Royal Commission

The Royal Commission Australians Deserve: This is Your Chance to Have a Say

11 January 2024

5.1 MINS

Become a co-signatory on the most comprehensive Covid-19 Royal Commission Terms of Reference document this country has seen.

When the Senate Select Committee on Covid handed down its final report in April 2022, several failures in Australia’s pandemic response were identified. In total, 19 recommendations were made including: ‘The Committee recommends that a Royal Commission be established to examine Australia’s response to the Covid pandemic to inform preparedness for future Covid waves and future pandemics.’

The Chair of the Committee, Senator Katy Gallagher, said a Royal Commission was required because the government’s response had led to more cases and more deaths, stating:

‘We think the government’s response has been characterise by a failure to be prepared, a failure to take responsibility, and then a failure to get it right.’

At the time, with an election on the horizon, Anthony Albanese gave support to the idea of a Royal Commission but stopped short of a full commitment suggesting that ‘some form of inquiry’ would be held stating ‘Labor had not settled on the best mechanism’. One might be tempted to think the then opposition leader was hedging his bets, knowing he might soon be in the ‘hot seat’ should Labor win the election.

Following his successful election in May 2022, it took a full 18 months – and relentless lobbying – for Prime Minister Albanese to make good on the promise and, it appears, ‘some form of inquiry’ is exactly what we’re getting. Gone is any mention of the Senate Committee’s recommendation to hold a Royal Commission. Instead, the Prime Minister’s proposed Covid Inquiry is shaping up to be what can only be described as the most watered-down version of pseudo-investigation in the nation’s history.

Headed by an ‘independent’ panel of vaccine, lockdown, and masking advocates, the ‘deep inquiry’ might struggle to plunge the depth of conspiratorial questions like: ‘Did mandating vaccines have a net positive or negative effect?’ and ‘What is the cause of the excess deaths which began in 2021 and persist through 2023?’ Fortunately, though not for us, that panel has been gifted carefully curated terms of reference which make clear that ‘actions taken by state and territory governments will not be in the scope of the inquiry’.

So, let’s not worry about the border closures, masking, lockdowns, and mandates, shall we?

Australia’s Covid Inquiry is fast heading down the path of the UK’s own ‘non-inquiry’ which is striding toward a set of pre-determined conclusions, so far failing to ask the hard and necessary questions. But, there is hope. In October 2023, the House of Review and ‘team sanity’ came to the rescue with Senator Malcolm Roberts successfully moving:

‘That, noting that a fully empowered Royal Commission with appropriate terms of reference is necessary to learn from the unprecedented government response to Covid, the following matter be referred to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee for inquiry and report by 31 March 2024.’ And also, ‘The appropriate terms of reference for a Covid Royal Commission that would allow all affected stakeholders to be heard.’

The Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee is currently receiving submissions for this inquiry and the call has been answered. Over the Christmas and New Year period, while many were taking time out, a collaborative work has continued around the clock to deliver the most comprehensive Covid Royal Commission Terms of Reference document this country has seen so far.

The document provides terms of reference to ensure the questions Australians deserve the answers to, are asked. Questions like what was the scientific basis for pandemic management decisions, laws, and policies including masking, lockdowns, and mandates; what were the cost-benefit analyses into the potential adverse impacts from border closures and lockdown measures; and what was the scientific basis upon which governments enforced mandates when they knew Covid vaccines neither prevented infection nor transmission?

The collaborators are individuals and organisations, professionals and academics, community groups, and everyday Australians. They cross multiple disciplines – including healthcare, law, economics, education, science, politics, and media. These are the real experts of Australia’s pandemic response, the mandated, the locked down, the jab injured, the silenced, and the separated; those who lived the consequences of every single policy decision that was decreed.

Compiled by legal team Julian Gillespie, Katie Ashby-Koppens, and Peter Fam, the 107-page document encompasses more than 50 terms of reference and calls over 80 expert witnesses. More than fourteen separate organisations representing hundreds of stakeholders have contributed to the document with the signatories’ list reading like a who’s who of Australia’s ‘truth-telling’ post-pandemic movement.

Contributors shared their views on why Australians deserve a Covid Royal Commission that asks the real questions:

‘In Australia, a Royal Commission is the only mechanism we have to investigate matters of great importance in a manner independent of Government. In our country, the people are right to expect the Executive to operate on a foundation of transparency and accountability.’

To this they add:

‘Covid saw historically unprecedented (and often unexplained) government restrictions on the rights and liberties of Australian citizens. There was widespread confusion and conflict. Holding a Royal Commission into the government response to Covid is essential to ensure not only that we actually learn from what occurred, but to maintain the integrity of and trust in Australia’s democratic structure.’

