
UTS Goes the Full Monty
While officials in Bali have been busy channelling their inner Turnbull in prosecuting sexual infidelity, the University of Technology Sydney has pursued the opposite goal. Its administration wants to make sure that its students are instructed in explicit sexual material, whether one consents to it or not.
The irony underlying this latest leftist scheme, is that under the guise of highlighting the importance of “consent” when one has sex, people are being exposed to sexual activity without consent. What’s more, UTS is not alone in pursuing this type of approach. Sydney University has adopted a similar strategy. But according to the UTS website:
I don’t know of anyone—not currently in prison—who thinks that sexual assault, let alone rape, is ever acceptable. But do we really need for something like this to be made compulsory? It’s socially progressive programs like this that border on the puritanical. Actually, that’s being unfair to the Puritans. For at least they never forced everyone in society to take a quiz before they could get their exam results.
Faculty and students that have already taken part in the training say that part of it involves viewing a house with 10 bedrooms. The online viewer—or should that be ‘voyeur’? — then has to click on each bedroom and either hear / read explicit details of the sexual activity in each bedroom. Unsurprisingly, seven of the ten examples involve same-sex couples. And all this time I thought the actual figure for homosexuality was the mythical 10%…
One concerned academic—who is also a Christian—showed their 18-year-old daughter who after watching a part of the presentation said:
This is misrepresenting young people as if we all take drugs, get drunk and go around having sex…
There was a time—not so long ago—when society was government by shared values and social mores regarding sexuality. In particular, if you weren’t married, then there was supposed to be no consent, at least, not culturally. This venerable tradition protected women in particular from being abused or taken advantage of.
But now it seems that in this age of anything goes, even with novel development of gay marriage, consent is as authoritarian as the radical gender theory that UTS also seeks to impose on its students.
Recent Articles:
18 August 2026
5.2 MINS
The Hon. Llew O'Brien introduced the Humans Rights (Children Born Alive Protection) Bill 2026 into the House of Representatives on Monday, 17 August 2026. Here is his powerful full speech, which outlines the need for this bill.
18 August 2026
6.3 MINS
Nation First reports on an Australian politician's bid to guarantee equal care for babies born alive after abortions, and the Liberal leadership’s chance to stop Parliament burying the issue again.
18 August 2026
3.2 MINS
As we seek to do good works, including the work to stop abortion, we must lay aside every hindrance, and run with endurance the race set before us, keeping our focus on Jesus.
17 August 2026
22.5 MINS
Contemplating Australia's census, researchers Mark McCrindle and Dorian von Freyhold join John Anderson to unpack how decades of changing question wording have quietly distorted the nation's religion data.
17 August 2026
3.1 MINS
Drone incursions over Australian air force bases have surged 635% in three years, yet soldiers are told only to close the blinds. Satirist James Macpherson skewers the government's response.
17 August 2026
14 MINS
Part 2 of a series arguing that Western societies exhibit hallmarks of a borderless "Global Neo-Marxism"—censorship, moral confusion, deindustrialisation, and eroding sovereignty—echoing patterns from Stalin's Soviet Union.
17 August 2026
3.4 MINS
Let’s be a Josiah generation, who, repenting for decades of tolerating abortion, finally make baby-killing candidates unelectable.






