rights

Why I Probably Won’t Use Your Pronouns: Third Person Rights

20 April 2023

2.2 MINS

Raising awareness for third-person rights.

When asked what pronouns I use, I say that I prefer to use “I, me, myself” pronouns. I am the first person, and as such, I speak using first-person pronouns. I would refer to myself in no other way. When speaking directly to me, it’s appropriate for you to refer to me with “you, your” pronouns. To me, you are the second person, and vice versa. If you’re talking about me and I’m not there, use the third-person pronouns which you believe describe me most accurately. Though I am a woman, I do not use the “she, her” pronouns. I am the first person. It would be strange for me to refer to myself as though I were the third person – I cannot have that relationship with myself. The one who uses “she, her” pronouns is you, and as such, the decision to use them is yours.

It’s strange to me that people would try to enforce third-person pronouns, assuming prematurely (and rather narcissistically) that I intend to speak of them to others. I don’t think I have any ownership over what others say about me behind my back. Why should I get to dictate what you say about me? If I had that power, I would demand that you speak of me only as “kind” and “intelligent”, despite whatever you might actually think. How would I monitor whether you followed through with my demand? Good question. I have no idea. I’m not even there. If I were there, we would no longer relate as third persons, but as second.

I think you should describe me as you see me. Describe me in accordance with your most honest interpretation of who I am. I have no desire for you to hide your true thoughts about me – especially when I’m not even there. Should I desire to identify as a man, and yet you still see me as a woman, speak of me as such. You are the third person – the third-person pronouns are yours to use. Pursue truth and speak how you will.

In more recent times, people have become very concerned with stripping away the freedoms of the third person. Of course, we want to be respectful – but if I see you as a moron, I will describe you as a moron, and if I see you as a man, I will describe you as a man. It’s my right as the third person to do so. I do not deny your existence by doing this – I merely interpret your existence according to my own worldview, and perhaps my worldview states that there is no meaningful distinction between sex and gender.

It may sound radical, but I find it more important to be inclusive of ideas in general, rather than a small subset of ideas focused on a contentious interpretation of gender. People should be allowed to express themselves and their beliefs without being impinged upon by others. I have my own beliefs about the world that I’m trying to express, and I ask that my self-expression be not impinged upon by some violation of my third human rights. When acting as the third person, I should not be forced to express the beliefs of the first person. I have no desire to propagate an agenda I do not agree with.

Third-person rights are under attack. Please do your part to raise awareness. *emotional sob*

___

Originally published at The Walk. Photo by Polina Kovaleva.

About the Author:

SHARE >

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.

2 Comments

  1. Kaylene Emery 20 April 2023 at 4:07 pm - Reply

    Thank you Trinity. I think the more we cooperate with such insanity, the more insanity they will demand. Someone somewhere once said these deep n wise words.
    Just say no.

  2. Anna Soh 21 April 2023 at 5:00 pm - Reply

    Well said as we only use the third person speech when the person concerned is not around so why should they have a right to control another person’s speech? How is that free speech?

    I pray that we deal with this as best we can without handing over our rights to someone else just because we are afraid or uncomfortable to go against the trend.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life

MOST POPULAR

ABOUT

The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.

MOST COMMENTS

GOOD NEWS

HALL OF FAME

BROWSE TOPICS

BROWSE GENRES