Peter Fam, Maat’s Method & Children’s Health Defense Australia:

‘A comprehensive examination, accountability measures, and the pursuit of justice are imperative to address the damage inflicted by our government’s handling of the Covid crisis. The initiation of a Senate committee investigation, aimed at defining suitable terms of reference for a Covid Royal Commission, marks the initial stride towards preventing Australians from ever experiencing again, what Professor Jay Bhattacharya has referred to as ‘the greatest public health mistake in human history’. It is crucial for the health and safety of all citizens that we scrutinise the reasons behind the imposition of unjustified and unscientific policies on Australians, devoid of a risk or cost/benefit analysis, causing untold harm, within a climate of stringent government-imposed censorship.’

Kara Thomas, Secretary, Australian Medical Professionals Society:

‘The 3 years of Covid saw Australian society turned upside down with unprecedented measures taken by governments, both State and National, far exceeding any previous measures taken even in wartime, with ‘lockdowns’,‘masking’, and enforced widespread ‘vaccinations’, for a virus that has been proven to have a low infection fatality rate and to be a significant risk only to the elderly and those with multiple co-morbidities. These measures were in direct opposition to Australia’s own pandemic policies published only in August 2019, and have resulted in severe economic, societal, and educational disruption with resultant developmental impairments in children, dramatically increased mental ill-health, alcohol abuse, suicides, and diseases consequential on the lifestyle changes and loss of medical services. It has to be asked why and how this happened and a Royal Commission is the way for this to be done with transparency and accountability, to ensure the mistakes can never be repeated.’

Professor Robyn Cosford, Chair, Children’s Health Defense Australia:

‘The average Australian doesn’t understand the sheer scale of the suffering that was caused by Australia’s pandemic response. Every day we hear from literally hundreds of Australians who were physically, financially, or psychologically devastated by the public health orders, and that’s still just the tip of the iceberg. A Pandemic Royal Commission will give these people an opportunity to be heard.

‘This collaborative to the Senate inquiry is arguably the most important document published in Australia in the post-pandemic era. As far as I’m aware, it’s the first time that all of our unaddressed questions have been compiled into a single document and served to our political representatives. We endorse it wholeheartedly.’

Joel Prior, Winston Smith Initiative:

‘The Covid Royal Commission Terms of Reference document is now live and its creators invite Australians to join the call for a Royal Commission by signing the document before it is presented to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee on January 12th, 2024.’

Republished with thanks to the Spectator Australia. Image courtesy of Unsplash.

SHARE >

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.

6 Comments

  1. Stephen Lewin 11 January 2024 at 10:33 am - Reply

    Well written Dr Julie …bring on the Royal Commission

  2. Cheryl Manley 11 January 2024 at 2:14 pm - Reply

    Thank you Dr Sladden and the rest of the team for your hard work and persistence. The corruption and tyranny orchestrated by our governments must be uncovered for all to see.

    • Jim Twelves 11 January 2024 at 5:17 pm - Reply

      Cheryl, thank you! I love your positivity.

  3. Stephen Lewin 12 January 2024 at 8:40 am - Reply

    just browsed through the terms of reference ..very very comprehensive …no where to hide ..for the truth to come out .. and expert witnesses are provided for every part of the over 40 terms of reference…thank you to all who constructed the terms

  4. Marilyn Johnson 12 January 2024 at 12:32 pm - Reply

    thankyou Julie for all your hard work and not giving up. Praying your perseverance continues to bring the truth to light

  5. Gail Petherick 20 February 2024 at 10:13 pm - Reply

    Thank you Dr Julie for highlighting the great need to have a Royal commission into the COVID era and mandate and to examine the statistics, the harm done through vaccines (whether injuries, death or social, business, mental health and other effects.)
    Thank you for pressing forth with the evidence gathered so far, along with colleagues and citizens, and for being courageous enough to challenge and examine the level of integrity of the Government policy during COVID.
    May there be a resultant examining of the COVID mandates, content (e.g. vaccines containing DNA changes, graphene oxide (a metal formerly used for building structures only and not used for humans), a vaccine dependence that lowers the immune system, and which can interfere with births and a baby’s DNA, plus examine quarantine and isolation measures (e.g. masks and methods of handling the crisis) and the side effects of the vaccines (minor, or severe injuries and excessive deaths), as well as assessing the damage to Australia’s social structure and well being.
    Thank you again for all you have undertaken to help promote a truthful inquiry into the effects of COVID vaccines and to contribute to the COVID Royal Commission

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles