
Obama Officials Leaked Fake ‘Russiagate’ Intel to Frame Trump, Bombshell Docs Reveal
Obama officials fabricated and leaked intel in 2016 to claim that Russia helped get Trump elected, triggering years of investigations, according to a trove of documents released last Friday.
Obama officials leaked false intelligence to the press and fabricated reports claiming Russia helped Donald Trump win the 2016 presidential election — even though US spy agencies had concluded the opposite — according to bombshell documents released last Friday.
The document dump, authorised by incoming Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, revealed that in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, US intelligence had consistently assessed that Russia was “probably not trying… to influence the election by using cyber means.”
Talking points were also prepared for Gabbard’s predecessor, James Clapper, who stated, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”
However, Clapper — who served as President Barack Obama’s spy chief — never delivered those December 7 talking points to the American public. Instead, two days later, Obama gathered his top National Security Council chiefs — including Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Andrew McCabe and others — to discuss Russia.
Following that meeting, Clapper’s executive assistant sent an email to leaders of the US intelligence community ordering them to create a new assessment “per the President’s request” detailing “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election”.
Obama officials then leaked false statements to media outlets — beginning with The Washington Post — claiming that “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election”.
“Nobody ever said ‘the Russians hacked the election!'”
Except, of course, they ALL said “the Russians hacked the election” 👇 pic.twitter.com/w50F9lQN9i
— L A R R Y (@LarryOConnor) July 22, 2025
The leaks appear to have been part of a broader effort to cast doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s presidency by seeding public suspicion that the 2016 election outcome had been manipulated by foreign powers — a false narrative that came to be known as “Russiagate“.
.@DNIGabbard on the Russia collusion hoax: “The effect of what Pres. Obama and his senior national security team did was subvert the will of the American people, undermining our democratic republic, and enacting what would be essentially a years-long coup against Pres. Trump.” pic.twitter.com/29kviGOAdE
— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 20, 2025
Obama Officials Fabricated Intel: Gabbard
A month after the leaks were issued, Clapper’s office released a new Intelligence Community Report that assessed with “high confidence” that “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016” with the aim to “undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency”.
“Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump,” the assessment also claimed.
That report “directly contradicted the [intelligence community] assessments that were made throughout the previous six months,” according to a press release from DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard.
Gabbard added that her months-long probe into the Obama-era documents “reveal this new assessment was based on information that was known by those involved to be manufactured” — including the long-discredited Steele Dossier.
“This was politicised intelligence that was used as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimise President Trump’s victory, the years-long Mueller investigation, two Congressional impeachments, high level officials being investigated, arrested, and thrown in jail, heightened US-Russia tensions, and more,” Gabbard further noted.
By exploiting classified processes and media leaks, Obama and his officials were able to shape the emerging narrative from behind the scenes and legitimise the launch of further investigations — all while concealing the weak evidentiary basis of their claims and distance themselves from any fallout.
Investigations related to the Trump-Russia collusion claims are estimated to have cost American taxpayers around US$50 million.
🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the… pic.twitter.com/UQKKZ5c4Op
— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 18, 2025
Criminal Referral Received by Justice Department
In publishing her Friday press release, DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard explained, “The issue I am raising is not a partisan issue. It is one that concerns every American.” She continued:
The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.
“No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again,” Director Gabbard said, adding, “We are turning over all documents to the DOJ for criminal referral.”
Major outlets like Fox News, Politico and The Economic Times reached out to former President Barack Obama and the other officials implicated in the document dump, but none have issued public comments addressing the claims.
The US Department of Justice has since confirmed that it has received Gabbard’s criminal referral concerning the revelations.
___
3 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
25 September 2026
3.1 MINS
Australian and New Zealand mounted troops continued their Holy Land campaign beyond Beersheba, culminating in the fierce battle at Semakh and the defeat of Ottoman forces by the Australian Lighthorse and the New Zealand Mounted Rifles.
25 September 2026
6.7 MINS
Monica Smit celebrates the abolition of Victoria’s Group Voting Ticket system while setting her sights on mandatory voting, sparking a fresh debate over electoral reform.
25 September 2026
3.5 MINS
Labor and the Greens voted down a motion by Moira Deeming MP that would have banned children from being present during in-person commercial sex work, including in private homes.
25 September 2026
2.9 MINS
Samuel Adrián’s arrest in Colombia has intensified a growing debate over freedom of expression, transgender ideology, and the protection of children.
24 September 2026
3 MINS
The US warns that Labor’s Digital Duty of Care bill could see platforms suppress independent journalists and commentary on “sensitive or controversial topics”, and would encourage platforms to engage in “pre-emptive censorship to avoid the risk of liability”.
24 September 2026
3.6 MINS
All Blacks and Springboks players united in prayer after their Baltimore clash, while Christian captain Siya Kolisi and Ardie Savea continue to testify openly about Jesus.
24 September 2026
4.8 MINS
The Digital Duty of Care Bill claims to be about safety. But the actual wording allows the Minister for Communications to decide what "harm" means, and a senator has already confirmed who that power is really meant to silence.






Thanks Kurt….. “For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, nor hidden that will not be known”.
Luke 12:2.
Let it be known and the feathers fly!
Amen Ian!
Thank you for this very important exposure of a false report stating that Russia helped Trump to be elected.
The reseach completed by the DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard was so impresive and obviously she and her group wanted to find out the facts and be able to clarify if the election results wre in soem way interferred with .
It would be so good too, if Australia could have thorough investigations like this,as we don’t seem to have the degree of rigor and quest for accountablity in our electoral process. It would be so helpful to have a similar process and to have more scrutiny (eg many new immigrants or refugees were suddenly given Australian citizenship -who lived in the Sydney areas, who were expected to vote for a main party. Uncannily, this was all rushed through just before our Federal election. Plus, when there was an earlier federal election, reports revealed some who voted were not eligible yet ASIC did not bring in penalties or act on this knowledge.