
Teens Bypassing Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban, Peer-Reviewed Study Finds
Teenagers are bypassing Australia’s social media age ban through fake accounts, borrowed logins and private browsers, according to new research from the University of Newcastle.
More than 85 per cent of Australian adolescents under 16 continued using the social media platforms targeted by the country’s world-first age ban during the first three months after it took effect, a peer-reviewed study published in the British Medical Journal has found.
The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Newcastle and published last Wednesday, assessed the initial impact of the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024 on 408 adolescents aged 12 to under 17. It found “insufficient evidence” that the law produced any substantive reduction in social media use among those it was designed to restrict.
“Despite the intent of the Social Media Minimum Age Act 2024 to delay access to social media platforms and reduce the potential for online harms, little evidence was found of immediate substantive reductions in reported social media use by adolescents under 16 years,” the authors wrote.
The Act, which came into force in December 2025, requires platforms including TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat to take “reasonable steps” to prevent under-16s from creating or maintaining accounts. Corporations that fail to comply face civil fines of up to A$49.5 million.
The Australian eSafety Commissioner’s own compliance update, cited in the study, found that as many as seven in ten children retained social media accounts three months after the law took effect.
Age Checks and Workarounds
Among under-16 participants who reported using restricted platforms at three-month follow-up, only 39 per cent or fewer reported encountering any age verification measure across those platforms. The most common method platforms deployed was self-declared age — where users simply type in a birth date — reported by 24 to 39 per cent of participants. Uploading a “selfie” was required by some platforms, reported by 13 to 27 per cent.
Where platforms did deploy age checks, teenagers found ways around them. Among under-16 participants, 9 to 29 per cent reported accessing restricted platforms using someone else’s account. Between 15 and 19 per cent created fake accounts with false age details. A further 6 to 11 per cent accessed platforms via private browsers.
The researchers noted that adolescents “may be highly motivated to circumvent age-based restrictions” given that social media serves core social functions such as peer interaction and identity formation, and that platforms are designed to reinforce habitual use.
The age verification methods now being used by platforms — including selfie uploads and requests for photo identification — have raised concerns among digital rights advocates about the collection and storage of biometric data from minors. Critics of the legislation who have previously argued for its repeal warned before implementation that age-gating would require surveillance infrastructure at odds with children’s privacy.
Longer-Term Assessment Needed
The researchers said that more data was needed before fully assessing the ban’s effectiveness. “The full impacts of the Act may not be evident for a decade,” they wrote, adding that any potential benefits would be more likely among younger children not yet heavily exposed to social media than among current adolescents for whom use is already established.
The study’s authors called for interventions “that tackle a broader range of drivers of harmful social media use” in ways that align with the social and digital realities of young people.
The study’s descriptive findings also suggested some adolescents shifted their online activity rather than reducing it. More participants reported spending increased time on messaging apps such as WhatsApp after the Act took effect than reported spending less time on them. The authors said longer-term research was needed to assess whether the legislation was displacing online activity rather than reducing it.
The eSafety Commissioner plans to continue investigating platforms’ adherence to the Act. A 12-month follow-up study of the same cohort is planned for December 2026.
___
Image via Adobe.
6 Comments
Leave A Comment
Recent Articles:
20 July 2026
19.6 MINS
Rubio told delegates that far-left terrorism, long dismissed as a “partisan fiction”, has escalated into assassinations and coordinated attacks across the globe, and that the ideology behind the violence is a “poisonous resentment”, aimed at destroying what greater men have built.
20 July 2026
22.1 MINS
Europe now requires new cars to implement surveillance technology to monitor drivers' eyes and faces in real time. Australian standards, regulators say, will align with international norms wherever possible. Senator Alex Antic says it is time to ask who is actually making the rules that govern Australian lives.
20 July 2026
5.9 MINS
The United States' election system is "so broken and so vulnerable that no one can possibly defend it" — so said President Trump Thursday night, as he released declassified intelligence alleging Chinese interference, ballot fraud, and a years-long cover-up by intelligence agencies.
20 July 2026
3.5 MINS
Some Liberals have come up with a way to improve their electoral fortunes: Gender quotas. That’s right, they’re proposing to ease up on the whole meritocracy thing in order to make room for some good old-fashioned DEI.
20 July 2026
3 MINS
It’s been said women have relationships face to face while men have relationships shoulder to shoulder. As a husband, father of five daughters, and CEO whose work is encouraging men to be the best they can be, I couldn’t agree more.
17 July 2026
15.2 MINS
The Church is wimpy, and it's destroying the nation. That's the blunt assessment of Rev. Chris Wickland, a UK clergyman who refuses to soften the gospel for perceived cultural acceptance. And he has a point. From the rise of "woke" institutional Christianity to the abdication of prophetic witness, the modern Church has traded its backbone for a desperate attempt to attain a disappearing seat at the table.
17 July 2026
4.5 MINS
Landlords have shut the door on the LGBTQ+ desecration of a former Sydney Catholic Church and theatre named after saints.






The act is not and was never intended to police children’s online activity. It is designed to police everyone’s internet activity. As such it is an infringement of our rights. I can’t press like, speak freely on any substack anywhere in the entire world without first identifying myself to the “esafety commissioner” here in Australia.
I’m only 76 you know and the govt will know that too, but it is what I’m looking at and commenting on that They want to know for their safety, not mine.
James… YES !! It’s part of creeping marxism and islamism.
I wrote on the today… https://dailydeclaration.org.au/2026/06/29/four-steps-crush-christianity/
Great article Kurt!
Kurt, fascinating! I am not surprised at all by the research findings, anyone thinking would have expected this. So lets consider what is being conducted here. The government want to be seen as progressive and keen to protect our children. Whether they do or not is not the issue, its being ‘seen’ to be doing the ‘right thing’.
The situation is like the action of closing the gate after the horse has bolted! A pointless exercise.
My own view is that parents are the ones charged with the ‘responsibility’ to protect their young. It is bred into us, we see it in the animal kingdom as well with many species, but not all. When the government steps in the main effect of their action is to further dis-empower parents and make their relationship with their children even more tenuous.
Lets fight back and reach out to our children and seek to save ‘some’ of them, as we mold them into tomorrows leaders.
From a IT Professional background, which includes significant work in security I make the following comments:
– The law, as framed, is more about control/tracking of adults, rather than children
– The current state of social media sites, technologically), is such that EVERY age check is EASILY overcome by a 12 year old
– Relying on this policy abrogates parental responsibility and authority; it is part of the marxist agenda
– It’s a pre-cursor to mandatory digital IDs for everyone, which is, again, about control and the marxist agenda
This shows that technology rules alone aren’t enough. Open conversations, digital literacy, and guidance from parents and schools are just as important in helping teens stay safe online. visit us at Telkom University Jakarta for the latest news