
Time Magazine Represents Mainstream Media’s Fawning Adulation of Kamala Harris
It’s not journalism. It’s an in-kind donation to the Democratic Party.
It’s all about the vibe. And TikTok. And did I mention the vibe?
There. I saved you the trouble of reading Time Magazine’s 3000-word cover story on Democratic nominee Kamala Harris.
Kamala refused to be interviewed, but that didn’t stop Time from running a huge love letter dedicated to the woman they described as a cross between Beyonce and Obama. Seriously.

The fawning article praised Kamala Harris for having:
“ … pulled off the swiftest vibe shift in modern political history.”
Yeah, man. It’s crazy. She’s like, so fleek.
‘And did you know that the Democratic nominee has:
“ … dominated TikTok.”
I know. So cool. All the kids are scrolling.
The thing about Kamala Harris is that she is:
“ … offering a fresh message focused on the future over the past.”
Don’t ask me what that means beyond the fact that we don’t talk about her past, and that we have no idea what a future America might look like under Harris because she won’t talk to journalists.
But Time Magazine doesn’t need a sit-down interview with the woman who would become America’s first black President (or is it America’s first Asian President?) when they can simply quote her at length.
Like this:
“Our campaign is a fight for the future.”
Makes sense. Where can I get 100 ballot forms?
Surprise
The article, to be fair, does mention that many people thought Kamala Harris would never be up to it.
But we are quickly told that is because “geriatric” President Joe Biden gave her thankless tasks that he didn’t want to do. And it’s because people underestimated her.
Yep, they weren’t counting on her ability to post “viral memes” and “eye-roll at Republican ‘weirdos’.”
“Harris has already done what no Trump opponent has ever been able to do: snatch the spotlight away from him.”
With memes and eye-rolls and schoolyard name-calling.
I remember when Time Magazine was a serious publication. Actually, no, I don’t.
They quote a congressman who tells readers that Kamala Harris is:
“A Jedi Master.”
At this point, I must admit that I said to myself: “What am I even reading?!”
We are assured that Kamala Harris is no “overnight sensation”, as if she is a sensation.
And she must be.
“Celebrities like Charli XCX and Megan Thee Stallion came out in support of Harris.”
I don’t know about you, but I’m sold.
I take most of my political cues from rappers.
The Time Magazine journalists assure us:
“Now the moment is finally hers.”
Not convinced? A union leader (UAW’s Shawn Fain) called Kamala:
“A badass woman”
George Washington would be rolling in his grave.
Speaking of rolling in their graves, Time Magazine’s co-founders Henry Luce and Briton Hadden would be spinning. That their once-great magazine has been reduced to a TikTok reel on paper.
Solid
The article concludes, as you would expect, with sharp analysis from two political commentators you’ve never heard of and will likely never hear of again.
David Hogg, co-founder of a Gen Z political organisation, told Time:
“Elections come down to vibes, and Kamala has got the vibes right now.”
Yep. He certainly does head up a Gen Z organisation.
But the final word went to Leanne Weiner, a 39-year-old who caught the eye of Time’s intrepid reporters because she was wearing a “Childless Cat Ladies for Harris T-shirt as she waited in line for chicken fingers at the massive Philadelphia rally”.
Like you, dear reader, I could hardly wait to hear what insight the childless moggie lover could give on the vagaries of the US Presidential election.
“The whole vibe just shifted.”
Incredible.
By the way, just for comparison, when Time Magazine did a write-up on Donald Trump, the cover looked like this:

Do you think Time Magazine is campaigning for Harris?
Most of the mainstream media is. They’re not even pretending they aren’t at this point.
The article was essentially an in-kind contribution to the DNC.
I remember being so excited many years ago when someone gifted me a twelve-month subscription to Time. These days, I only read it so that you don’t have to.
You can thank me in the comments.
___
Republished with thanks to The James Macpherson Report.
Subscribe to his Substack here for daily witty commentary.
Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
4 August 2026
5.2 MINS
How do you feel about listening to music that's been made totally through machine learning? Does it matter if you can't tell if it was made by a human or AI? Could the lyrics and emotion still resonate with you? Now, what about AI music made to worship God, or spread the Christian message — does it actually matter?
4 August 2026
9.1 MINS
Thirty Muslims living in the West have made their intentions crystal clear. They've announced their plans to dominate your country, replace your values, and transform your way of life — all on camera, in their own words. They're not hiding their Islamic agenda. The question is: When will we start believing them?
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Newly released emails and diary entries reignite debate over Anthony Fauci's pandemic leadership, exposing stark contrasts between his public statements and private assessments.
4 August 2026
6.6 MINS
Is the Murray-Darling Basin really drying out? Drawing on Bureau of Meteorology data, this article challenges official climate claims and questions the scientific basis for ongoing water buybacks.
3 August 2026
4.5 MINS
A former witch looking for spiritual answers in all the wrong places, Christopher Wickland has driven off a cliff, been dead for 15 minutes, and encountered Jesus in the woods. The former occultist turned Pentecostal pastor now carries a burning conviction that England needs to reclaim its Christian identity — an he's not afraid to say so.
3 August 2026
7.9 MINS
Ceuta, Spain's enclave on Morocco's coast, faces unprecedented chaos as tens of thousands breach borders in what leaders are calling an invasion. The crisis exposes the catastrophic consequences of open-border policies across Europe.
3 August 2026
5.7 MINS
To understand Neo-Marxism, we first need to understand the realities of Marxism. Not the politically cleaned up propaganda version, but the brutal realities of the lives, and deaths, of those who lived and died under it.






Thanks :)
Did the magazine say she can also write? ( Check photo)
Thank you!