
YouTube Called Out for Abortion Bias
“I’m so glad law enforcement is calling out YouTube for its obvious pro-abortion bias against pro-life videos,” said Ruth Institute president Dr Jennifer Roback Morse, PhD.
Sixteen Republican Attorneys General threatened legal action against YouTube and its parent company Google over their misleading “context” warnings.
“At the Ruth Institute, we’re no stranger to those blue boxes under our YouTube videos, giving ‘abortion health information,’” Morse said. “Since we often interview pro-life activists, we see those obnoxious boxes frequently.”

Misleading “Fact Checks”
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird sent a letter to Google stating that these warning labels spread false information that “minimizes and downplays some of the serious risks of abortion drugs.”
The letter gives an example from a pro-life video by Alliance Defending Freedom. The notice says surgical and chemical abortion are procedures “to end a pregnancy” done “by a licensed healthcare professional.”
“Obviously, this is false,” Morse said.
“Chemical abortions are performed, not by a doctor, but by the pregnant woman herself, often at home, alone, and with no idea what’s about to happen to her.”
“The same people who have scared us for years over ‘do-it-yourself home abortions’ with coat-hangars seem utterly indifferent to the suffering of women from ‘do-it-yourself home abortions’ with minimally regulated pharmaceuticals.”
Perpetuating Lies
The pro-life group Live Action has an entire website called, “I Saw My Baby”, where traumatised women share their horrific experiences. Roughly one in twenty-five of all women who take abortion pills wind up at their nearest emergency room, but, of course, Planned Parenthood doesn’t tell them that in advance.
“I came to that point — of physical danger, emotional anguish, psychological torment — because the doctors and medical professionals at Planned Parenthood lied to me.”
“She was never warned about the intense bleeding and pain of a chemical abortion but was instead told it was ‘as easy as taking a Tylenol’ — a typical pro-abortion lie,” Morse noted.
“For approving the ‘safety’ of the abortion pill, I hope these attorneys general will go after the FDA next. But in the meantime, I’m grateful for their intervention against YouTube and Google on behalf of these poor women.”
“At the very least, women deserve accurate information. These stupid ‘context’ boxes do nothing but muddy the informational waters,” Morse concluded.
___
Republished with thanks to The Ruth Institute. Image courtesy of Adobe.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
29 October 2026
2.7 MINS
If passed, the Digital Duty of Care Bill 2026 will almost certainly lead to censorship of Bible-based convictions about marriage, abortion, gender, Islam and more. Here's why it should be rejected and how to make a submission by 30 October.
29 October 2026
3.4 MINS
Professor of Law Dr Joanna Howe is taking her employer to the Federal Court after an alleged 11-month in-house investigation into her public pro-life advocacy.
29 October 2026
2.7 MINS
A Senate hearing on breastfeeding protections raises questions about sex discrimination law, induced lactation and why the Human Rights Commission paid a consultant to prepare its answers.
29 October 2026
4.6 MINS
Personal liberty cannot flourish without good manners and respect for others. Drawing on J.S. Mill and historic reformers, this piece explores freedom, peaceful protest and the common good.
29 October 2026
3.2 MINS
Liechtenstein’s Hereditary Prince Alois has blocked abortion law reform, defending unborn babies while championing practical support for pregnant women and families facing difficult circumstances.
28 October 2026
4 MINS
The assault on Helen Haines highlights Australia’s growing political hostility. Recovering civility requires personal accountability, respectful debate and a renewed commitment to Christian moral foundations.
28 October 2026
5.1 MINS
Germany’s proposed social media rules would give government-approved news outlets preferential visibility with social media algorithms, raising concerns about state influence over online information and the future of digital freedom.






Dear Dr Jennifer, thank you for this salutatory piece. I do not hold out much hope that YouTube will suddenly become unbiased but I am thrilled that you are calling this one out. The more we highlight their complicity in bias the more folks might be awakened to their tactics