
Variety’s Latest Honour Proves Categories Are Real… Until They’re Inconvenient
Variety Magazine has announced the recipient of their 2026 Women of Power award.
And the award goes to…
You think you already know the punchline, don’t you?
These days, the winner of a women’s award is likely to go to… someone not a woman. It’s all so predictable.
But Variety Magazine has seen fit to add a twist this year.
Outside the Binary Box
They’ve given their Women of Power award to actress Emma Corrin… a woman… who says she’s not a woman. Or a man.
She enthusiastically accepted the award, telling those gathered:
I’m doubly honoured to be here tonight as the first non-binary recipient of the award. I think it’s crucial now more than ever that no matter how we identify, we are able to come together and support each other.
Actor Person Emma Corrin insists on being called they/them rather than she/her because they is non-binary.
So we are, apparently, dealing with a woman who is not a woman, receiving an award for women, in celebration of a category she does not belong to, but is also honoured to represent.
It makes perfect sense if you say it while standing on your head. Or if you’re the Australian Sex Discrimination Commissioner. But I repeat myself.
Confusing Contortions
Here’s what I find so difficult to understand…
If you or I use the wrong pronouns in relation to a gender diverse person, it’s tantamount to committing a genocide.
And yet, if that same person decides that, for the purposes of a trophy ceremony, a red carpet, and much-needed publicity for an upcoming film, they are perfectly comfortable stepping temporarily into the category of “woman” in order to accept a Women’s award, then suddenly we are expected to be nothing but gracious, celebratory, and inclusive.
No contradiction is acknowledged. No irony is permitted. Just a gentle injunction that we all “come together and support each other.”
Which is, of course, the modern moral ecosystem in miniature: the rules are absolute, unless you need a loophole; the categories are sacred, unless they are inconvenient; and consistency is not so much a virtue as a kind of microaggression.
And so we are left with a world in which language is treated as both dangerously rigid and infinitely elastic, depending entirely on who is speaking, what they are receiving, and which direction the applause is coming from.
___
Republished with thanks to The James Macpherson Report. Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
2 November 2026
1.6 MINS
If “love is love”, as we were told during the same-sex marriage campaign, then why would a paedophile's attraction towards children be any different? That’s where the Albanese Government has come to, and it’s pure evil.
2 November 2026
7.1 MINS
Too many conservative students, too many Christians, too many Australians are oppressed by the leftist monoculture on university campuses. I could have walked away quietly — but here's why I couldn't do that.
2 November 2026
6 MINS
Sometimes Christians ignore elections and who to vote for, because there are no perfect candidates. But this thinking is unrealistic. When we avoid voting for the lesser of two evils, it only helps elect the greater of two evils.
2 November 2026
5.4 MINS
An Aboriginal elder in Western Australia has called for abused children to be taken away from “bad parents”, asking why responses of neglect and abuse of children differ across Australia. There is no place for a “hands-off culture” when children’s lives are at stake.
“Un-Australian”: NT Minister Condemns Darwin Council’s Ban on Christian Group from Christmas Pageant
30 October 2026
2.4 MINS
NT’s Attorney General Marie-Clare Boothby has labelled Darwin Council's decision “un-Australian”, “an outrage”, “completely unacceptable and against everything that Christmas stands for.”
30 October 2026
4.5 MINS
A Tasmanian Christian reflects on 42 years of faith, warning that proposed conversion practices laws could threaten prayer, parenting and religious freedom, while reaffirming his hope in Christ.
29 October 2026
2.7 MINS
If passed, the Digital Duty of Care Bill 2026 will almost certainly lead to censorship of Bible-based convictions about marriage, abortion, gender, Islam and more. Here's why it should be rejected and how to make a submission by 30 October.






Brilliantly observed James.