that drove change through the Church Councils, Reformation and during World War I and II have provided, and proven, a solution to the questions that open this article.
The great prayer warrior Campbell Morgan summarised this solution well when he reminded us to: ‘assert the strength of our Master’. Likewise, Martin Luther called us to remember that we are inherently weak in his preface to Romans and that the power of Christ is very real. What all this means is that the Church is called to pray and then preach. When we call to God and invoke His reconciliation, we will see resurrection.
___
[1] CD II/2, 88.
[2] Calvin, Institutes, Book 3, Argument. Barth, The Christian Life, p. 43.
___
This article is adapted from the newly released book by Sean A. Nolan, Searching for God in Christianity. © Sean A. Nolan.
Recent Articles:
26 June 2026
3.9 MINS
Christian expression and prayer has increased during the 2026 World Cup, that even secular commentators admit the fact, while scrambling for secular explanations.
26 June 2026
5 MINS
Identificational repentance is a very powerful corporate, priestly (1 Peter 2:9) prayer weapon, in which believers stand in the gap for their family, church, city, or nation by naming the sins that have shaped a people, confessing them before God, and turning from those patterns in heartfelt humility.
26 June 2026
3.8 MINS
Pauline Hanson’s critics would rather play dumb than debate multiculturalism's failures and her solution of monoculturalism.
26 June 2026
2.6 MINS
Nation First examines the interview that rattled the woke media class, and asks why a straightforward conversation with Tommy Robinson was enough to end Karl Stefanovic’s career at Nine.
25 June 2026
2.4 MINS
The Australian Christian Lobby is hosting screenings of the groundbreaking documentary Born Alive, Left to Die across Australia. It is time for truth, accountability, and change. Attend a screening and invite others to join you.
25 June 2026
3.9 MINS
Most Australians still believe in human dignity and inalienable rights, essential truths for a just legal system. What they’ve since abandoned is the only foundation that make those beliefs coherent.
25 June 2026
5.4 MINS
For three weeks, Women's Rights advocate Sall Grover tried to have an opinion piece published on the ABC. But the taxpayer-funded organisation refused, saying that terms such as ‘biological reality’ and ‘truth’ were offensive.





