
Why I Probably Won’t Use Your Pronouns: Third Person Rights
Raising awareness for third-person rights.
When asked what pronouns I use, I say that I prefer to use “I, me, myself” pronouns. I am the first person, and as such, I speak using first-person pronouns. I would refer to myself in no other way. When speaking directly to me, it’s appropriate for you to refer to me with “you, your” pronouns. To me, you are the second person, and vice versa. If you’re talking about me and I’m not there, use the third-person pronouns which you believe describe me most accurately. Though I am a woman, I do not use the “she, her” pronouns. I am the first person. It would be strange for me to refer to myself as though I were the third person – I cannot have that relationship with myself. The one who uses “she, her” pronouns is you, and as such, the decision to use them is yours.
It’s strange to me that people would try to enforce third-person pronouns, assuming prematurely (and rather narcissistically) that I intend to speak of them to others. I don’t think I have any ownership over what others say about me behind my back. Why should I get to dictate what you say about me? If I had that power, I would demand that you speak of me only as “kind” and “intelligent”, despite whatever you might actually think. How would I monitor whether you followed through with my demand? Good question. I have no idea. I’m not even there. If I were there, we would no longer relate as third persons, but as second.
I think you should describe me as you see me. Describe me in accordance with your most honest interpretation of who I am. I have no desire for you to hide your true thoughts about me – especially when I’m not even there. Should I desire to identify as a man, and yet you still see me as a woman, speak of me as such. You are the third person – the third-person pronouns are yours to use. Pursue truth and speak how you will.
In more recent times, people have become very concerned with stripping away the freedoms of the third person. Of course, we want to be respectful – but if I see you as a moron, I will describe you as a moron, and if I see you as a man, I will describe you as a man. It’s my right as the third person to do so. I do not deny your existence by doing this – I merely interpret your existence according to my own worldview, and perhaps my worldview states that there is no meaningful distinction between sex and gender.
It may sound radical, but I find it more important to be inclusive of ideas in general, rather than a small subset of ideas focused on a contentious interpretation of gender. People should be allowed to express themselves and their beliefs without being impinged upon by others. I have my own beliefs about the world that I’m trying to express, and I ask that my self-expression be not impinged upon by some violation of my third human rights. When acting as the third person, I should not be forced to express the beliefs of the first person. I have no desire to propagate an agenda I do not agree with.
Third-person rights are under attack. Please do your part to raise awareness. *emotional sob*
___
Originally published at The Walk. Photo by Polina Kovaleva.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
3 November 2026
3.9 MINS
A $9.6 million taxpayer-funded child abuse prevention website is facing fierce backlash over advice accused of normalising paedophilic attractions, with calls for Labor to act.
3 November 2026
4.1 MINS
A Christian school's charity walkathon sparks outrage after children dress as people Jesus healed, raising questions about disability, dignity and what compassion really means.
3 November 2026
5.4 MINS
Europe’s historic cities face growing unrest, raising urgent questions about immigration, political leadership and the future of Western civilisation. Yet Christians must ultimately anchor their hope in Christ.
2 November 2026
1.6 MINS
If “love is love”, as we were told during the same-sex marriage campaign, then why would a paedophile's attraction towards children be any different? That’s where the Albanese Government has come to, and it’s pure evil.
2 November 2026
7.1 MINS
Too many conservative students, too many Christians, too many Australians are oppressed by the leftist monoculture on university campuses. I could have walked away quietly — but here's why I couldn't do that.
2 November 2026
6 MINS
Sometimes Christians ignore elections and who to vote for, because there are no perfect candidates. But this thinking is unrealistic. When we avoid voting for the lesser of two evils, it only helps elect the greater of two evils.
“Un-Australian”: NT Minister Condemns Darwin Council’s Ban on Christian Group from Christmas Pageant
30 October 2026
2.4 MINS
NT’s Attorney General Marie-Clare Boothby has labelled Darwin Council's decision “un-Australian”, “an outrage”, “completely unacceptable and against everything that Christmas stands for.”






Thank you Trinity. I think the more we cooperate with such insanity, the more insanity they will demand. Someone somewhere once said these deep n wise words.
Just say no.
Well said as we only use the third person speech when the person concerned is not around so why should they have a right to control another person’s speech? How is that free speech?
I pray that we deal with this as best we can without handing over our rights to someone else just because we are afraid or uncomfortable to go against the trend.