
Variety’s Latest Honour Proves Categories Are Real… Until They’re Inconvenient
Variety Magazine has announced the recipient of their 2026 Women of Power award.
And the award goes to…
You think you already know the punchline, don’t you?
These days, the winner of a women’s award is likely to go to… someone not a woman. It’s all so predictable.
But Variety Magazine has seen fit to add a twist this year.
Outside the Binary Box
They’ve given their Women of Power award to actress Emma Corrin… a woman… who says she’s not a woman. Or a man.
She enthusiastically accepted the award, telling those gathered:
I’m doubly honoured to be here tonight as the first non-binary recipient of the award. I think it’s crucial now more than ever that no matter how we identify, we are able to come together and support each other.
Actor Person Emma Corrin insists on being called they/them rather than she/her because they is non-binary.
So we are, apparently, dealing with a woman who is not a woman, receiving an award for women, in celebration of a category she does not belong to, but is also honoured to represent.
It makes perfect sense if you say it while standing on your head. Or if you’re the Australian Sex Discrimination Commissioner. But I repeat myself.
Confusing Contortions
Here’s what I find so difficult to understand…
If you or I use the wrong pronouns in relation to a gender diverse person, it’s tantamount to committing a genocide.
And yet, if that same person decides that, for the purposes of a trophy ceremony, a red carpet, and much-needed publicity for an upcoming film, they are perfectly comfortable stepping temporarily into the category of “woman” in order to accept a Women’s award, then suddenly we are expected to be nothing but gracious, celebratory, and inclusive.
No contradiction is acknowledged. No irony is permitted. Just a gentle injunction that we all “come together and support each other.”
Which is, of course, the modern moral ecosystem in miniature: the rules are absolute, unless you need a loophole; the categories are sacred, unless they are inconvenient; and consistency is not so much a virtue as a kind of microaggression.
And so we are left with a world in which language is treated as both dangerously rigid and infinitely elastic, depending entirely on who is speaking, what they are receiving, and which direction the applause is coming from.
___
Republished with thanks to The James Macpherson Report. Images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
One Comment
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
31 August 2026
3.9 MINS
Sydney sociologist Salvatore Babones argues Pauline Hanson was onto something — monoculturalism, not multiculturalism, is what actually helps immigrants assimilate and thrive, while Europe's approach has failed spectacularly.
31 August 2026
7.8 MINS
Tasmania's Parliament is moving to treat ordinary Christian parenting and pastoral care as a problem to be regulated, and in the Greens’ bill, as a crime.
31 August 2026
7.8 MINS
While evangelicals rally politically behind Israel, few schools teach why. The King's University builds Jewish studies, anti-supersessionist theology, and antisemitism scholarship into its academic core.
28 August 2026
1.4 MINS
When floods hit Nepal, killing dozens and leaving Australians missing, the Greens found their villain: Australian coal. A look at climate politics' newest ritual — the search for a sinner.
28 August 2026
3.5 MINS
Alice Springs' Greens-backed mayor had her car stolen — then refused to press charges. James Macpherson asks why the progressive answer to rising crime is to fix the narrative instead of the crime.
28 August 2026
2.8 MINS
A veteran Seattle Times sports columnist resigned after editors blocked his column defending Sophie Cunningham's stance on transgender athletes in women's sports, calling it a matter of journalistic integrity.
28 August 2026
2.6 MINS
Thomas Aquinas questioned Muhammad’s credentials to speak for God. His question remains uncomfortably relevant.






Brilliantly observed James.