Moderna Booster Caused Silent Heart Injury for 1 in 35 Recipients: Study

31 July 2023

2.4 MINS

Swiss researchers have discovered what no one is allowed to say out loud: the Moderna mRNA agent is far more dangerous than we were first told.

The Moderna mRNA ‘booster’ injection caused silent heart damage for 1 in 35 people who received it, according to an alarming new study by Swiss researchers.

The peer-reviewed paper was published in the highly reputable European Journal of Heart Failure last week and was conducted by industry-independent researchers.

The finding suggests that tens of millions of people globally have suffered heart damage they are yet to discover.

“Subclinical mRNA vaccine-associated myocardial injury is much more common than estimated based on passive surveillance,” the researchers concluded.

Blood Tests Reveal Hidden Heart Damage

The study was conducted at the University Hospital of Basel, one of Switzerland’s top medical centers, from December 2021 to February 2022. The 777 participants were hospital employees scheduled to receive a Moderna booster.

Participants were healthy with few pre-existing heart problems. Most were working-age adults: the group had a median age of 37.

Swiss doctors ran blood tests three days after recipients were injected with the Moderna mRNA agent. They found that 3 per cent or 1 in 35 of the participants had extremely high troponin levels, a standard indicator of heart injury.

Only two of the participants reported chest pain, and no serious adverse events were observed within 30 days following the dose.

The finding indicates that many more people have suffered heart damage from Moderna’s product than are currently aware.

Unlike the liver, the heart cannot regenerate dead muscle tissue, which means even minor cardiac injuries can cause problems years later.

A 2016 study confirmed a much higher risk of heart failure and death for people with no obvious heart problems but who experience rising levels of troponin.

Negligence from Australia’s Medical Regulator

Australia’s medical regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), assures Australians that myocarditis only occurs in 1 in 100,000 or 0.001 per cent of Moderna recipients.

If the new Swiss study is correct, over 31,000 Australians who received a Moderna booster may discover a hidden heart injury in the years ahead, according to available TGA statistics.

Approximately 1,100,000 Australians who received a booster injection opted for Moderna.

According to Australia’s international obligations, all Australians receiving a Moderna booster should be made aware of the Swiss data going forward. Australia is a signatory to the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, which states:

Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information.

The Swiss finding also raises serious ethical questions about the injection mandates Australian governments imposed on their citizens.

Among the many ethical codes ignored during the national “vaccination rollout” was the Australian Immunisation Handbook, which states that vaccines “must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”.

The Largest Study on Post-mRNA Heart Damage

Until now, most research into vaccine-caused heart damage has relied on “retrospective passive surveillance” data like VAERS — that is, patients or doctors reporting heart injuries after they occur.

By contrast, the new Swiss report was a “prospective active surveillance” study, where data was collected from the outset from healthy patients.

It was the third and largest study using blood tests shortly after vaccination to examine post-mRNA heart injury.

The first was a 2022 Thailand study conducted on teenagers which found that “cardiovascular manifestations were found in 29.24% of patients” who received a second dose of the Pfizer mRNA agent.

The second was a 2022 study in Israel that uncovered heart damage in 1 in 160 people who received a fourth dose of Pfizer.

The TGA is yet to update its advice on the mRNA products.

Image by Unsplash.

We need your help. The continued existence of the Daily Declaration depends on the generosity of readers like you. Donate now. The Daily Declaration is committed to keeping our site free of advertising so we can stay independent and continue to stand for the truth.

Fake news and censorship make the work of the Canberra Declaration and our Christian news site the Daily Declaration more important than ever. Take a stand for family, faith, freedom, life, and truth. Support us as we shine a light in the darkness. Donate now.


  1. Leonie Robson 31 July 2023 at 11:04 am - Reply

    Thankyou Kurt.
    We must keep bringing the tragedy of these injections and consequences to light while we are still able to do so.
    I note that Pfizer’s study of Myocarditis after boosters has been ‘delayed’ and is officially overdue for publication.

    • Kim Beazley 31 July 2023 at 3:28 pm - Reply

      “I note that Pfizer’s study of Myocarditis after boosters has been ‘delayed’ and is officially overdue for publication.”

      There are actually numerous independent trials available if you care to look. Here’s the latest published last week that I found in two minutes flat. In short, no real difference to the earlier vaccines.

  2. Kim Beazley 31 July 2023 at 11:29 am - Reply

    This is seriously misleading, and if I as a non-medical layperson can easily figure it out, then so should the author. It is merely another in a long line of failed attempts to make a case against the vaccines that simply doesn’t hold water.

    For example:

    “Australia’s medical regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), assures Australians that myocarditis only occurs in 1 in 100,000 or 0.001 per cent of Moderna recipients.

    If the new Swiss study is correct, over 31,000 Australians who received a Moderna booster may discover a hidden heart injury in the years ahead, according to available TGA statistics.”

    As the TGA advice is based on the fact that there is a literal mountain of data from billions of vaccinations in various parts of the world which shows with amazing consistency that the risk is as they state, then any study which finds such a wildly divergent outcome needs to be properly examined before running off and claiming it disproves the data. And especially one with such a small cohort of 777 people from the same occupation.

    If that had been the case here, the author would have found it very clearly in the study itself, right near the top of the page:

    “Hospital employees scheduled to undergo mRNA-1273 booster vaccination were assessed for mRNA-1273 vaccination-associated myocardial injury, defined as acute dynamic increase in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration above the sex-specific upper-limit of normal on day 3 (48-96h) after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause…Hs-cTnT-elevations were mild and only temporary. No patient had ECG-changes, and none developed major adverse cardiac events within 30 days.”

