Transgender Vilification Complaint Against Binary and Kirralie Smith is Dismissed
In a victory for commonsense, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal has declined to deal with a transgender vilification complaint against Kirralie Smith.
We have won another round of lawfare.
An application was made against Binary and me for vilification. It was first submitted to the anti-discrimination board which then referred it to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT).
During the hearing last November, the NSW Attorney General intervened to argue that NCAT was not capable of hearing the matter due to some of the arguments falling under federal jurisdiction.
A decision has finally been issued. You can read the entire judgment here.
Vilification Case Declined by the Tribunal
In a nutshell, these are the essential statements from the decision:
Decision: The Tribunal declines to deal with the application as it involves an exercise of federal jurisdiction.
- I am satisfied that the respondents genuinely raised the constitutional issue. I reject the applicant’s submission that an inference ought to be made that the respondents acted in an improper manner in raising the constitutional matters because it was late or because they failed to refer to Sunol in their submissions.
- As the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to determine these proceedings because they involve an exercise of federal jurisdiction, the application is declined.
- The Tribunal makes the following order:
The Tribunal declines to deal with the application as it involves an exercise of federal jurisdiction.
As an advocate for women and children and spokeswoman for Binary, I will continue to speak the truth.
No one can change their sex. Women’s sex-based rights are worth fighting for.
___
Republished with thanks to Binary.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
5 August 2026
6.9 MINS
Census night is less than a week away, and the religion question is more confusing than it should be. Here’s exactly how Christians — practising or not — should answer it, and why the ABS’s design deserves scrutiny.
5 August 2026
2.3 MINS
What happens when the side arguing 'the West shouldn't be suspicious of Islam' essentially tells their opponents: 'Be nice to us or the mob outside will get you'? An Oxford debate provides the answer.
5 August 2026
3.4 MINS
A new study finds people with multiple myeloma need more than medical treatment, urging doctors to address patients’ emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs alongside clinical care, in the face of impending death.
4 August 2026
5.2 MINS
How do you feel about listening to music that's been made totally through machine learning? Does it matter if you can't tell if it was made by a human or AI? Could the lyrics and emotion still resonate with you? Now, what about AI music made to worship God, or spread the Christian message — does it actually matter?
4 August 2026
9.1 MINS
Thirty Muslims living in the West have made their intentions crystal clear. They've announced their plans to dominate your country, replace your values, and transform your way of life — all on camera, in their own words. They're not hiding their Islamic agenda. The question is: When will we start believing them?
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Newly released emails and diary entries reignite debate over Anthony Fauci's pandemic leadership, exposing stark contrasts between his public statements and private assessments.
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Is the Murray-Darling Basin really drying out? Drawing on Bureau of Meteorology data, this article challenges official climate claims and questions the scientific basis for ongoing water buybacks.
Another win. Thank you Jesus and Kirralie and the Binary team.