
Fertility Alone Doesn’t Make a Father
A critique of industrial-scale fatherhood, contrasting elite surrogacy and dynastic ambition with a biblical vision of present, faithful fatherhood that money, technology, and optimisation can never replace.
The Wall Street Journal recently reported on a Chinese video-gaming executive, Xu Bo, who has used commercial surrogacy to father more than 100 baby boys, at least a dozen of them born in the United States. Some of his arrangements have cost hundreds of thousands of dollars per child.
The whole story is rather dystopian. Xu’s stated aim is to build a family dynasty to one day take over his business, and he’s said on the record that he prefers sons, since he believes they’d be superior to daughters for such a purpose.
Reading about Xu Bo, I was reminded of Elon Musk, who enjoys a much higher profile in the Western world and has made no secret of the fact that he, too, has fathered a large number of children across multiple relationships, including through IVF and surrogacy.
Musk’s motives are arguably a little more noble. While Xu’s children are tied to his business dynasty, Musk seems more concerned by the global birth rate collapse, about which he has offered repeated warnings.
I share Musk’s concerns about the worldwide birth dearth. And in an age when many take a doom-and-gloom view of parenthood — and even of civilisation itself — there’s something very striking about men who affirm life, who want to build a family line and leave a legacy, and who have hope for the human project.
Even so, I’m certain their approach is not at all what God had in mind when He said, “Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28).
In fact, it’s a very poor reflection of what God intends for fatherhood — and how fatherhood functions best.
Stable Presence
Let me illustrate with a story.
We recently got home from a family holiday near the beach. It was a wonderful time. The only downside was that our almost-one-year-old son woke up every morning before the crack of dawn, allowing us — my wife especially — little hope of a much-needed holiday sleep-in.
On the final day, I decided to embrace the chaos. I got up early with my son, grabbed a coffee at one of my favourite cafes, and took him for a stroll on the beach as the sun emerged from the horizon. On one section of the path, we had to abandon the pram. I picked him up, and we climbed a flight of steps, from which I pointed out to him the waves, the rocks and the surfers below. He stared with fascination and delight.
This was a moment I’ll remember with my boy for a long time. And the truth is that I get to enjoy moments like this with him every day — and he benefits from them in immeasurable ways — because I’m present in his life.
The same cannot be said for the children of Xu Bo or Elon Musk. Occasional or scheduled moments, perhaps, but not the kind of ongoing, daily, reliable presence that children need to thrive.
The problem with Xu and Musk’s approach to fatherhood is that they apparently view it in the same way as their business ventures and entrepreneurial innovations — as an asset to manage, a system to optimise, a goal to achieve.
That’s not how fatherhood works, and it’s not how children work. Human nature is fundamentally fixed. Even in an economically streamlined or technologically advanced world, one thing children will always need is a present father. The studies are unanimous on this fact.
Real Family
The problem with industrial-scale surrogacy isn’t just that it treats pregnancy as a service or children as transactions. In the cases of Xu and Musk, particularly, it assumes children will be fine if they have access to all that money can buy.
But children are formed by the loving presence of their father and mother, not by optimisation. A child can have access to elite schools, exotic travel, luxury homes, private tutors and endless wealth, but they’ll be psychologically stunted — and therefore held back in every other sphere of life — if they’re deprived of a present and caring father.
It takes more to be a father than just starting a life, funding it, and moving on. Fathers shape children by staying — by being present in the ordinary, unglamorous ebb and flow of daily life. That presence is something that can never be outsourced to third-party providers. Nor should we want it to be. It’s the very crux of fatherhood.
Fertility, legacy and dynasty are all great aspirations. But civilisation won’t be renewed because powerful men produced large numbers of offspring. It will be renewed when ordinary fathers show up every day and give their children what no money or technology could ever replace: themselves.
That, in the end, is what our kids still need most.
___
Image courtesy of Unsplash.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
17 June 2026
2.4 MINS
Family First’s National Director Lyle Shelton described Sarah Game as “one of the strongest and most courageous advocates for families in any Australian parliament”.
17 June 2026
4.6 MINS
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters has refused demands to apologise, delete posts, or donate to a LGBT+ activist group, stating that they are “on the wrong side of history” in a viral post that has been viewed over 1.7 million times in less than one day.
17 June 2026
3.1 MINS
Egypt’s June 15 “terrorism” trial of Said Mansour Rezk was adjourned until September 6. His Australian fiancée Sophie says “our prayers pulled through a miracle.”
17 June 2026
4 MINS
Trump is calling it peace. Iran is calling it progress. History suggests it's neither.
17 June 2026
4.1 MINS
Nation First looks into One Nation’s powerful new video, the anger it has tapped into, and why Pauline Hanson’s rise is starting to look less like a protest and more like a political earthquake.
16 June 2026
4.5 MINS
Comedian Dave Hughes has unleashed on the Albanese Government, arguing there was no mandate for the recent tax changes and regretting voting for Labor at the last election.
16 June 2026
2.7 MINS
The South Australian Parliament is set to debate a private members bill that — if passed — will allow a biological man who identifies as a woman to record himself as the “mother” on the child’s birth certificate. It has already passed the Upper House with support from the Greens and Labor.






I believe that one very important point or fact is missed entirely when the subject of surrogacy is raised and also in abortion.
We’ll look at surrogacy first as its the topic here.
All parties see it as using another womb to have the baby made in then its theirs and thank you to the surrogate for helping. But its way more complex than people think.
When a baby is in the womb it’s DNA, some of it, crosses the placenta barrier and enters the mother. The mother now carries in her body the babies DNA. Half of the babies DNA comes from its father. That DNA is detectabley present for decades and probably for life. So, say Mother Julie says she will be a surrogate for her daughter and son in-law. She, the mother and surrogate will now not only have the DNA of the baby in her for good, a product if you will of her daughters egg and son inlaws sperm, and naturally her own daughters DNA, but now she will contain her son inlaws DNA in her body. Tell me that isn’t sickly wierd carrying around the product of your daughters egg and sons inlaws sperm!
How about the product of a best friends husbands sperm! It’s seriously twisted.
Now abortion. The mothers are told that or think that when they terminate the baby is gone, or as modern murder Drs might say the “pre baby” is gone. As we know though there is no such thing as a pre baby, life begins at conception with us, with God we are known before it though. So, the baby, pre baby to some, is gone. But is it? The DNA.
The female that has the abortion will carry that DNA with her for decades, possibly life. She will carry a part of the baby still. Its never gone and never will be. It became a part of her for good. Think of the implications of this mentally and ethically! It’s huge and something rarely if ever raised. The glaring and blinding fact that keeps getting overlooked by everyone who brings up the subject of abortion and surrogacy.
Keep this information in mind when you next find yourself in a discussion on either subject.
It seems the more we learn about embryology and the genetic symbiotic relationship between mother and child – regardless of whether she “wants” her offspring or not – the louder and more fiercely we witness the demands to kill the child in the womb and use taxpayers’ funds to pay for it. IVF, surrogacy. artificial contraception, abortion for all nine months of pregnancy … all this hatred and abuse. Then there are all the mutilations, neglect and corruption awaiting the child after birth. God help us. How can we possibly expect to survive as a nation, let alone live in peace and prosperity when we treat children like this?