    But as this study at shows, all incidences of myocarditis involve cardiac troponin elevation, but not all incidences of cardiac troponin elevation result in myocarditis:

    “The mechanisms of cardiac troponin elevation are extremely numerous and not limited to ischemic necrosis of cardiac myocytes. Practitioners should be well aware of the underlying pathological and physiological conditions that can lead to elevated serum levels of cardiac troponins to avoid differential diagnostic errors, which will be greatly increased if clinicians rely on laboratory data alone.”

    So , as the Swiss study found “No patient had ECG-and none developed major adverse cardiac events within 30 days”, then the blunt fact is that there was no diagnosis of myocarditis, only of cardiac troponin elevation.

    In fact, further down they state unequivocally, “No definitive case of myocarditis was found”!

    But it’s when you see the same heart conditions are far more frequent and far more severe as a consequence of COVID-19 infection, leading even to death, that the futility of this attack on the vaccines can be seen.

    And when we’re currently fighting against proposed legislation which would allow the Federal Government to determine that information inconvenient to them can be judged to be “misinformation”, we should not be so eager to publish information that does misinform, as this truly does.

    And especially when that information might lead others to make a decision on their own wellbeing that may prove detrimental to their health.

  3. H Harrison 3 August 2023 at 4:42 pm - Reply

    There are evidences apart from selected statistics. People’s stories are real & they are human beings who deserve to be listened to; those who are alive that is! Thanks Kurt.

    • Kim Beazley 3 August 2023 at 4:54 pm - Reply

      “There are evidences apart from selected statistics.”

      So, you accept this incredibly limited study of less than 800 people as evidence, even though it’s only offering you statistics. But data from around the world involving millions you dismiss as “selected statistics”. And you can’t see the absurdity in that.

      While it’s true that “People’s stories are real & they are human beings who deserve to be listened to”, especially those extremely rare individuals who have suffered adverse effects from the vaccines. But surely those far more numerous individuals who have suffered, and many who continue to suffer, from the infection, some permanently damaged and even fatally, also “deserve to be listened to”. And they’re hundreds of times more numerous and many times more seriously affected.

      And it’s misleading studies like this which only serve to mute the latter.

    • Flower of Scotland 27 August 2023 at 12:43 pm - Reply

      H Harrison, absolutely correct. You are on the ball with your comments. I know my life has been turned upside down with family here in Perth WA injured, and back home in Glasgow, Scotland. The real stories of those affected stand up against any “study or stats” we can no longer trust “the Science “(which is a trade mark) We have a relationship with the living GOD, through Jesus Christ, our Saviour. I no longer trust “the science” even with science degree sitting above me as I type this message. I trust in GOD alone, He has not given me a spirit of Fear, but of Power and Love, and of a Sound Mind. I lost the respect of many of my colleagues when I stood up against the jab mandates, I lost my job, I lost friends, I left the church , but I have JESUS, I have my faith, my health, and my family. That’s all I need.

  4. Kim Beazley 4 August 2023 at 9:45 am - Reply

    Here is a direct response to the John Campbell video, which proves his deliberate misleading of his viewers.

  5. Stephen Lewin 9 August 2023 at 8:04 am - Reply

    Thank you Kurt data revealung truth is important

  6. Flower of Scotland 27 August 2023 at 12:27 pm - Reply

    Thanks Kurt, I had some bad experiences working in the covid clinic here in Perth, witnessed young males experiencing “cardiac issues” My nephew was 16 years old, when he ended up with pericarditis, then developed myocarditis. Never had covid prior to his jabs, developed Pericarditis after the first shot, “caught covid” 20 days post jab. Ended up in ED several times over the weeks and months, post two jabs, to monitor his heart arrhythmia’s. The doctor I worked with in the clinic stated the jab had a “bit of a kick in young males” her words, not mine. The fact that so many people ” caught covid” post jab throws out the big claim by so many that ” covid infection” caused all these deaths. Again, thanks Kurt for sharing this insightful information with the world. Bless you, brother.

    • Kim Beazley 28 August 2023 at 9:08 am - Reply

      You’re either not telling the truth, or your clinic was the unluckiest place in the world!

      As this peer reviewed study at shows:

      “…the risk of myocarditis is more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine. ”

      And as the American Heart Association reports at

      “In a detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people, the risk of myocarditis in unvaccinated individuals after COVID-19 infection was at least 11 times higher compared to people who developed myocarditis after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine or booster dose…”

      And as this study in the Medical Journal of Australia at shows:

      “COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated myocarditis has a mild, self-resolving clinical course…All patients improved after treatment with high dose ibuprofen for one week or until symptom resolution and proton pump inhibitor therapy. Median hospital stay was 2.3 days.”

      And as there is an absolute mountain of data from hundreds of studies around the world, just like every other adverse effect of the vaccine, as a symptom of COVID it is not only far more frequent, but far more serious, leading to long term consequences, and even in some cases death from heart failure due to heart damage caused by the virus.

Leave A Comment

Recent Articles:

Use your voice today to protect

Faith · Family · Freedom · Life



The Daily Declaration is an Australian Christian news site dedicated to providing a voice for Christian values in the public square. Our vision is to see the revitalisation of our Judeo-Christian values for the common good. We are non-profit, independent, crowdfunded, and provide Christian news for a growing audience across Australia, Asia, and the South Pacific. The opinions of our contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of The Daily Declaration. Read More.