
Why I Probably Won’t Use Your Pronouns: Third Person Rights
Raising awareness for third-person rights.
When asked what pronouns I use, I say that I prefer to use “I, me, myself” pronouns. I am the first person, and as such, I speak using first-person pronouns. I would refer to myself in no other way. When speaking directly to me, it’s appropriate for you to refer to me with “you, your” pronouns. To me, you are the second person, and vice versa. If you’re talking about me and I’m not there, use the third-person pronouns which you believe describe me most accurately. Though I am a woman, I do not use the “she, her” pronouns. I am the first person. It would be strange for me to refer to myself as though I were the third person – I cannot have that relationship with myself. The one who uses “she, her” pronouns is you, and as such, the decision to use them is yours.
It’s strange to me that people would try to enforce third-person pronouns, assuming prematurely (and rather narcissistically) that I intend to speak of them to others. I don’t think I have any ownership over what others say about me behind my back. Why should I get to dictate what you say about me? If I had that power, I would demand that you speak of me only as “kind” and “intelligent”, despite whatever you might actually think. How would I monitor whether you followed through with my demand? Good question. I have no idea. I’m not even there. If I were there, we would no longer relate as third persons, but as second.
I think you should describe me as you see me. Describe me in accordance with your most honest interpretation of who I am. I have no desire for you to hide your true thoughts about me – especially when I’m not even there. Should I desire to identify as a man, and yet you still see me as a woman, speak of me as such. You are the third person – the third-person pronouns are yours to use. Pursue truth and speak how you will.
In more recent times, people have become very concerned with stripping away the freedoms of the third person. Of course, we want to be respectful – but if I see you as a moron, I will describe you as a moron, and if I see you as a man, I will describe you as a man. It’s my right as the third person to do so. I do not deny your existence by doing this – I merely interpret your existence according to my own worldview, and perhaps my worldview states that there is no meaningful distinction between sex and gender.
It may sound radical, but I find it more important to be inclusive of ideas in general, rather than a small subset of ideas focused on a contentious interpretation of gender. People should be allowed to express themselves and their beliefs without being impinged upon by others. I have my own beliefs about the world that I’m trying to express, and I ask that my self-expression be not impinged upon by some violation of my third human rights. When acting as the third person, I should not be forced to express the beliefs of the first person. I have no desire to propagate an agenda I do not agree with.
Third-person rights are under attack. Please do your part to raise awareness. *emotional sob*
___
Originally published at The Walk. Photo by Polina Kovaleva.
2 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
1 September 2026
3.3 MINS
Labor's new Digital Duty of Care promises to protect Australians online — but critics warn it's a rebranded censorship push that could silence political dissent, faith voices and the pro-life movement.
1 September 2026
2.3 MINS
Adam Bandt has found a new culprit for bird flu: climate change. But as scientists have linked everything from turbulence to potholes to global warming, is this just the latest stretch in an increasingly elastic explanation?
31 August 2026
3.9 MINS
Sydney sociologist Salvatore Babones argues Pauline Hanson was onto something — monoculturalism, not multiculturalism, is what actually helps immigrants assimilate and thrive, while Europe's approach has failed spectacularly.
31 August 2026
7.8 MINS
Tasmania's Parliament is moving to treat ordinary Christian parenting and pastoral care as a problem to be regulated, and in the Greens’ bill, as a crime.
31 August 2026
7.8 MINS
While evangelicals rally politically behind Israel, few schools teach why. The King's University builds Jewish studies, anti-supersessionist theology, and antisemitism scholarship into its academic core.
28 August 2026
1.4 MINS
When floods hit Nepal, killing dozens and leaving Australians missing, the Greens found their villain: Australian coal. A look at climate politics' newest ritual — the search for a sinner.
28 August 2026
3.5 MINS
Alice Springs' Greens-backed mayor had her car stolen — then refused to press charges. James Macpherson asks why the progressive answer to rising crime is to fix the narrative instead of the crime.






Thank you Trinity. I think the more we cooperate with such insanity, the more insanity they will demand. Someone somewhere once said these deep n wise words.
Just say no.
Well said as we only use the third person speech when the person concerned is not around so why should they have a right to control another person’s speech? How is that free speech?
I pray that we deal with this as best we can without handing over our rights to someone else just because we are afraid or uncomfortable to go against the trend.