
Should Christians Be Ashamed of Joining a Political Party?
Last week, independent Adelaide news site InDaily ran a scare story entitled The Divine Right: Pentecostal recruitment drive divides SA Libs. Its apparent aim was to spook secular Australians about the increasing involvement of Christians in electoral politics.
“Senior Liberals are actively recruiting Pentecostals,” the article warned. “Adelaide Pentecostal parishioners have been told it is their ‘mission’ to join political parties so they can shape policy and preselections,” read another paragraph.
In its juiciest scoop, the piece paraphrased a state Liberal MP as encouraging Christians to ignore the “separation of church and state” and become more active in the political sphere. According to InDaily, “several MPs have raised concerns about the influx of Pentecostal branch members in recent months.”
At the centre of the story was Rob Norman, the Senior Pastor at Southland Church in Adelaide’s southern suburbs — and Liberal MP David Speirs, who is also South Australia’s Minister for Environment and Water.
At a recent Southland Church service which was livestreamed on Facebook, Pastor Rob gave a message entitled Christians and Politics. He also invited David Speirs, one of four Liberal MPs present that day, to share briefly about the stance he took against the Termination of Pregnancy Bill passed in South Australia earlier this year, and the importance of Christians having a voice on issues like the right to life.
Speirs was very upset with SA’s Upper House in particular. “They just wave legislation through,” Speirs told the congregation. “They’re not interested in undertaking deep analysis or challenging legislation that is presented to it… It’s such a laissez-faire, Left-leaning place — it’s extremely concerning.”
Pastor Rob offered his solution. “It’s really simple — if Christians joined political parties, many of these Bills would not even make it into parliament.” He explained that party membership gives people the right to vote at meetings and to have a say in the preselection of candidates.
Should secular Australians be concerned about Christians becoming more involved in politics? Or should Christians be ashamed of joining a political party?
The answer to both questions is of course a resounding no. Australia is a participatory democracy — the very point of which is to give everyday people a say in how the law that governs them is shaped, regardless of what they believe.
At the event in question, David Speirs was quoted as saying, “this idea of the separation of church and state — forget it”. But in context, he was not arguing for some kind of theocracy. Immediately after these words, as InDaily noted, Speirs went on to say,
If you’re going to use that as an excuse — and many churches do — not to get involved, and not to influence your members of parliament, we are on a sad and slippery slope to a very dangerous place.
In Australia, the separation of church and state was never about preventing religious people from expressing their political will. Quite the opposite: its purpose was to prevent the government from impinging on religious freedom.
Section 116 of Australia’s Constitution explains that “the Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion.” Australia’s founders wanted to ensure that the government didn’t favour one denomination over another: Australia was to be a country that Protestants and Catholics alike could call home.
Australia has become increasingly secular since its founding. But as always, Christians are not only permitted but encouraged to make their voices heard through their representatives — or to even become representatives themselves.
As Pastor Rob points out, in South Australia — a state with a population of 1.5 million people — the two major parties only have around 5,000 members each.
This provides an enormous opportunity for Christians to be involved in tangible ways that can ultimately steer the direction of our nation. Followers of Jesus should not allow a secular media to shame them out of exercising their democratic freedoms and obeying Jesus’ command to be salt and light in the surrounding culture.
Now more than ever, Australia’s political parties need Christian voices. Joining a party generally costs less than $100, but it is a powerful way to stand for truth and righteousness, for the benefit of all Australians.
Don’t be intimidated. On the contrary, let articles like InDaily’s inspire you to be more active than ever before.
[Photo by Aditya Joshi on Unsplash]One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
19 June 2026
3.7 MINS
Hon Maryka Groenewald asked the Cook Government to commit to protecting Christians’ right to express their faith freely. The Attorney General’s office dodged the question, instead pledging “balance” for WA’s “diverse” population.
19 June 2026
6.5 MINS
The West was repulsed by the Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi Regime against the Jews in WWII. Yet, it can find itself aligning with an underlying anti-Semitism that can be traced back to an error in an understanding Scripture first made by early Church leaders.
18 June 2026
3.6 MINS
History was made last night. Last night showed that the pro-life movement is capable not merely of resisting change, but of advancing its own positive vision for the protection of human life.
18 June 2026
2.5 MINS
Hanson accused Labor, the Liberals and the Greens of each refusing to “articulate the biological truth” about sex and gender, and named ACON as “the leading advocate of transgenderism in Australia”.
17 June 2026
3.1 MINS
Egypt’s June 15 “terrorism” trial of Said Mansour Rezk was adjourned until September 6. His Australian fiancée Sophie says “our prayers pulled through a miracle.”
16 June 2026
3.9 MINS
Recall Andrew Thorburn. He lost his job not because he did anything wrong, but because a new worldview has quietly captured Australia's public square. The Australian Christian Freedom Index shows just how far that capture has gone.
16 June 2026
6.3 MINS
It is not government’s role to adjudicate theological debates. Over a controversy over whether the label 'Christian' should be applied to the Mormon Church, the Pentagon passed this test with flying colours.






“In its juiciest scoop, the piece paraphrased a state Liberal MP…” Kurt Mahlburg
“this idea of the separation of church and state — forget it”…. David Speirs
So, NOT ‘paraphrased’ then? Or do you need to re-visit a dictionary Mr Mahlburg?