Australia’s Largest Christian News Site

Since the Covid era hit in 2020, I have been exploring the whole subject of human health. Previously, I simply trusted the medical profession implicitly, believing that they always had the patient’s best interests at heart. I now understand that is not the case. This piece will explore just four aspects of an interconnected web of ideology, dogma, international espionage, and government overreach.

1. Is there such a thing as a contagious virus?

This is the pivotal question!

It has been more than two years since the onset of the “corona” crisis, which changed the trajectory of our world. The fundamental tenet of this crisis is that a deadly and novel “virus”, SARS-CoV-2, has spread around the world and negatively impacted large segments of humanity.

Central to this tenet is the accepted wisdom that viruses, defined as replicating, protein-coated pieces of genetic material, either DNA or RNA, exist as independent entities in the real world and are able to act as pathogens. That is, the so-called particle with the protein coating and genetic interior is commonly believed to infect living tissues and cells, replicate inside these living tissues, damage the tissues as it makes its way out, and, in doing so, is also believed to create disease and sometimes death in its host – the so-called viral theory of disease causation. The alleged virus particles are then said to be able to transmit to other hosts, causing disease in them as well…

Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology. (Settling the Virus Debate, 2022)

This paper, published by Drs Sam and Mark Bailey and 18 other signatories, challenged the virologists’ assumptions and proposed a two-step study to prove the existence of viruses. It is my understating that this has never been done.

In addition to Dr Sam’s work, her husband Dr Mark published a 29,000-word essay, A Farewell to Virology (2022), designed for the medical profession.

2. If viruses don’t exist, then what about the Wuhan lab leak and gain-of-function research?

It is hard to believe, but if viruses don’t exist, then the whole narrative about gain-of-function research is a fabrication designed to support the virus narrative — a circular argument.

I do believe that actual scientific research has been done at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. But it seems to me to be more likely that this research was working on the so-called vaccines, which actually have genetically modifying properties (Sam Bailey, 2022), and have an exceedingly high adverse events rate, including death (Dr John Campbell, 2023).

I have seen no evidence of a plume of infection emanating from Wuhan around the globe. Rather, we saw sporadic pockets of alleged infection springing up in random places with variable intensity.

If Wuhan was the epicentre of infection, I can’t believe that the Chinese would be given immunity (pardon the pun) from liability by the rest of the world.

3. Is the Polymerase Chain Reaction Test (PCR Test) fit for purpose?

The PCR Test was developed by Dr Kery Mullis (1944–2019), an American biochemist.

It tests for a piece of ‘genetic material’, but it has never claimed to have tested for the existence of a ‘virus’. In Kary’s own words, it is not suitable as a diagnostic tool, let alone a screening test. Asked about the alleged ‘misuse’ of the test, he said:

I don’t think you can misuse the PCR. The results, the interpretation of it, yes… With the PCR, if you do it well, you can find about anything in anybody… If you can amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do.

There are very few molecules, that you don’t have at least one of, in your body. So that can be thought of as a misuse. PCR does not tell you if you are sick, and it does not tell you that the thing you have ended up with was really going to hurt you. (Dr Kery Mullis)

Initially, it was only applied to people displaying ‘symptoms’, such as breathing difficulties, flu-like symptoms, loss of smell, or sore throat. Then, the protocol across the world changed. In August 2020, it was applied to whole populations.

If we assume that a virus causes a disease called Covid-19, then scientifically the test is not fit for purpose as the genetic material detected could have been picked up from anywhere, bearing no relation to any sickness experienced by the patient.

It seems to me to have been a money-making exercise coupled with a means of injecting fear (pardon the pun) into populations and justifying isolation strategies, and the like, imposed by governments (Sam Bailey 2021).

Dr Tom Cowan has explained how the PCR Test has been used in the Covid era. A sample of RNA is collected. This is presumed to be RNA from the alleged virus. This sample, though, is so small that nothing can be detected, so the PCR ‘amplifies’ the sample. This may be done, say 25 or 36 times. Now, there is sufficient RNA to be sampled and compared to the ‘so-called’ standard that has been published from a sample from Wuhan, China.

The point is that a match may or may not be found at 30 cycles, albeit generating positive and negative results. But, if the cycles are repeated often enough, say up to 40 times, more samples will give a positive result. The cycles can be repeated up to 60 times, by which time, everyone will be deemed positive!

So, all the ‘authorities’ need to do is wind up or wind down the cycles of amplification to generate the number of ‘cases’ they want to publish to the population. For example, they might wind down the number of amplifications to signify a drop in cases, in order to demonstrate the ‘success’ of the vaccine! (Spiro Skouras, 2023)

It seems to me that the PCR has been hijacked as the tool to ‘demonstrate’ the spread of the ‘disease’ when all it has done is measure the existence of some genetic material. It has not demonstrated the existence of a virus, as viruses have not been proven to exist.

4. Why has Allopathic Medicine superseded Natural Medicine?

Dr Ulric Williams (1890 – 1971) was a New Zealand surgeon who became a Naturopath. He said:

All disease comes from one of two places, either an unhealthy way of life… or else it comes from unhappiness in the mind and spirit. (Terrain Therapy, 2022)

Further:

I didn’t cure you, only God can heal. Actually, what I did, was to teach you how to cure yourself and that will be useful to you all your life.

And further:

Governments’ first concern should be – not to fight disease – but to inculcate health and fight the causes of disease. To which end they should enable, teach and encourage the people to live healthily.

Unfortunately, there seem to be too many vested interests in allopathic medicine, from Big Pharma to national and global governments with agendas that demand compliance, and an abdication of personal responsibility. (Jim Twelves, 2023)

Conclusion

These four questions are merely a sample of the madness. I think that modern medicine relies on a compliant, non-thinking populace. Let’s push back and not leave any stone unturned. If any of my four points have resonated with you, I would love to hear from you, in the comments below, or direct by email.

In the words of Dr Tom Cowan:

Words have power. Cult leaders use words to isolate you, shame you, bully you and confuse you with concepts. And inevitably to be part of the group, you have to stop thinking. So, people would rather give up thinking rather than be ostracised. For some people that’s like death. (Dr Tom Cowan, 2021)

That’s my point, I want to help someone start to think again! So please reach out or forward this link to anyone you think might be interested. Thank you.

References

• A Farewell to Virology (15 September 2022) – Dr Mark Bailey
• Bad Australian Vaccine Data (13 July 2023) – Dr John Campbell
• Breaking the Spell: the scientific evidence for ending the COVID delusion (August 2021) – Thomas S. Cowan, MD
• Finding What is Real in an Unreal World (24 August 2023) – Dr Jim Twelves
• PCR Test manipulation scam – Karry Mullins (2023) – Spiro Skouras
• Terrain Therapy: How to achieve perfect health through diet, living habits and divine thinking (2022) – Dr Ulric Williams
• Dr Tom Cowan: Pandemic of Not Thinking (23 November 2021) – Dr Sam Bailey

___

Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich.